Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Being a woman will cost you almost half a million over your lifetime - just for being female. [View all]Triana
(22,666 posts)13. Hell yes.
Damned pink disposable razors cost 2 x what the SAME blue or black ones do. It's horse shit. I buy the BLUE ones.
Tampons are taxed as "luxury" items. There is a movement afoot to make them tax free or better yet, TOTALLY free (as we know damn well they would be if men had to use them):
This year, for the first time, the leader of the free world blasted the cost of America's tampons.
"I have no idea why states would tax these as luxury items," President Barack Obama told lifestyle video blogger Ingrid Nilsen in a YouTube interview. "I suspect it's because men were making the laws when those taxes were passed."
Nilsen responded: "I don't know anyone who has a period who thinks it's a luxury,"
"Michelle would agree with you on that," Obama replied.
Tampons aren't really singled out as "luxury items" in state tax codes, but they're often taxed as non-necessities - a fact that has spurred intense debate over what some call a "womanhood penalty." The momentum of the movement is growing as lawmakers nationwide push to strip taxes from menstrual products and college students fight to make them free.
In January, California introduced a bill to slash taxes from menstrual products in the state. Similar bills have arrived in New York, Ohio, Utah and Virginia. On the city level, Chicago could also soon waive the taxes, which city leaders called "unfair" and "discriminatory."
"I have no idea why states would tax these as luxury items," President Barack Obama told lifestyle video blogger Ingrid Nilsen in a YouTube interview. "I suspect it's because men were making the laws when those taxes were passed."
Nilsen responded: "I don't know anyone who has a period who thinks it's a luxury,"
"Michelle would agree with you on that," Obama replied.
Tampons aren't really singled out as "luxury items" in state tax codes, but they're often taxed as non-necessities - a fact that has spurred intense debate over what some call a "womanhood penalty." The momentum of the movement is growing as lawmakers nationwide push to strip taxes from menstrual products and college students fight to make them free.
In January, California introduced a bill to slash taxes from menstrual products in the state. Similar bills have arrived in New York, Ohio, Utah and Virginia. On the city level, Chicago could also soon waive the taxes, which city leaders called "unfair" and "discriminatory."
THE REST:
http://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/national/article66344077.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Being a woman will cost you almost half a million over your lifetime - just for being female. [View all]
Triana
Apr 2016
OP
You of course, have objective and peer-reviewed sources to support your allegations, yes?
LanternWaste
Apr 2016
#73
Single most of my working life, no kids, working more hours than my co-workers
SharonAnn
Apr 2016
#27
It doesn't allow for patriarchal religious socialization systems either, oh my, look at Utah. nt
Umbral18
Apr 2016
#72
When tampons are taxed but Viagra, Rogaine, dandruff shampoo & adult diapers are not,
TheDormouse
Apr 2016
#66
I'm kind of amazed at the progressives here who think such a thing is not happening.
alarimer
Apr 2016
#57
I think it's lazy reporting. There was a non-scandal when it was noted that Hillary pays her female
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#58
No one is going to pay you for you to clean your own house or raise your own kids
davidn3600
Apr 2016
#91
No amount of telling them otherwise will crack that impenetrable need to be superior.
Starry Messenger
Apr 2016
#90