Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A 16 year old should absolutely make $31K [View all]steve2470
(37,481 posts)140. from 2013 but still very relevant
The new campaign to increase the minimum wage has drawn the familiar arguments against it out of the academic shadows and back into the public debate. They have a long history. In a fireside chat the night before he signed the bill, Franklin Roosevelt took their measure, urging his listeners to ignore the nattering of "any calamity-howling executive with an income of $1,000 a day" telling them "that a wage of $11 a week is going to have a disastrous effect on all American industry."
Who's leading the charge against a minimum wage increase today? The restaurant industry, which includes such fast-food mega-companies as McDonald's and Yum Brands (owner of KFC, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut), both of which are earning higher profits now than before the recession.
The most common objection to a higher minimum wage always has been that it leads to lower employment. This is one of those "everybody knows" talking points, and it does have a strong intuitive appeal. Stands to reason, doesn't it? Require business owners to spend more on each employee, and of course they're going to spread it among fewer people.
As it happens, the employment effect of the minimum wage is "one of the most studied topics in all of economics," observes economist John Schmitt. So it's curious that, despite decades of searching, economists have failed to document consistently any such phenomenon.
Who's leading the charge against a minimum wage increase today? The restaurant industry, which includes such fast-food mega-companies as McDonald's and Yum Brands (owner of KFC, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut), both of which are earning higher profits now than before the recession.
The most common objection to a higher minimum wage always has been that it leads to lower employment. This is one of those "everybody knows" talking points, and it does have a strong intuitive appeal. Stands to reason, doesn't it? Require business owners to spend more on each employee, and of course they're going to spread it among fewer people.
As it happens, the employment effect of the minimum wage is "one of the most studied topics in all of economics," observes economist John Schmitt. So it's curious that, despite decades of searching, economists have failed to document consistently any such phenomenon.
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jun/28/business/la-fi-hiltzik-20130630
Guess who's against raising the minimum wage ? The Cato Institute
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
184 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Exactly, no kid should have to work full-time instead of being in school, even at a higher minimum
brush
Apr 2016
#80
15 an hour would sure help cut down on the amount the gov't or parents pay for college huh?
hollowdweller
Apr 2016
#129
Nobody is "required" to hire anyone, but if they do, they should pay them a living wage
world wide wally
Apr 2016
#6
Nobody is required to retain somebody if they are not worth what they are paying them.
hollowdweller
Apr 2016
#122
What kind of skilled laborer does a small business deserve to employ for $15 / hour?
Orrex
Apr 2016
#20
See my post #111 to put this in the perspective of the cost of a college education at a state
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#126
So what would currently take 2 hours labor to buy, would now take 1.3 hours. It's cheaper.
Glassunion
Apr 2016
#145
Unless your business is built solely on the premise of paying people the very minimum allowed by law
Glassunion
Apr 2016
#159
I don't know your situation, but sometimes the owners need to absorb some of the increase in costs,
Hoyt
Apr 2016
#178
Thats when you hire landscapers for outside/ cleaning service for inside and you pay a set rate.
Sunlei
Apr 2016
#67
I know we are supposed to celebrate small business people and farmers in the U.S.A....
hunter
Apr 2016
#28
unskilled? the post mentioned sweeping floor and taking out trash and clean toilets -- what kind
saturnsring
Apr 2016
#23
Don't argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with their experience.
Vincardog
Apr 2016
#86
Not even to China. The factories on Mexico's border pay $7 a day to make our washers/dryers &
Sunlei
Apr 2016
#97
See my post 111 in which I compare $31,000 to the cost of a year of UC at Berkeley.
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#120
I don't think it's legal for children to work those hours, not sure though if state/federal child..
Sunlei
Apr 2016
#13
If you pay some people by the hour they tend to drag out the work to get more hours.
saturnsring
Apr 2016
#24
Some do, probably best to pay kids * by the job rather then the hour.Like sweep floors for $30.
Sunlei
Apr 2016
#34
I think the Federal minimum should be about $20 an hour.Including farm workers & prisoners get 100%
Sunlei
Apr 2016
#43
All legal and fair on visa paperwork. I think foreign visa required fed minimum wage is why Congress
Sunlei
Apr 2016
#62
a cite for what? visa people who are hired to work are required to be paid our federal minimum wage.
Sunlei
Apr 2016
#90
Individuals not so much but America brings in 'crews' of foreign workers to do forestry work, resort
Sunlei
Apr 2016
#108
That's true, but I think it's better to supervise & make them resweep the missed corners :P
Sunlei
Apr 2016
#88
So all the companies who current require that work done will just choose to close instead?
Kentonio
Apr 2016
#32
if the law becomes mandatory, all affected businesses will raise prices a bit to accomodate
steve2470
Apr 2016
#44
Not really. Companies like Amazon that use massive amounts of automation will be less affected,
Nye Bevan
Apr 2016
#54
Business owners are constantly weighing the benefits versus the costs of automation.
Nye Bevan
Apr 2016
#81
Indeed, if you are going to enact policies that preclude large numbers of low-skilled people
Nye Bevan
Apr 2016
#93
I think a $15 an hour law is justified for teens but should be phased in slowly
steve2470
Apr 2016
#42
very good points. I wonder if thats where Obama got the $10.10 minimum wage he pushed for years.
Sunlei
Apr 2016
#64
Information about current national minimum wage (no copyrights, all govt. material)
steve2470
Apr 2016
#48
States also have minimum wage laws. California's minimum wage will be moving up to $15 per hour
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#115
It depends. Is your degree in Performance Bassoon from The University of Arizona?
Glassunion
Apr 2016
#162
Because there is always truth in humor. I was going to school for a degree in music myself...
Glassunion
Apr 2016
#167
I started working very young -- carrying ads from door to door when I was younger than I care
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#117
The good old days. One of my daughters started a business at 12, but she did not make a lot
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#138
You post does not fit the myopic view some have in regards to living wages.
Glassunion
Apr 2016
#149