Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
46. It does look like that, doesn't it? I agree.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 03:56 AM
Mar 2016

But hard to fathom Obama. Not sure what he's up to with Clinton. I just feel he's got some reasons to loathe her --rather like most Americans do, in so many polls, but with more at stake for him personally.

If she's indicted and his administration ends in scandal, not good for him.

If the FBI wants to indict, and he interferes--and it becomes known (which it probably would)--not good for him. ("Saturday Night Massacre," etc.) (He himself could be impeached in that case, late in his term.)

If he's arranged for a whitewash of Clinton by the FBI (if it's a protective rather than a real investigation) and the Pukes find out, not good for him. (He'll be out of it, but his legacy would be tainted. His legacy is in peril almost no matter what he does.)

In the unlikely event that the FBI, doing a real investigation, finds the pay-to-play okay, and finds the insecure server okay, and finds whatever else they're looking into okay, he can relax and look forward to a very nice retirement with the occasional lucrative speech. He'll be known as a peacemaker, but no one will ever know why he did the things he did--for instance, the visit to Cuba. (So unusual, so dramatic, so offensive to the Miami mafia.) Or won't ever know the real reason: Honduras.

Oh, wanted to ask you: Do you mean, by "messing with one President by another is a Big No No," Bill Clinton messing with Obama via the Clinton Foundation? I'm not sure what you meant.

Chicago politics. Hm-m-m. Maybe we'll end up thinking of Obama as our savior. It is VERY weird having a candidate for president, in the middle of an election, being investigated by the FBI. It is as unprecedented as having a candidate running a quite successful presidential campaign on small money. I don't think that's happened before either. (And presidential candidates comparing their dicks--that's new, too.)

Still, the FBI investigation--even with 150 agents getting cataracts studying all those emails--could be just a ploy to outwit the morons in Congress.

Stay tuned.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Love Charlie....nt grasswire Mar 2016 #1
Canova probably prompted Obama to endorse DWS when he accused geek tragedy Mar 2016 #2
Because that's the only thing that matters? daleanime Mar 2016 #13
It's disqualifying in a Democratic primary nt geek tragedy Mar 2016 #16
I agree Jack Rabbit Mar 2016 #21
Good thing neither Clinton nor Sanders stole votes. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #23
Yes, I'm glad we can Jack Rabbit Mar 2016 #27
Is it sane to pretend you support someone and then chastise the real supporters cui bono Mar 2016 #42
It's one of the tactics that gets dreamed up at the Cave Think Tank. Trying to get the first rhett o rick Mar 2016 #55
...and then tag teaming with mutual masterbation for a number of posts... bvar22 Mar 2016 #60
A lot of it is just plain bullying. They justify it because they bully for goodness, or a perceived rhett o rick Mar 2016 #62
Our entire Old Codger Mar 2016 #3
I blame the enablers much more than I blame the "opposition" FlatBaroque Mar 2016 #4
Zactly! nt Duppers Mar 2016 #11
+1 whereisjustice Mar 2016 #22
Americans in general have bought in to the propaganda just like little kids think the Harlem Dustlawyer Mar 2016 #40
Been that way for decades, you think we will ever transform away from a militant plutocracy? Rex Mar 2016 #5
We'll "transform" in one way or another Hydra Mar 2016 #7
Seems that way. abelenkpe Mar 2016 #8
Yes it is. 840high Mar 2016 #9
Thank you Esquire Gregorian Mar 2016 #6
What's NSA Got On You, Obama? billhicks76 Mar 2016 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Mar 2016 #29
I vote he was not that liberal to begin with and he just said SammyWinstonJack Mar 2016 #30
i remember when he flipped..one night he was going to filibuster it questionseverything Mar 2016 #54
Yes Before The 2008 Election billhicks76 Mar 2016 #65
a lot, probably Fast Walker 52 Mar 2016 #34
I don't necessarily think they have anything on him, I think they've made it clear that they run rhett o rick Mar 2016 #64
The term "progressive" isn't just a buzz word. Neoliberals don't get to be progressives, also. nt w4rma Mar 2016 #12
+5 appalachiablue Mar 2016 #17
+1000 GoneFishin Mar 2016 #24
Seriously, first the right wing makes liberal a bad word, then the centrists water down progressive. cui bono Mar 2016 #43
Thanks, Charles and phantom power... Thespian2 Mar 2016 #14
Her supporters must be factually challenged SHRED Mar 2016 #15
Obama is real funny - he spent a lot more time and energy fighting for the TPP than he did ish of the hammer Mar 2016 #18
Isn't that the truth. SammyWinstonJack Mar 2016 #33
Righteous Rant passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #19
K&R! TeamPooka Mar 2016 #20
She is a frickin' disgrace. GoneFishin Mar 2016 #25
Time to dump DWS. GoneOffShore Mar 2016 #26
Preach it Charles! zentrum Mar 2016 #28
What a disappointment florida08 Mar 2016 #31
K&R emsimon33 Mar 2016 #32
That's the kind of joke that's not funny. Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #35
Do Clinton Supporters Actually Like DWS thebeautifulstruggle Mar 2016 #36
Obama's endorsement of DWS makes me think he WON'T protect Hillary Clinton from... Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #37
I think he is playing Chicago politics with her. IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #38
It does look like that, doesn't it? I agree. Peace Patriot Mar 2016 #46
Hmmm. A legacy that you supported corruption vs. a legacy that you didn't. Skwmom Mar 2016 #57
so it's two rival personalist, neolib power blocs MisterP Mar 2016 #39
Could All This lead to Clinton being Elected and then Impeached? n/t LarryNM Mar 2016 #45
I thought he was pretty clear in the interview with Goldberg. bemildred Mar 2016 #49
I think you are right about that. phantom power Mar 2016 #52
I think you're right. bemildred Mar 2016 #53
I think I'm falling in love with Charlie Pierce. Zen Democrat Mar 2016 #41
K&R avaistheone1 Mar 2016 #44
"cracked" what? Jeffersons Ghost Mar 2016 #47
K&R! myrna minx Mar 2016 #48
Tim Canova has my support! countryken Mar 2016 #50
Likewise! jomin41 Mar 2016 #51
Tim Canova all the way! lark Mar 2016 #56
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz IS a joke, so it must have been easy. So Far From Heaven Mar 2016 #58
Oh gawd. Now when someone calls "payday loan Debbie" a dino, all of the rest of the Doctor_J Mar 2016 #59
This is not the first time Obama has gone to bat for Wasserman-Schultz: bvar22 Mar 2016 #61
Soon Pres Obama will be deciding to pardon some people. Will he show Gov Siegelman a loyal rhett o rick Mar 2016 #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Charles Pierce: President...»Reply #46