Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eniwetok

(1,629 posts)
3. 50% at $100k????
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 10:20 AM
Apr 2016

I think that's WAY too extreme. The big problem the US has is excessive inequality at the top... and how the ultra rich have benefited by the irresponsible tax cuts over the past 35 years which is a big cause of the debt. So perhaps 50% starting at $10 million and I'd like to end the capital gains tax break except in cases where risky investments can benefit us all... such as medical and energy research... and if someone sells their home. And why should capital gains be exempt from FICA? There should be no tax breaks for speculation on Wall St or commodities...

CBO estimates that more than 90 percent of the benefits of reduced tax rates on capital gains and dividends will accrue to
households in the highest income quintile in 2013, with almost 70 percent going to households in the top percentile.

http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/43768_DistributionTaxExpenditures.pdf

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Exactly Abouttime Apr 2016 #1
50% at $100k???? eniwetok Apr 2016 #3
Defining "fair share" as an allocation of the costs of government 1939 Apr 2016 #4
OP wasn't about corporate taxation eniwetok Apr 2016 #6
Good thought, but rogerashton Apr 2016 #2
missing the point eniwetok Apr 2016 #5
But I didn't miss your fallacy. rogerashton Apr 2016 #7
sorry... no fallacy eniwetok Apr 2016 #8
I have no problems with some inequality eniwetok Apr 2016 #9
Well, it already IS pretty well "fleshed out" whatthehey Apr 2016 #10
missing the point... eniwetok Apr 2016 #12
I suspect he, and I know I, assume it is axiomatic whatthehey Apr 2016 #13
We can't have a bumper sticker debate eniwetok Apr 2016 #14
Sadly, we can have nothing but whatthehey Apr 2016 #15
I was responding to eniwetok Apr 2016 #16
It's gotta be the shoes. Fla_Democrat Apr 2016 #11
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's The Moral Basis Fo...»Reply #3