Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
10. Not visionary. Sensible, and we've done it before.
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 09:59 AM
Apr 2016

Last edited Tue Apr 5, 2016, 01:19 PM - Edit history (1)

I remember when Bank of America was only allowed to operate in three states and was outraged that so many people sat on their fingers or voted in support of taking the leash off. Those who did deserve whatever they got as a result, but our nation needs to do better for the sake of the innocent and everyone to come.

The argument isn't that breaking up banks is undesirable, but that many more reforms must take place and that Bernie's plan should be broader than it is. Breaking up the banks is an emphatic, desirable move, but we could break up the banks all day long and the financial system's power to control and disrupt our economy would continue anyway. It's not the opening move under Hillary's plan, but it is on the table for everyone who wants financial reform.

Here's Elizabeth Warren on “the Unfinished Business of Financial Reform.”
http://billmoyers.com/2015/04/18/elizabeth-warren-speech/
She wants to break up the banks, but it's down there a ways because her list is significantly longer than just that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh, Bernie doesn't know what he's talking about! Human101948 Apr 2016 #1
Yep. Lot of bullshit being spread in that thread. /nt think Apr 2016 #2
Not visionary. Sensible, and we've done it before. Hortensis Apr 2016 #10
Your links argue that Bernie's ideas are not as radical as they may originally seem beastie boy Apr 2016 #14
History provides us with wisdom, Grasshopper! Human101948 Apr 2016 #15
Roosevelt's economic advisers were overwhelmingly hardcore Keynesians. beastie boy Apr 2016 #16
Some were Keynesians some were not... Human101948 Apr 2016 #20
Roosevelt was not a Keynesian when he ran. But most of his economic advisers were beastie boy Apr 2016 #23
Why does he keep calling it a mistake? JustAnotherGen Apr 2016 #3
I would assume if he accused the banks of direct malfeasance he wouldn't be in his current position think Apr 2016 #4
Yeah - either that or after he's done with this job JustAnotherGen Apr 2016 #7
Spot on :) The Teller Window. Now that's funny think Apr 2016 #8
Hillary is not going to like this... Herman4747 Apr 2016 #5
Hillary's refusal to support Glass Steagall speaks volumes on where she stands in regards to think Apr 2016 #6
Wonder what's so amusing between those two? SammyWinstonJack Apr 2016 #21
This is from 2013 the Dallas Fed.......................warning signs are everywhere............ turbinetree Apr 2016 #9
I've never seen this before. And this is by the president of the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank think Apr 2016 #11
The problem this article is discussing is that our 6 big banks jwirr Apr 2016 #19
Uh oh. How long before he wakes up with a horse head in his bed? marmar Apr 2016 #12
Hopefully there will be no horsing around.... think Apr 2016 #13
Kick and R BeanMusical Apr 2016 #17
Don't, says the Establishment. n/t Orsino Apr 2016 #18
The problem the bailout made worse... freebrew Apr 2016 #22
^ Wilms Apr 2016 #24
and that's Kashkari, the Republican who ran the stupidest campaign in California history MisterP Apr 2016 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Break up the banks, says ...»Reply #10