Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 09:50 AM Apr 2016

WaPo: These striking numbers show just how fast we’re switching off coal [View all]

Last week, even as Peabody Energy, the world’s biggest coal company, declared bankruptcy, the U.S. government issued striking figures showing how much coal production in the United States has declined in the space of just a few years.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration, in its latest Short-Term Energy Outlook, stated that the U.S. production of coal last month totaled 52 million short tons — which was a 36 percent decrease from levels seen just one year earlier, in March of 2015.

The U.S. produced 999.7 million short tons of coal in 2014, according to EIA, the large majority of which was consumed to generate electricity right here at home. However, in 2015 that dipped to 895.4 million short tons, a drop of more than 100 million tons in just one year. The drop, incidentally, was considerably more than EIA itself had forecast around this time a year ago, when the agency had expected a decline to 926 million tons.

So there was a big decline in U.S. coal production when comparing 2014 with 2015 — but looking at 2016, the drop is expected to be even bigger. “Forecast coal production is expected to decrease by 143 [million short tons] (16%) in 2016, which would be the largest annual percentage decline since 1958,” says EIA. Total production is forecast to just be 752.5 million short tons, or an over 200 million ton decline from the level just 2 years ago.

https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=&w=1484

The major contributor of lower coal production in the most recent STEO compared with a year ago is the increase in natural gas used in the electric power sector, mainly because of lower natural gas prices. ... The decline of coal burning has contributed to a reduction of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions — but there are arguments that the rise of gas has actually not been all to the good.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/04/19/these-striking-numbers-show-just-how-fast-were-switching-off-coal/

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This quote: Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #1
Burning carbon in any form creates CO2. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #2
True, but the CO2 output per kilowatt hour of coal is significantly higher than other fuels IDemo Apr 2016 #4
But fracking gas leaks methane horribly NickB79 Apr 2016 #5
If you burn twice as much methane, net gain is the same. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #6
Good news but a rational society would add job programs to WV & KY Bucky Apr 2016 #3
Wyoming. TransitJohn Apr 2016 #9
The job losses will likely go unreported / unnoticed. karadax Apr 2016 #10
Dealing with an increasingly unemployed/underemployed population..... daleanime Apr 2016 #12
Yeah, but that's not the United States gratuitous Apr 2016 #21
How much coal does America export to other countries for them to burn? wish we could help those Sunlei Apr 2016 #7
Apparently about 8% of our production in 2015. Coal exports were down 24% from 2014 pampango Apr 2016 #8
Thank you, for posting the pdf, that answered my question. Sunlei Apr 2016 #14
First, NG is not cleaner. Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #16
Not just what's 'cleaner when it burns' , blacklung, coal dust explosions, removing mountians, Sunlei Apr 2016 #17
Tap water that catches fire. Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #20
instead of fracking we should be catching that Methane boiling out of the thawed permafrost Sunlei Apr 2016 #22
Not only did the current admin and Hillary allow it Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #23
fracking industry was 'set-up' to go well before the Obama Admin. We're lucky our President believed Sunlei Apr 2016 #25
and yes, Obama computerized-Upgraded- many of our government records 'finally'. Makes it much easie Sunlei Apr 2016 #18
what happens to those thousands of people OxQQme Apr 2016 #11
In Sweden (Bernie's Scandinavia) unemployment benefits are far more generous and pampango Apr 2016 #13
They have to adapt to 'change' like those who made 'a living' off buffalo hides, tongues and bones Sunlei Apr 2016 #15
I wish we'd quit using it where I live. Adrahil Apr 2016 #19
Very satisfying, Pampango. Hortensis Apr 2016 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo: These striking numb...