Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(7,570 posts)

26. It could have been worse.

Thu Apr 14, 2016, 08:18 AM

Apr 2016

It could have been this guy.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How on Earth did Rachel M. screw THIS one up? [View all] Ken Burch Apr 2016 OP

She was much more interested in demeaning Bernie than accuracy. nt revbones Apr 2016 #1

Yep. That's how it happens. dchill Apr 2016 #2

The giggling while talking about Bernie was beyond the pale. nt revbones Apr 2016 #3

For fucks sake, she corrected it issue. Chicago1980 Apr 2016 #9

The thmartest girl in the history of tv??? Peregrine Took Apr 2016 #4

Actually, they mixed up the photos. The label was correct - it said No Vested Interest Apr 2016 #8

You're right...it was the photos, not the names. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #14

Rachel has lost all credibility MissDeeds Apr 2016 #6

Why? Because she isn't brown nosing Bernie? Chicago1980 Apr 2016 #10

No, because she's brown nosing Hillary. Gene Debs Apr 2016 #16

Exactly. SoapBox Apr 2016 #18

Then you aren't watching. Adrahil Apr 2016 #23

I noticed it immediately. moondust Apr 2016 #7

^ This ^ Myrina Apr 2016 #29

She makes $7mn/year and has a non-union production??? cui bono Apr 2016 #30

"She" didn't select the wrong picture. madamesilverspurs Apr 2016 #12

I wasn't calling it a "conspiracy". Ken Burch Apr 2016 #15

It could have been worse. Frank Cannon Apr 2016 #26

Or this guy: Ken Burch Apr 2016 #28

She also thinks Establishment = Progressive! JoeOtterbein Apr 2016 #13

RM - A New Member Of The 1% - What More Would One Expect cantbeserious Apr 2016 #17

I caught it immediately. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #19

Rachel Maddow, The DNC, and MSNBC are no longer credible. erlewyne Apr 2016 #20

Waiting for Hillary to be blamed for this. Justice Apr 2016 #21

Did you watch after the commercial break... Stellar Apr 2016 #22

I noted it in this thread that she owned the blooper. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #24

And you see how much good it did, with certain DU participants. Paladin Apr 2016 #25