Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)

27. Ah but she runs a Non Union show whose budget goes mostly to the anchor chair and that's

Reply to cui bono (Reply #11)

Thu Apr 14, 2016, 08:54 AM

Apr 2016

why you see errors that glare and also why there is so much repetition in her material, she's got fearful second rate staff and no one on it is her peer. An excellent anchor always has a counterpart producer that shapes and checks the work. Rachel has Rachel and Rachel says Rachel's writing is perfect and her staff is good enough.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How on Earth did Rachel M. screw THIS one up? [View all] Ken Burch Apr 2016 OP

She was much more interested in demeaning Bernie than accuracy. nt revbones Apr 2016 #1

Yep. That's how it happens. dchill Apr 2016 #2

The giggling while talking about Bernie was beyond the pale. nt revbones Apr 2016 #3

For fucks sake, she corrected it issue. Chicago1980 Apr 2016 #9

The thmartest girl in the history of tv??? Peregrine Took Apr 2016 #4

Well, she admitted they'd mixed up the names a few minutes later. n/t, Ken Burch Apr 2016 #5

Actually, they mixed up the photos. The label was correct - it said No Vested Interest Apr 2016 #8

You're right...it was the photos, not the names. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #14

Rachel has lost all credibility MissDeeds Apr 2016 #6

Why? Because she isn't brown nosing Bernie? Chicago1980 Apr 2016 #10

No, because she's brown nosing Hillary. Gene Debs Apr 2016 #16

Exactly. SoapBox Apr 2016 #18

Then you aren't watching. Adrahil Apr 2016 #23

I noticed it immediately. moondust Apr 2016 #7

It's not as if she herself did it. Someone who works behind the scenes screwed up. cui bono Apr 2016 #11

Ah but she runs a Non Union show whose budget goes mostly to the anchor chair and that's Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #27

^ This ^ Myrina Apr 2016 #29

She makes $7mn/year and has a non-union production??? cui bono Apr 2016 #30

"She" didn't select the wrong picture. madamesilverspurs Apr 2016 #12

I wasn't calling it a "conspiracy". Ken Burch Apr 2016 #15

It could have been worse. Frank Cannon Apr 2016 #26

Or this guy: Ken Burch Apr 2016 #28

She also thinks Establishment = Progressive! JoeOtterbein Apr 2016 #13

RM - A New Member Of The 1% - What More Would One Expect cantbeserious Apr 2016 #17

I caught it immediately. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #19

Rachel Maddow, The DNC, and MSNBC are no longer credible. erlewyne Apr 2016 #20

Waiting for Hillary to be blamed for this. Justice Apr 2016 #21

Did you watch after the commercial break... Stellar Apr 2016 #22

I noted it in this thread that she owned the blooper. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #24

And you see how much good it did, with certain DU participants. Paladin Apr 2016 #25