Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
40. Lots of lobbyists are lawyers. DoJ is their natural habitat.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:40 AM
Apr 2016

the DoJ is the 9th most populous agency habitat for former lobbyists.
http://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/top.php?display=G

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

there's more coming soon. wendylaroux Apr 2016 #1
Millions more pages coming. nt tblue37 Apr 2016 #2
I'm sure a lot of Republicans in Congress are Warpy Apr 2016 #3
if you think that only Republicans Angel Martin Apr 2016 #20
Oh, yeah, I've paid attention Warpy Apr 2016 #21
FWIW, there's this post: "USA in this huge leak: 3072 companies, 441 clients" pampango Apr 2016 #4
according to BBC US Justice Dept now reviewing. salin Apr 2016 #7
I don't think most folks DO realize that. closeupready Apr 2016 #8
They are major - but I believe I read that they are the fourth largest firm. salin Apr 2016 #10
No kidding Warpy Apr 2016 #22
Which explains two sudden departures from the DoJ. AtheistCrusader Apr 2016 #25
Tell me why you think they quit WhiteTara Apr 2016 #29
I think their names came up. AtheistCrusader Apr 2016 #30
So, you think that they wouldn't play ball WhiteTara Apr 2016 #32
Could have been industry insiders/lobbyists with quite a bit of money to roll around in. AtheistCrusader Apr 2016 #34
I never thought of the Justice Department as WhiteTara Apr 2016 #35
Lots of lobbyists are lawyers. DoJ is their natural habitat. AtheistCrusader Apr 2016 #40
Of course but the Western media will push malaise Apr 2016 #5
So you're saying we should ignore it? Blue_Tires Apr 2016 #9
Editor of German paper to break this said more is coming yurbud Apr 2016 #6
I have been glued to a couple of feeds about this all day. salin Apr 2016 #11
The law firm listed is only one of several firms doing this kind of work in Panama stevenleser Apr 2016 #12
Can you break down what this means? rbrnmw Apr 2016 #14
Sure, which stuff do you need broken down? I am very familiar with all of this. stevenleser Apr 2016 #15
OK but I was seeing posts trying to tie it to Hillary somehow rbrnmw Apr 2016 #16
Yeah, those are a joke. Here is the deal with that... stevenleser Apr 2016 #17
well I guess it's like the indictment fairy then no there there rbrnmw Apr 2016 #18
Dirsregard such posts for the time being Warpy Apr 2016 #23
thanks rbrnmw Apr 2016 #24
Yeah, this is unlikely to involve the Clintons or their foundation. AtheistCrusader Apr 2016 #28
Right? askarnia1 Apr 2016 #13
Inside Job by...? askarnia1 Apr 2016 #19
No. Because the data does contain americans. AtheistCrusader Apr 2016 #31
This guy writes for Drudge, I don't think WhiteTara Apr 2016 #33
thanks askarnia1 Apr 2016 #41
We all can and WhiteTara Apr 2016 #42
McClatchy has 600 American names... ViseGrip Apr 2016 #26
And they said none of them are political figures. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #37
Which reminds me, to this day there is not a single scandal Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #27
The Rethugs made up the ultimate scandal with the birther contentions. pnwmom Apr 2016 #38
The guy is squeaky clean, boring even Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #39
Don't expect any huge names from the U.S. roamer65 Apr 2016 #36
Just not yet - patience nt LiberalElite Apr 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, no US officials are i...»Reply #40