Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rogerashton

(3,960 posts)
7. But I didn't miss your fallacy.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 11:46 AM
Apr 2016

Yes, you made the case that the rich are not self-made. So far as I know, nobody except a few rich thugs think they are.

But that does not justify progressive taxes. Your argument is something like this:

Major Premise: "If fortunes were self-made, then progressive taxation would be wrong."

Minor Premise: "Fortunes are not self-made"

Conclusion: "Progressive taxation is right."

But there is a double fallacy here. If the conclusion was "Progressive taxation is not wrong." then it would be a fallacy of denying the antecedent. (Perhaps that is what you meant, not quite clear.)

In addition, of course, going from "Progressive taxation is not wrong" to "Progressive taxation is right" is a further fallacy, affirming a disjunct.

Like you, I used cellphones only as an example. Chill out, dude.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Exactly Abouttime Apr 2016 #1
50% at $100k???? eniwetok Apr 2016 #3
Defining "fair share" as an allocation of the costs of government 1939 Apr 2016 #4
OP wasn't about corporate taxation eniwetok Apr 2016 #6
Good thought, but rogerashton Apr 2016 #2
missing the point eniwetok Apr 2016 #5
But I didn't miss your fallacy. rogerashton Apr 2016 #7
sorry... no fallacy eniwetok Apr 2016 #8
I have no problems with some inequality eniwetok Apr 2016 #9
Well, it already IS pretty well "fleshed out" whatthehey Apr 2016 #10
missing the point... eniwetok Apr 2016 #12
I suspect he, and I know I, assume it is axiomatic whatthehey Apr 2016 #13
We can't have a bumper sticker debate eniwetok Apr 2016 #14
Sadly, we can have nothing but whatthehey Apr 2016 #15
I was responding to eniwetok Apr 2016 #16
It's gotta be the shoes. Fla_Democrat Apr 2016 #11
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's The Moral Basis Fo...»Reply #7