Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

handmade34

(24,040 posts)
27. ...
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 12:25 PM
Apr 2016
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/01/the-agony-of-frank-luntz/282766/

Luntz's work has always been predicated on a sort of populism—the idea that politicians must figure out what voters want to hear, and speak to them in language that comports with it. He proudly claims that his famous catchphrases, like branding healthcare reform a "government takeover" in 2010, are not his coinages but the organic product of his focus groups. The disheveled appearance, the sardonic wit, all add up to a sort of tilting against the establishment, an insistence that it listen to the Real People.

But what if the Real People are wrong? That is the possibility Luntz now grapples with. What if the things people want to hear from their leaders are ideas that would lead the country down a dangerous road?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And, of course, if doing so helps delay addressing the problems..... daleanime Apr 2016 #1
you think Christmas moonbabygo Apr 2016 #2
don't want to get sidetracked... but since you asked eniwetok Apr 2016 #4
Me too. I LOVE that moment when I hear the first Christmas song of the year on the radio, Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #13
"Prosecute the bankers," "Christian values," "Boots on the ground" Oneironaut Apr 2016 #3
Christian Values? eniwetok Apr 2016 #5
This is what, the fifth thread you've started attacking democrats in one form or fashion? X_Digger Apr 2016 #6
pray tell... WHERE'S THIS ATTACK? eniwetok Apr 2016 #14
Framing the Debate OhioBlue Apr 2016 #7
Read it back in 04 eniwetok Apr 2016 #12
I think you mean "pro-LIFE" in your first sentence. nt tblue37 Apr 2016 #8
So we're criticizing Dem positions instead of advocating again? tkmorris Apr 2016 #9
heaven forbid eniwetok Apr 2016 #11
Yep, words are tricky, all right. nt bemildred Apr 2016 #10
They really are, aren't they? nt Zorra Apr 2016 #16
Branding is an efficient and effective method of advertising a message. LanternWaste Apr 2016 #15
sure branding is important eniwetok Apr 2016 #19
It's a wonder you can even think at all. Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #17
PKB? eniwetok Apr 2016 #18
I leave the substance-free narrative to you. Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #20
I can see where the ignore feature can be useful eniwetok Apr 2016 #21
Lol...Your oblivious to the amount of irony you deliver. Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #22
not going to get in the gutter... eniwetok Apr 2016 #23
The irony is steep with this one. Katashi_itto Apr 2016 #24
Republicans say pro-LIFE. They would never say CHOICE WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2016 #25
I can remember to the days when the so called pro life movement made the change. PatrickforO Apr 2016 #26
... handmade34 Apr 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Political Catch Phrases C...»Reply #27