Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eniwetok

(1,629 posts)
12. Read it back in 04
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 08:41 AM
Apr 2016

I used to post in the Rockridge forum... here's an old post from 05

Reframing: Income Tax = Opportunity Tax

Sorry for the repost. Perhaps this is the more appropriate forum.

Maybe someone's already suggested this.

Reading the section here about reframing the tax issue I was reminded of how a few years ago in debates with people on the Right I began replace the term income tax with opportunity tax. It better frames the moral basis for progressive taxation. It calls into question the myth promulgated by the Right that every individual earns their wealth completely by their own initiative. The truth is no one's good idea or skills alone will make them wealthy in the American sense of the word in an impoverished third world nation. They need a nation with an extensively developed infrastructure... from an educated workforce to highways to public health.... and such things are largely the result of PUBLIC investments.

No one discounts the value of creativity and hard work to society but by taxing "opportunity" the wealthy help repay the public for use of that infrastructure in proportion to how much they take advantage of it... as reflected in income, or course!


Oh hell... here's another


Reframing Is NOT Enough if Core Values Have Been Compromised

While I certainly agree with Lakoff that reframing what Progressives stand for is crucial to advancing a Progressive agenda... we have to ask just what is being reframed? Does it represent a Progressive vision of where we want to take America? Or does it represent what's left of a Progressive vision after it's been compromised by the dysfunctional dynamics of our two party system? This has reached such absurdity that most who consider themselves in favor of democracy live an Orwellian contradiction unaware that what they support is actually a system that's both undemocratic and often anti-democratic.

We see those thick ideological blinders even here where Lakoff's taxonomy of Progressive cognitive modes seems to be describing the left-wing of the Democratic Party... not the full spectrum of Progressive thought. More on that here: http://forum.rockridgeinstitute.org/?q=node/595

I believe Progressives occasionally need to revisit and rethink our core values. What's needed is a form of political psychoanalysis.... a values clarification process upon which we can then reconstruct a logically coherent paradigm upon which to base that vision.

Here's a possible web model for such a project: http://forum.rockridgeinstitute.org/?q=node/577


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And, of course, if doing so helps delay addressing the problems..... daleanime Apr 2016 #1
you think Christmas moonbabygo Apr 2016 #2
don't want to get sidetracked... but since you asked eniwetok Apr 2016 #4
Me too. I LOVE that moment when I hear the first Christmas song of the year on the radio, Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #13
"Prosecute the bankers," "Christian values," "Boots on the ground" Oneironaut Apr 2016 #3
Christian Values? eniwetok Apr 2016 #5
This is what, the fifth thread you've started attacking democrats in one form or fashion? X_Digger Apr 2016 #6
pray tell... WHERE'S THIS ATTACK? eniwetok Apr 2016 #14
Framing the Debate OhioBlue Apr 2016 #7
Read it back in 04 eniwetok Apr 2016 #12
I think you mean "pro-LIFE" in your first sentence. nt tblue37 Apr 2016 #8
So we're criticizing Dem positions instead of advocating again? tkmorris Apr 2016 #9
heaven forbid eniwetok Apr 2016 #11
Yep, words are tricky, all right. nt bemildred Apr 2016 #10
They really are, aren't they? nt Zorra Apr 2016 #16
Branding is an efficient and effective method of advertising a message. LanternWaste Apr 2016 #15
sure branding is important eniwetok Apr 2016 #19
It's a wonder you can even think at all. Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #17
PKB? eniwetok Apr 2016 #18
I leave the substance-free narrative to you. Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #20
I can see where the ignore feature can be useful eniwetok Apr 2016 #21
Lol...Your oblivious to the amount of irony you deliver. Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #22
not going to get in the gutter... eniwetok Apr 2016 #23
The irony is steep with this one. Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #24
Republicans say pro-LIFE. They would never say CHOICE WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #25
I can remember to the days when the so called pro life movement made the change. PatrickforO Apr 2016 #26
... handmade34 Apr 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Political Catch Phrases C...»Reply #12