Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Thinking that the WI election was "rigged" sets the stage for losing. [View all]proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)43. Excellent points, all.
https://freedom-to-tinker.com/
Freedom to Tinker is hosted by Princeton's Center for Information Technology Policy, a research center that studies digital technologies in public life. Here you'll find comment and analysis from the digital frontier, written by the Center's faculty, students, and friends.
Freedom to Tinker is hosted by Princeton's Center for Information Technology Policy, a research center that studies digital technologies in public life. Here you'll find comment and analysis from the digital frontier, written by the Center's faculty, students, and friends.
https://freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/appel/broken-ballots/
Broken Ballots
April 23, 2012 By Andrew Appel
A important new book has just been published on the technology and policy of elections. Broken Ballots: Will Your Vote Count by Douglas W. Jones and Barbara Simons, covers voting systems from the 19th century to the present, with particular focus on the last two decades. The authors describe the strengths and weaknesses of the machinery itselflever machines, optical-scan vote counters, touchscreen voting computerswith technical sophistication, yet in a way that will be accessible to a wide audience. Then they describe the strengths and weaknesses of the policy processesat the level of election administration, congressional legislation, and Federal administrative-branch agencieswith particular emphasis on the last 10 years. The authors are experts in the field of voting technology and policy, and it shows. The book is well researched with extensive citations, but its also a good read (with photos and illustrations) that has an interesting story to tell.
Broken Ballots
April 23, 2012 By Andrew Appel
A important new book has just been published on the technology and policy of elections. Broken Ballots: Will Your Vote Count by Douglas W. Jones and Barbara Simons, covers voting systems from the 19th century to the present, with particular focus on the last two decades. The authors describe the strengths and weaknesses of the machinery itselflever machines, optical-scan vote counters, touchscreen voting computerswith technical sophistication, yet in a way that will be accessible to a wide audience. Then they describe the strengths and weaknesses of the policy processesat the level of election administration, congressional legislation, and Federal administrative-branch agencieswith particular emphasis on the last 10 years. The authors are experts in the field of voting technology and policy, and it shows. The book is well researched with extensive citations, but its also a good read (with photos and illustrations) that has an interesting story to tell.
http://brokenballots.com/
Americans want to believe their votes are counted reliably, fairly, and fully, yet they have a nagging suspicion that all is not well in our country's voting systems. Broken Ballots chronicles in the greatest detail how these suspicions have been examined and how improvements have been pursued, rejected, implemented, or defeated. Jones and Simons detail the intricacies involved in maintaining the integrity of voting procedures and technologies and in protecting the outcome of elections from error or manipulation.
Presenting evidence that ballot box access and security are under serious threat by the push for unauditable voting machines and untested and unsecured internet-based voting, Broken Ballots forces us to examine closely our electoral process. As a nation, we must take a serious look at the suggestions provided by Jones and Simons and enact the legislation needed to make strides toward secure, accessible, and verifiable elections. What can be more important?
Rush Holt, U.S. Representative for New Jersey's 12th congressional district.
Americans want to believe their votes are counted reliably, fairly, and fully, yet they have a nagging suspicion that all is not well in our country's voting systems. Broken Ballots chronicles in the greatest detail how these suspicions have been examined and how improvements have been pursued, rejected, implemented, or defeated. Jones and Simons detail the intricacies involved in maintaining the integrity of voting procedures and technologies and in protecting the outcome of elections from error or manipulation.
Presenting evidence that ballot box access and security are under serious threat by the push for unauditable voting machines and untested and unsecured internet-based voting, Broken Ballots forces us to examine closely our electoral process. As a nation, we must take a serious look at the suggestions provided by Jones and Simons and enact the legislation needed to make strides toward secure, accessible, and verifiable elections. What can be more important?
Rush Holt, U.S. Representative for New Jersey's 12th congressional district.
Broken Ballots provides clear and definitive answers to the questions: How did our voting systems get to be the way they are?, Are our voting systems secure? and What can be done to improve the way we vote? Using examples from the earliest mechanical voting machines to today's proposals for voting over the Internet, it provides numerous vivid illustrations of the risks of using complex technology to collect and count our votes. It covers not only technology, but also election law, government policy and regulation, accessibility of voting systems, and the history of voting machine companies in the United States.
This book is extremely well researched and exceptionally well-written. The breadth and depth of coverage bear witness to the authors' long involvement with these issues.
This wonderful book is essential reading for anyone concerned about the security of our election systems: vendors, election officials, technologists, election integrity activists, and voters.
Ronald L. Rivest, Viterbi Professor of Computer Science in MIT's EECS Department, an ACM Turing Award winner, and a co-founder of RSA Data Security and of Verisign. He has served on the Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC), advisory to the Election Assistance Commission with respect to the establishment of voting system certification guidelines, and is a member of the CalTech/MIT Voting Technology Project.
This book is extremely well researched and exceptionally well-written. The breadth and depth of coverage bear witness to the authors' long involvement with these issues.
This wonderful book is essential reading for anyone concerned about the security of our election systems: vendors, election officials, technologists, election integrity activists, and voters.
Ronald L. Rivest, Viterbi Professor of Computer Science in MIT's EECS Department, an ACM Turing Award winner, and a co-founder of RSA Data Security and of Verisign. He has served on the Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC), advisory to the Election Assistance Commission with respect to the establishment of voting system certification guidelines, and is a member of the CalTech/MIT Voting Technology Project.
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/personnel-notes/127705-princeton-prof-edward-felten-named-ftcs-first-chief-technologist
Princeton prof. Edward Felten named FTC's first chief technologist
By Gautham Nagesh - 11/04/10 12:07 PM ET
Federal Trade Commission chairman Jon Leibowitz announced Thursday that Princeton computer science professor Edward Felten will serve as the agency's first chief technologist.
A prominent researcher, Felten is founding director of Princeton's Center for Information Technology Policy and serves as a part-time consultant for the FTC. In his new role starting in January he will advise the commission on consumer-related technology policy issues such as cybersecurity, online privacy and antitrust matters. Felten will take a one-year leave of absence from Princeton to work at the FTC.
"The trade commission is heavily involved with issues that touch on technology," Felten said. "Much of my research and the work of CITP focuses on issues of consumer protection and competitiveness. This is a chance for me to apply what I've been studying and see the policymaking process from the inside."
<...>
Princeton prof. Edward Felten named FTC's first chief technologist
By Gautham Nagesh - 11/04/10 12:07 PM ET
Federal Trade Commission chairman Jon Leibowitz announced Thursday that Princeton computer science professor Edward Felten will serve as the agency's first chief technologist.
A prominent researcher, Felten is founding director of Princeton's Center for Information Technology Policy and serves as a part-time consultant for the FTC. In his new role starting in January he will advise the commission on consumer-related technology policy issues such as cybersecurity, online privacy and antitrust matters. Felten will take a one-year leave of absence from Princeton to work at the FTC.
"The trade commission is heavily involved with issues that touch on technology," Felten said. "Much of my research and the work of CITP focuses on issues of consumer protection and competitiveness. This is a chance for me to apply what I've been studying and see the policymaking process from the inside."
<...>
I found this appointment reassuring.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
126 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thinking that the WI election was "rigged" sets the stage for losing. [View all]
MineralMan
Jun 2012
OP
because a lot of DUers can't comprehend the fact that there are people who believe differently
dionysus
Jun 2012
#4
I agree with you. That was the point I tried to make that we need to continue to fight in each
truckin
Jun 2012
#39
That is true, some believe every election that doesn't go our way is rigged. However,
truckin
Jun 2012
#56
People believe it was stolen because there's no reason to trust the system.
freedom fighter jh
Jun 2012
#33
I have raised the issue generally, many times, before it pertained to any particular election.
freedom fighter jh
Jun 2012
#55
Bullcrap. We have seen mountains of evidence of Republican cheating for years and years.
rhett o rick
Jun 2012
#111
LOL. I am saying that Repukes cheat at every turn and you call me a Republican?
rhett o rick
Jun 2012
#114
I will say it again very slow. There is a ton of evidence that repukes cheat.
rhett o rick
Jun 2012
#120
So then the choice is between unreliable results and an unmanageable situation?
freedom fighter jh
Jun 2012
#76
True in this particular instance, but I was considering the larger impact
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2012
#19
You are probably right that Walker won fair and square but would you agree that
truckin
Jun 2012
#37
A much better explanation than anything else I've heard. It amazes me that there is *no* theft when
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#47
Walker got about 38% of union housholds. Add to that fact that about 60% said they
SlimJimmy
Jun 2012
#88
That makes absolutely no sense, whatsoever. It's not that difficult to understand.
shcrane71
Jun 2012
#90
In para. 3, photo ID and registering at the polls have nothing to do with election fraud
AllyCat
Jun 2012
#52
Voters were deluged by media that re-inforced the idea the recall was illegit. n/t
EFerrari
Jun 2012
#72
NBC called it while people were still voting. NYT's called it prior to polls closing.
shcrane71
Jun 2012
#78
+1. I'm disgusted to see so many people who are ok with this election & so invested in
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#104
"Fixing an election to produce the results that actually happened would be almost impossible"
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2012
#69
There seem to be an awful lot of threads encouraging us to conform and cooperate.
Prometheus Bound
Jun 2012
#123
yeah, forget about any tools citizens have outside the regular rigged elections.
HiPointDem
Jun 2012
#106
Of course you keep fighting. But you also acknowledge that there are major problems
truckin
Jun 2012
#124