General Discussion

Lurker Deluxe

(1,085 posts)

47. I would tend to agree

Sun Apr 10, 2016, 01:21 PM

Apr 2016

That most likely the man will avoid this situation simply to lessen the possibility of conflict. And to follow that train of thought it could seem reasonable that some of the opposition to transgender usage of facilities could be to avoid this very situation.

A one room locked door restroom has no need to be gender specific, and any objection to that is just childish; however large restrooms with multiple stalls/sinks/urinals could very well lead to the uncomfortable situation described. Certainly adding alcohol to this mix as in a large sports bar/stadium would not make one more comfortable with this.

I think a lot of the opposition to the laws being proposed are from opposition being drummed up by some who are not sincere in their objection and just want to stir conflict. But it is not unreasonable to assume that some of the objection is to avoid the very situation described.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

these new bathroom laws are shit. Sometimes people just can't help it [View all] demtenjeep Apr 2016 OP

Uhh. Socal31 Apr 2016 #1

too late...already had two movements since I posted demtenjeep Apr 2016 #3

lol SlayerRulz Apr 2016 #32

Restroom Revolutionaries UNITE!!! Kalidurga Apr 2016 #2

why? Lurker Deluxe Apr 2016 #5

Yep Kalidurga Apr 2016 #6

So you support restroom "guards" to ensure that only folks with certain genitalia can use them? (nt) Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #10

I didn't say or imply that. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #13

Did you not use the phrase "guarding the bathroom"? Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #14

It was the men's room we were keeping the men out Kalidurga Apr 2016 #15

Why couldn't they use it as well? oberliner Apr 2016 #16

The stalls were full of women. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #17

But if people were taking turns, couldn't men be in that line as well? oberliner Apr 2016 #18

I have no idea what happened after I left Kalidurga Apr 2016 #19

So transgender men who identify as women should not be allowed in women's locker rooms, Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #20

Bye Kalidurga Apr 2016 #21

"when I go into a bathroom I don't want to see men's junk" Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #22

In the context of this discussion FrodosPet Apr 2016 #24

This isn't about how restrooms are assigned by gender exactly Kalidurga Apr 2016 #26

And stationing genitalia guards wasn't just a little over the top? (nt) Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #28

I don't think you can read. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #29

Seriously? You have never uttered the phrase "guard the door"? nadine_mn Apr 2016 #35

And how would the "guards" have dealt with a transgender person? (nt) Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #36

The same way they dealt with any other person nadine_mn Apr 2016 #37

to clarify demtenjeep Apr 2016 #4

When ya gotta go, ya gotta go meow2u3 Apr 2016 #7

and you don't care if it is mans or womans or clean or dirty demtenjeep Apr 2016 #8

How do Americans survive mentally when they go to other countries? Rex Apr 2016 #9

if I needed to , I would demtenjeep Apr 2016 #11

I hear that, when I have to "go" it is a 10 alarm fire and everyone should clear the lane. Rex Apr 2016 #12

Right? Texasgal Apr 2016 #34

It is juvenile drivel! Where is the leadership in these states! Where are the laws to help Rex Apr 2016 #40

Or a bush by the right or left side of the road. tblue37 Jun 2016 #48

Many of us women have taken over the men's room at sporting events mnhtnbb Apr 2016 #23

I agree demtenjeep Apr 2016 #25

I'm seeing more places with a row of 3 to 5 individual bathrooms and one giant sink/mirror room arcane1 Apr 2016 #27

Why do they turn around and walk out? Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #30

It would seem a reasonable courtesy. Orrex Apr 2016 #38

When there's a line for stalls at the bathroom, why not just wait in the line? Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #39

It would seem a reasonable courtesy Orrex Apr 2016 #41

I really don't care if women decide to enter the men's room and join the line for the stalls. Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #42

It would seem a reasonable courtesy Orrex Apr 2016 #44

If "aesthetic priorities" is a fancy way of saying "needs to use the bathroom", Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #45

It would seem a reasonable courtesy Orrex Apr 2016 #46

I would tend to agree Lurker Deluxe Apr 2016 #47

What is the big deal about hubby standing at the door. dem in texas Apr 2016 #31

As a fellow sufferer I understand perfectly. nruthie Apr 2016 #33

I would like to see it illegal to prevent people from using the bathroom bhikkhu Apr 2016 #43