General Discussion

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)

49. The scientists can't get on tv! They simply cannot get out the word.

Fri Apr 15, 2016, 01:50 PM

Apr 2016

Oh, they're advocating for population stabilization. In one of Dr. Paul Ehrlich's international conferences, I have heard them speak out in great frustration over their ignored pleas to get on air. The media do not want this to be aired.

What we know now is that we're out of time for engineering solutions, and population stabilization. We need to work on those simultaneously, or we'll get nowhere. But the only way out of this situation now is "an immediate and deep reduction in energy demand". That's a quote by Kevin Anderson, a high level climate scientist.

Thanks for an unexpected, positive reply. It's also great to know there are others who are aware of the actual problem. It's numbers, and what those numbers of people are doing. Two factors. We only control one, while the other continues to grow.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

89 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

People Still Don't Get the Link between Meat Consumption and Climate Change [View all] Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 OP

People Still Don't Get the Link between Population and Climate Change Gregorian Apr 2016 #1

Ding, ding, ding. We have the winner! FLPanhandle Apr 2016 #24

The scientists can't get on tv! They simply cannot get out the word. Gregorian Apr 2016 #49

Well, for millennia, that meat wasn't raised as an "industrial product," nor as much of it consumed villager Apr 2016 #54

If you have a human population of less than one billion, that doesn't matter FLPanhandle Apr 2016 #60

Sure, let's ignore everything else until a 70% die-off! Steaks and SUVs all around! villager Apr 2016 #65

Strawman FLPanhandle Apr 2016 #67

Actually, the extent of yours seems to be: "What can I say to get myself off the hook?" villager Apr 2016 #75

Hrmmm anigbrowl Apr 2016 #87

How much of what they consume is irrelevant? The nature of economic exploitation RadiationTherapy Apr 2016 #57

Many here are desperate to absolve themselves of any personal responsibility. villager Apr 2016 #76

yup, this is the real problem.... mike_c Apr 2016 #58

Restaurant offerings are part of the problem considering how many people eat out in the USA Person 2713 Apr 2016 #2

People still don't get the link between chemical GMO industrial agriculture and climate change AxionExcel Apr 2016 #3

I'm not familiar with that myself Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #6

The link is at least two-fold AxionExcel Apr 2016 #11

Just a reminder yewberry Apr 2016 #16

ok, thanks-- I'll check it out Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #22

GMOs may help with climate change HassleCat Apr 2016 #53

"chemical free food" Major Nikon Apr 2016 #72

You really are a one trick pony and yor posts make no sense. N/t Humanist_Activist Apr 2016 #86

Domestic livestock agriculture is killing the biosphere. tabasco Apr 2016 #4

It doesn't wash with me TexasProgresive Apr 2016 #5

The process is natural but the extent is not Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #9

Is there more vegetation tonnage on the earth or less? TexasProgresive Apr 2016 #10

Considering how much land we've converted to fields, fueled with synthetic fertilizer NickB79 Apr 2016 #12

My premise is that it doesn't matter over the long run TexasProgresive Apr 2016 #14

the main problem is the methane produced by the massive numbers of livestock Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #21

It's those darned cow-farts...and they don't eat meat. nt clarice Apr 2016 #7

but the catch is - they're raised for people who do LiberalElite Apr 2016 #15

exactly. Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #18

Also for milk? nt clarice Apr 2016 #34

it also just takes a lot more energy to create meat than non-meat CreekDog Apr 2016 #66

People Still Don't Get the Link between Having Babies and Climate Change Major Nikon Apr 2016 #8

Nailed it. nt NickB79 Apr 2016 #13

there are lots of things that can be addressed, but eating less meat is a simple and easy way to Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #19

+1 FLPanhandle Apr 2016 #25

Yup. Agschmid Apr 2016 #33

Depressing thread. yewberry Apr 2016 #17

Most people refuse to make a personal sacrifice for the planet. milestogo Apr 2016 #20

doing smaller portions of meat is easier than giving it up completely eShirl Apr 2016 #23

The biggest thing people can do to save the planet is to not have children FLPanhandle Apr 2016 #26

This is actually what caused my stint in vegetarianism, which kicked my arse hereforthevoting Apr 2016 #27

Some information (visual) to help 2naSalit Apr 2016 #28

Here is a better visual of the real problem FLPanhandle Apr 2016 #29

Good one! 2naSalit Apr 2016 #30

Are you arguing people don't have a right to reproduce? Marengo Apr 2016 #35

They may have a right to 2naSalit Apr 2016 #36

there are also horrible religious moements who think they need to over-produce babies Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #40

And there's that too! ....nt 2naSalit Apr 2016 #41

"The right of the people to keep and bear children shall not be infringed." GliderGuider Apr 2016 #44

You regard children as weapons? Marengo Apr 2016 #74

In a sardonic sense, yes. GliderGuider Apr 2016 #80

Interesting and thought provoking response. Marengo Apr 2016 #89

Understood, and I would suggest an edit to that post... Marengo Apr 2016 #45

there are underlying 2naSalit Apr 2016 #47

People who reproduce are deliberately and consciously infringing on you rights? Marengo Apr 2016 #48

How about 2naSalit Apr 2016 #61

Careless is quite a bit different from "on purpose" Marengo Apr 2016 #73

Mix it up however you want. 2naSalit Apr 2016 #78

Ask the "quiver-full" folks... n/t fullautohotdog Apr 2016 #79

I've never heard of it being a "right" PasadenaTrudy Apr 2016 #50

I've heard it being touted 2naSalit Apr 2016 #62

Exactly PasadenaTrudy Apr 2016 #85

'Rights' are determined by our collective priorities. ronnie624 Apr 2016 #38

The post I responded to seemed to be suggesting the right didn't exist in the present... Marengo Apr 2016 #43

The legal right exists, ronnie624 Apr 2016 #64

+1 n/t PasadenaTrudy Apr 2016 #51

Most people don't want to know danimich1 Apr 2016 #31

Meat, energy, people GliderGuider Apr 2016 #32

+1 ....nt 2naSalit Apr 2016 #37

I don't know about your numbers-- it's a tricky calculation-- but I agree with your basic conclusion Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #39

My numbers are based on a series of assumptions GliderGuider Apr 2016 #42

I cut down on my meat consumption to help the planet. DookDook Apr 2016 #46

that's awesome! Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #56

Carnivores are patriotic! HassleCat Apr 2016 #52

our whole system of food production simply sucks SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #55

Not all of us can eat VTP or tofu Aerows Apr 2016 #59

People don't get the link between vegetarianism and... lame54 Apr 2016 #63

Nice attitude. yewberry Apr 2016 #68

People don't get that THEY are the reason for climate change. So Far From Heaven Apr 2016 #69

Read the article. No cause and effect explanation whatsoever bhikkhu Apr 2016 #70

they didn't explain the connection but they did link to this piece Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #81

In much of the west, pasture is fairly natural bhikkhu Apr 2016 #82

the problem is massive factory animal farming, not just some cows grazing on natural land Fast Walker 52 Apr 2016 #83

Not really... 2naSalit Apr 2016 #88

I switched to an almost-completely plant-based diet three years ago athena Apr 2016 #71

Conversely, I switched to an almost-completely meat-based diet three years ago GliderGuider Apr 2016 #84

Restaurants create their menu based on consumer demand. ohnoyoudidnt Apr 2016 #77