Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stellanoir

(14,881 posts)
12. Don't forget the damned EVM's
Tue Apr 12, 2016, 09:47 AM
Apr 2016

The technology hurriedly implemented after HAVA that awarded maintenance & control of the voting machines to private partisan corps has rendered every election since vulnerable to untraceable hacking. That equipment was determined to be atrociously insecure by every single security geek who examined them. It also had a 9 year shelf life for functionality. So now, not only are they insecure, they are also degraded.

Optical Scanners employ paper ballots but the vote tallying software is suspect. Ballots are never scrutinized when margins of victory are greater than 3-5%. The percentage varies state to state.

This is not an argument to not vote. We have to overwhelm the machines with maximum participation.

Obama would have won by enormous landslides had it not been for flipping, & spoilage of millions of votes.

Kerry would have won also. The problem spread far beyond Ohio to all of the swing states. * had to win by the popular vote after the travesty of '00.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I agree metroins Apr 2016 #1
Probably, but it's not even about Hillary. It's about our supposed democracy in general. However, RKP5637 Apr 2016 #2
Representative Democracy metroins Apr 2016 #3
... but the delegates do not necessarily have to follow what the people voted for. n/t RKP5637 Apr 2016 #4
Neither do our congressmen or presidents nt metroins Apr 2016 #6
Yep, is that ever true!!! n/t RKP5637 Apr 2016 #9
Too simplistic. To be heard you need to advertise. To advertise, you need money. randome Apr 2016 #5
Yes on public financing. ...but I don't think politicians should buy elections with their own money. RKP5637 Apr 2016 #10
Career politicians are bad? Dr Hobbitstein Apr 2016 #7
Far too many career politicians. I'm speaking of the future. n /t RKP5637 Apr 2016 #11
So he gets a pass... Dr Hobbitstein Apr 2016 #14
Yep, as does Hillary! n/t RKP5637 Apr 2016 #18
Get rid of caucases too Beaverhausen Apr 2016 #8
Yep! Caucuses were likely great eons ago, but IMO not in the 21st Century. n/t RKP5637 Apr 2016 #13
Don't forget the damned EVM's stellanoir Apr 2016 #12
Definitely!!! But as is often the case, it just morphs along. The entire voting system needs to be RKP5637 Apr 2016 #16
Congress could be challenged by this clause cleverly embedded in their oath of office. . . stellanoir Apr 2016 #19
So let's go back to the genteel corruption-free politics of the 1870's! whatthehey Apr 2016 #15
LOL!!! n/t RKP5637 Apr 2016 #17
You mean the Tammany Hall era? Retrograde Apr 2016 #20
Voting in general elections, sure Spider Jerusalem Apr 2016 #21
I agree Johonny Apr 2016 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»All voting should be open...»Reply #12