Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(20,360 posts)
5. But fracking gas leaks methane horribly
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 10:26 AM
Apr 2016
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2016/02/17/3750240/methane-leaks-erase-climate-fracked-gas/

Fracking is not good for the climate. Or, to put it a tad more scientifically, “By The Time Natural Gas Has A Net Climate Benefit You’ll Likely Be Dead And The Climate Ruined,” as I wrote two years ago.

New satellite data and surface observations analyzed by Harvard researchers confirm previous data and observations: U.S. methane emissions are considerably higher than the official numbers from the EPA. Significantly, the EPA numbers are mostly based on industry-provided estimates, not actual measurements.

While this new study doesn’t attribute a specific source to the remarkable 30 percent increase in U.S. methane emissions from 2002–2014, many other studies have identified the source of those emissions as leakage of methane from the natural gas production and delivery system.

The central problem for the climate is that natural gas is mostly methane (CH4), a super-potent greenhouse gas, which traps 86 times as much heat as CO2 over a 20-year period. That’s why many studies find that even a very small leakage rate can have a large climate impact — enough to gut the entire benefit of switching from coal-fired power to gas for a long, long time.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This quote: Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #1
Burning carbon in any form creates CO2. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #2
True, but the CO2 output per kilowatt hour of coal is significantly higher than other fuels IDemo Apr 2016 #4
But fracking gas leaks methane horribly NickB79 Apr 2016 #5
If you burn twice as much methane, net gain is the same. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #6
Good news but a rational society would add job programs to WV & KY Bucky Apr 2016 #3
Wyoming. TransitJohn Apr 2016 #9
The job losses will likely go unreported / unnoticed. karadax Apr 2016 #10
Dealing with an increasingly unemployed/underemployed population..... daleanime Apr 2016 #12
Yeah, but that's not the United States gratuitous Apr 2016 #21
How much coal does America export to other countries for them to burn? wish we could help those Sunlei Apr 2016 #7
Apparently about 8% of our production in 2015. Coal exports were down 24% from 2014 pampango Apr 2016 #8
Thank you, for posting the pdf, that answered my question. Sunlei Apr 2016 #14
First, NG is not cleaner. Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #16
Not just what's 'cleaner when it burns' , blacklung, coal dust explosions, removing mountians, Sunlei Apr 2016 #17
Tap water that catches fire. Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #20
instead of fracking we should be catching that Methane boiling out of the thawed permafrost Sunlei Apr 2016 #22
Not only did the current admin and Hillary allow it Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #23
fracking industry was 'set-up' to go well before the Obama Admin. We're lucky our President believed Sunlei Apr 2016 #25
and yes, Obama computerized-Upgraded- many of our government records 'finally'. Makes it much easie Sunlei Apr 2016 #18
what happens to those thousands of people OxQQme Apr 2016 #11
In Sweden (Bernie's Scandinavia) unemployment benefits are far more generous and pampango Apr 2016 #13
They have to adapt to 'change' like those who made 'a living' off buffalo hides, tongues and bones Sunlei Apr 2016 #15
I wish we'd quit using it where I live. Adrahil Apr 2016 #19
Very satisfying, Pampango. Hortensis Apr 2016 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo: These striking numb...»Reply #5