Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
14. This was so they could sell their global services liberalisation and the WTO
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 05:31 PM
Apr 2016

making the US model look more economically viable at a critical time - while we were and still are pushing a pie in the sky, a fake "el Dorado" of "progressive liberalisation" which means one way, irreversible global privatization of public services, education, and health care- a profoundly unwise and unworkable corporate first takeover of the future world-

We need to understand that is what they were pushing and its likely to bite us the worst if we allow that back room hijacking of the world's future to continue..

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

they basically ended cash assistance, the little bit of safety net unwed moms had in place questionseverything Apr 2016 #1
This was so they could sell their global services liberalisation and the WTO Baobab Apr 2016 #14
This will be ignored EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #2
that's exactly right stupidicus Apr 2016 #8
Required reading? SCantiGOP Apr 2016 #18
Bookmarking, thanks! nt phazed0 Apr 2016 #3
What? A Clinton lied? Knock me over with a feather. nt nichomachus Apr 2016 #4
As I understand it…. zentrum Apr 2016 #5
This is difficult to say since this is really an election issue. Jim Beard Apr 2016 #6
Bill knew damn well what he was doing? And he made his bones supporting a right wing agenda. Bill PatV Apr 2016 #7
K & R AzDar Apr 2016 #9
He didn't say welfare reform decreased poverty creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #10
color me shocked stupidicus Apr 2016 #11
did not like him then and i still don't dembotoz Apr 2016 #12
His folksiness Iwillnevergiveup Apr 2016 #13
The trouble with sticking around after the long con Fairgo Apr 2016 #15
Bill, Bill, Bill.... smh! nt Stellar Apr 2016 #16
This is why I voted Nader central scrutinizer Apr 2016 #17
Bill Clinton hasn't held public office in 15 years. Why is he still a topic? Is he running underahedgerow Apr 2016 #19
And you think his policies don't still have an impact? marmar Apr 2016 #20
I supported that particular effort in fact. It had many good merits, and got a lot of underahedgerow Apr 2016 #21
Locking tammywammy Apr 2016 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nothing Bill Clinton said...»Reply #14