Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Uber, Lyft owe Chicago $15 million, other Chicagoland entities millions more [View all]bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)26. yeah, of all people Tom should be more open to these critiques. I find that
all his research and knowledge is a bit tainted by his refusal to consider this and be so willing to tout something like Uber on his show. sad.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Uber, Lyft owe Chicago $15 million, other Chicagoland entities millions more [View all]
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2016
OP
The entrenched players and the taxi industry are not Angels, and Uber/Lyft,are not cartoon villains.
tritsofme
Mar 2016
#1
No Progressive would defend Uber. The rest of you will find ways to rationalize their business model
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2016
#3
Virtually any criticism you levy at Uber can be levied at regular yellow cabs.
stevenleser
Apr 2016
#30
Every city seeks finger printing and criminal background checks. Most of these "regulations" are
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#33
And with all that, most taxi drivers are nastier than Uber drivers. Where are your regulations for
stevenleser
Apr 2016
#34
Take Uber. Customer service is beside the point. Level the playing field and compete! Read, Steve.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#36
Nope, you arent addressing anything. You have an odd vendetta against Uber. nt
stevenleser
Apr 2016
#39
Democrats, Progressives should have a vendetta against the sharing economy. Both Hillary and Bernie
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#41
Steve! I have a vendetta against Wal-Mart and Amazon, too. Did you read about it. Yeah, pretty much
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#42
Steve! Wake up, we're losing you, maybe we lost you. Steve! Do you see the big picture I'm painting?
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#43
Steve! How often do you feel unsafe? I'm a big guy, too. Based on my experience, safety never
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#44
Steve! Do you have blind and handicapped people, too, or are they unique to Chicago?
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#45
Steve, remember when the Democratic Party stood for "fair competition" not you libertarian "free
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#37
Thanks. Jeff Bezos, Microsoft, their billionaire class investors are impressive
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2016
#4
You know you are shitty of you make taxi companies, of all things, look like the good guys.
Odin2005
Mar 2016
#5
Whatever that means, I'll reply to it anyway. First, Uber isn't going away, so stop with your
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2016
#6
There's room for both. People who prefer cabs tell cabbies they'd never use Uber because it's like
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2016
#8
Don't be fooled by their slick marketing campaign. Make no mistake, Uber
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2016
#9
CEO Travis Kalanick is said to be a big fan of libertarianism's favorite author, Ayn Rand
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2016
#10
I'm not sure where people get their information from. Most likely Uber. They have the PR machine
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2016
#12
Every city has its problems and not every city is a "cab city" like Chicago. But people have
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2016
#14
That's not so. True, it's based on the Walmart and Amazon model, but cities and drivers are
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#52
I know David Plouffe's tactic is to freak Uber customers out by promulgating propaganda that
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#56
Who do you think opened cities up to Uber? Those days you speak of are long gone.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#58
That's exactly what cities are doing! Subsidies and no regulations = picking winners and losers
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#60
You Libertarian know nothings are reading straight from Atlas Shrugged. I see you're from Florida
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#62
I already outed myself. I'm a member of AFSCME Council 31. AFSCME's the largest trade union of
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#64
Hahahaha! Do you want to pick winners and losers or not? Do you want to make up shit or not?
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#67
And to put the cherry on top, Uber drivers, tired of being treated like shit by Uber, have teamed up
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#65
Hillary accused Uber of "wage theft," leaves herself no wiggle room
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2016
#17
Americans will sacrifice a lot in the future to save very little, now
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Mar 2016
#20
Entitled, greedy, and behaving like the world is an Ayn Randian Utopia: Kalanick to face
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#23
Boston: Court rules Uber is a taxi service, will regulate accordingly
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#24
Hi Prism. The driver is responsible for tickets. I'll give an example of what the article
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#35
By the way, Prism, you're probably aware that all eyes are on California this June. Court will here
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#40
Court tacks on additional $10 million to February's $28 million fine for lying to customers about
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#48
City of SF: If Uber refuses to recognize drivers as employees, they need business permits
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#73
Mayor James' Floor Speech Regarding KCMO Vehicle for Hire Ordinance
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#74
They will likely never get it. This would be a good business for Mittens to get into. nt
silvershadow
Apr 2016
#76