Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Pact Between Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich to Privatize Social Security [View all]whathehell
(30,457 posts)93. Lol..you're funny.
Um, yes, I know what quote marks indicate. The problem is you put them around the word "influence" itself, rather than on a word which would indicate this "paramount" quality you incorrectly claimed I attributed to that influence - Check a dictionary, genius, because
Paramount doesn't mean "a lot", which is what I DID claim, it means "the most" and I never used that word...Get it?
"You still haven't credibly answered my question about why Bernie can't do it and Obama did it"
LOL. I never answered that question, credibly or incredibly, because you you never ASKED it
For real, bro.....check all your posts to.me...You never asked any question at all.
See what I mean about being funny?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Pact Between Bill Clinton and Newt Gingrich to Privatize Social Security [View all]
eridani
Mar 2016
OP
Don't worry, Hillary won't listen to Newt. She will, however, listen to Pete Peterson.
Scuba
Mar 2016
#1
Handing SS to Wall Street would be the ultimate return on their investment in Hillary.
A Simple Game
Mar 2016
#4
There won't be much harm left to do, at that point, is the problem. Mission accomplished.
djean111
Apr 2016
#101
Geez, a 15 year old article from a RW publications (cato) and a 18 year old article.
Fla Dem
Apr 2016
#105
These books tell who was there, and what they did, saw, said and wrote, which has nothing to do
DhhD
Mar 2016
#39
As they should be...Every study on voters in both parties shows overwhelming support
whathehell
Mar 2016
#15
Do they know that "Democrats" like Bill and Hillary Clinton contemplate it right now?
highprincipleswork
Mar 2016
#54
waiting for post about how clinton plays 40 dimensional chess like they say about obama
dembotoz
Mar 2016
#16
Hillary Clinton has jumped from an insurance trust fund montly benefit to charity for the poor along
DhhD
Mar 2016
#43
Yes they should, and therefore be taxed appropriately on their incomes; all of it, on and off shore.
DhhD
Mar 2016
#47
I do not trust Hillary with my Social Security either. Nor Medicare. Nor any social programs, if she
highprincipleswork
Mar 2016
#86