Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Massive leak exposes how the wealthy and powerful hide their money [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)125. TIME: Panama Papers Could Lead to Capitalism’s Great Crisis
Leak shows what much of the world's 99% believes
by Rana Foroohar, TIME, April 4, 2016
Its hard to know where to start in tallying up the explosive revelations in the Panama Papers, an analysis of leaked documents from global law firm Mossack Fonseca revealed by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). Yes, weve known for a while now that the shadow financial system was growing. But its another thing to take in 11.5 million documents showing the way in which Mossack Fonseca was working with big name financial groups like UBS, HSBC, Société Générale, and many others to help elites from the Communist Party leadership of China, to soccer star Lionel Messi, to global financiers hide cash in offshore havens around the world.
Its just the tip of a much bigger iceberg. The size of the leak is unprecedented, but the tricks Mossack Fonseca has allegedly used for its clients are neither new nor surprising. Anonymous shell companies and the failure of governments to require lawyers, corporate service companies, or banks to collect beneficial ownership information on clients leave the door wide open for dirty money to flow around the globe virtually unhindered, says Heather Lowe, the Director of Government Affairs for Global Financial Integrity, a Washington DC-based consultancy.
To me, this is one of the key issues at work in the U.S. presidential election. Voters know at a gut level that our system of global capitalism is working mainly for the 1 %, not the 99 %. Thats a large part of why both Sanders and Trump have done well, because they tap into that truth, albeit in different ways. The Panama Papers illuminate a key aspect of why the system isnt workingbecause globalization has allowed the capital and assets of the 1 % (be they individuals or corporations) to travel freely, while those of the 99 % cannot. Globalization is supposed to be about the free movement of people, goods, and capital. But in fact, the system is set up to enable that mobility mainly for the rich (or for large corporations). The result is global tax evasion, the offshoring of labor, and an elite that flies 35,000 feet over the problems of nation states and the tax payers within them.
Where do we go from here? I think were heading towards a root to branch re-evaluation of how our market system worksand doesnt work. The debate over free trade is part of that re-evaluation. The calls for a global campaign against tax evasion are, too. I think there will also be intense scrutiny about the ease with which financial capital can move around the world weve already seen that with the hoopla over tax inversions, but well see a lot more backlash, in new areas.
I expect that the populist backlash will be intense and will impact everything from high-end real estate to PACs (effectively political shell companies), says one of my favorite sources, Peter Atwater, a behavioral economist. Voters are increasingly angry at the seeming transience of the financial/corporate/political elite. The 1% can move anywhere they wantand profit handsomely from the relocation, but the 99% cant. Worse, the 99% are left with the aftermaththe empty buildings of a deserted Detroit, the toxic waste from chemical plants in West Virginia or the unsustainable tax liabilities of Puerto Rico.
CONTINUED...
http://time.com/4280864/panama-papers-capitalism/
PS: Going by the 3072 shoes waiting to drop, it doesn't look like a "limited hang-out" will help the Bastards this time.
by Rana Foroohar, TIME, April 4, 2016
Its hard to know where to start in tallying up the explosive revelations in the Panama Papers, an analysis of leaked documents from global law firm Mossack Fonseca revealed by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). Yes, weve known for a while now that the shadow financial system was growing. But its another thing to take in 11.5 million documents showing the way in which Mossack Fonseca was working with big name financial groups like UBS, HSBC, Société Générale, and many others to help elites from the Communist Party leadership of China, to soccer star Lionel Messi, to global financiers hide cash in offshore havens around the world.
Its just the tip of a much bigger iceberg. The size of the leak is unprecedented, but the tricks Mossack Fonseca has allegedly used for its clients are neither new nor surprising. Anonymous shell companies and the failure of governments to require lawyers, corporate service companies, or banks to collect beneficial ownership information on clients leave the door wide open for dirty money to flow around the globe virtually unhindered, says Heather Lowe, the Director of Government Affairs for Global Financial Integrity, a Washington DC-based consultancy.
To me, this is one of the key issues at work in the U.S. presidential election. Voters know at a gut level that our system of global capitalism is working mainly for the 1 %, not the 99 %. Thats a large part of why both Sanders and Trump have done well, because they tap into that truth, albeit in different ways. The Panama Papers illuminate a key aspect of why the system isnt workingbecause globalization has allowed the capital and assets of the 1 % (be they individuals or corporations) to travel freely, while those of the 99 % cannot. Globalization is supposed to be about the free movement of people, goods, and capital. But in fact, the system is set up to enable that mobility mainly for the rich (or for large corporations). The result is global tax evasion, the offshoring of labor, and an elite that flies 35,000 feet over the problems of nation states and the tax payers within them.
Where do we go from here? I think were heading towards a root to branch re-evaluation of how our market system worksand doesnt work. The debate over free trade is part of that re-evaluation. The calls for a global campaign against tax evasion are, too. I think there will also be intense scrutiny about the ease with which financial capital can move around the world weve already seen that with the hoopla over tax inversions, but well see a lot more backlash, in new areas.
I expect that the populist backlash will be intense and will impact everything from high-end real estate to PACs (effectively political shell companies), says one of my favorite sources, Peter Atwater, a behavioral economist. Voters are increasingly angry at the seeming transience of the financial/corporate/political elite. The 1% can move anywhere they wantand profit handsomely from the relocation, but the 99% cant. Worse, the 99% are left with the aftermaththe empty buildings of a deserted Detroit, the toxic waste from chemical plants in West Virginia or the unsustainable tax liabilities of Puerto Rico.
CONTINUED...
http://time.com/4280864/panama-papers-capitalism/
PS: Going by the 3072 shoes waiting to drop, it doesn't look like a "limited hang-out" will help the Bastards this time.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
170 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jackson Stevens ties also to the Clintons, Alltel, Systematics, Beverly Enterprises
LiberalArkie
Apr 2016
#31
wondering how long it will be before the clintons and their foundation are implcated
Ferd Berfel
Apr 2016
#129
I don't think they will be and if they were it would not make any difference at all.
LiberalArkie
Apr 2016
#131
The way I see it is that most of the HRC supporters are for big business less regulation.
LiberalArkie
Apr 2016
#135
Of course not, it'll be all 'we had NO idea what that investment firm was up to, we're as outraged
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2016
#133
Leak from just one firm. Imagine what the rest of them have, helping offshore tax dodgers?
Octafish
Apr 2016
#16
As Ambassador DeSadesky said: ''That is an astonishingly good idea you have there, Doctor.''
Octafish
Apr 2016
#71
Bumping, in response to the DU'er who dissed Octafish some time back on one
silvershadow
Apr 2016
#5
Panama Papers: Iceland’s prime minister had offshore holdings in collapsed banks
bemildred
Apr 2016
#6
Yeah, I think our media is working overtime to cover up the Americans involved.
fasttense
Apr 2016
#117
'The story behind the #PanamaPapers?' tweets Edward Snowden. 'Courage is contagious.'
Octafish
Apr 2016
#68
Panama papers: Biggest data leak in history exposes offshore holdings of 12 current and former world
bemildred
Apr 2016
#9
Ted Cruz just named Phil Gramm his economic advisor. Here's Gramm's economic legacy:
KoKo
Apr 2016
#154
Phil Gramm toils at UBS with Bill Clinton in WEALTH MANAGEMENT (cough OFFSHORING?).
Octafish
Apr 2016
#156
More than half companies listed in #PanamaPapers are registered in British-administered tax havens
LiberalArkie
Apr 2016
#11
2.6 terabytes, 11.5 million documents, and 214,000 shell companies. Details
LiberalArkie
Apr 2016
#14
Panama Papers: Mossack Fonseca leak reveals New Zealand used to keep tax secrets
bemildred
Apr 2016
#15
This is one reason that going after "Wall Street" is like regulating buggy whips...
Sancho
Apr 2016
#19
You are right about the need for "stronger agreements and cooperation with other governments" but
pampango
Apr 2016
#82
Wouldn't be surprised CGI donors on this list awa in the Unaoil/Ahsani bribe machinery
stuffmatters
Apr 2016
#44
Wonderful Octafish! This will take a while....you bring the good stuff! Thanks! nt
haikugal
Apr 2016
#41
They're not hoarding it or stashing it on an island - they're hiding the flows
muriel_volestrangler
Apr 2016
#80
Zeitung responce to lack of U.S. individuals in the docs, saying "Just wait for what is coming next"
krawhitham
Apr 2016
#46
Certainly does. Remember how Princess Christina of Spain is under indictment for tax evasion?
Octafish
Apr 2016
#99
UBS one of the 10 Banks that Requested the Most Offshore Companies for Clients
Octafish
Apr 2016
#149
This isn't news, this is information. None of this is a shock or scandal to anyone who is
underahedgerow
Apr 2016
#70
So these are all the non-U.S. tax dodgers in just one (smallest) of the top four
valerief
Apr 2016
#93
and in 1987 reagan repealed the fairness doctrine and a CIA connected company
certainot
Apr 2016
#118
Over 200,000 shell companies are involved in the Panama Papers leak — here's why that's a big deal
bemildred
Apr 2016
#115
The Nazi, CIA And Nevada Connections... And Why It's Now Rothschild's Turn
Ichingcarpenter
Apr 2016
#120
K&R#199 Catherine Austin Fitts was revealing some of the structures from that Reagan/Bush/Clinton
bobthedrummer
Apr 2016
#126
Sirota: Hillary Pushed Panama Free Trade Agreements Amid Warnings this Would Happen
berni_mccoy
Apr 2016
#147
Foreign Policy asks: Will the ‘Panama Papers’ Bring Down Ukraine’s Chocolate King?
Octafish
Apr 2016
#155