Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Being a woman will cost you almost half a million over your lifetime - just for being female. [View all]davidn3600
(6,342 posts)80. But you aren't including hours worked! Men are OVERWORKING!
If your male peers are putting in hours more work, it's no surprise over the course of years that they end up making more money. They get the raises and the promotions. Their bosses and companies like them more and want to reward the hard work.
Men are overworking to make more money....women are not.
Expansion in overwork net of other changes since 1979 could have affected the gender gap in two ways: Men could be overworking increasingly more often than women, or the financial payoff to overworking could have increased, or both. In their statistical analysis, Cha and Weeden identify the second factor as critical. In 1979, workers who put in long hours tended to make less per each hour than those who worked full-time; by 2009, that had reversed. Putting in the extra hours now pays off more. Or phrased another way, working only full-time now pays off relatively less.
Women remain less likely than men to put in those long hours, even though the payoff for doing so grew, which means that men disproportionately brought in the rising wages paid to overworkers. This explains part of the reason why gender equalization in pay slowed down. The authors estimate that the higher payoff for overwork was large enough to cancel out the gains in wage equality women had made from their growing edge in college graduation and the growing importance of college. The consequences of overwork now paying so well were especially strong among professional and managerial employees (Sandbergs lean in targets).
In sum, Cha and Weeden argue, the American workplace increasingly rewards and probably expects overwork; men overwork a lot more often than women; this development helped stall pay equality.
http://blogs.berkeley.edu/2014/06/10/work-hours-and-the-pay-gap/
But feminists refuse to even look at this angle of the problem. You instead would rather have men work their 50-60 hour weeks and then you get equal pay for working 35-40 hour weeks and take time off to raise your kids.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Being a woman will cost you almost half a million over your lifetime - just for being female. [View all]
Triana
Apr 2016
OP
You of course, have objective and peer-reviewed sources to support your allegations, yes?
LanternWaste
Apr 2016
#73
Single most of my working life, no kids, working more hours than my co-workers
SharonAnn
Apr 2016
#27
It doesn't allow for patriarchal religious socialization systems either, oh my, look at Utah. nt
Umbral18
Apr 2016
#72
When tampons are taxed but Viagra, Rogaine, dandruff shampoo & adult diapers are not,
TheDormouse
Apr 2016
#66
I'm kind of amazed at the progressives here who think such a thing is not happening.
alarimer
Apr 2016
#57
I think it's lazy reporting. There was a non-scandal when it was noted that Hillary pays her female
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2016
#58
No one is going to pay you for you to clean your own house or raise your own kids
davidn3600
Apr 2016
#91
No amount of telling them otherwise will crack that impenetrable need to be superior.
Starry Messenger
Apr 2016
#90