Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
2. they are getting 70 cents to $1.25 per day
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 06:55 PM
Apr 2016

not exactly a living wage.

I am not saying they will not appreciate having their income double, but

the argument against a minimum income is

If people can get their needs met without working, why would anybody work? And if almost nobody works, then how do you sustain this basic minimum income? In this experiment the minimum income is clearly NOT enough to give most people an incentive to stop working.

I am also always curious about prices. What can they buy with $2? In America that would only get you about two hamburgers, or a half gallon of milk or something. It would not come close to putting a roof over your head. So are they somehow living rent and tax free? And can they do things like - buy a whole chicken for 50 cents? Or would they be more like us - buy a bag of flour, get some free water from a stream, catch some rabbits and make a stew (or some such subsistence life)?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A charity's radical exper...»Reply #2