Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
24. Very satisfying, Pampango.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 12:42 PM
Apr 2016

"There is no such thing as clean coal."

Poor Appalachia. Those horrible mine jobs were among the best paid, such as they were. Last year's budget included funds to help in the transition, as did the year before's.

The plan, called POWER Plus and is part of the President’s proposed Fiscal Year 2016 Budget, provides more than $55 million in funding for job training, job creation, economic diversification, and other economic efforts in communities that have experienced layoffs due to the declining coal industry. According to the White House, that funding is “unprecedented” and will go toward improving the economic security of coal miners and their families, who have “helped keep the lights on in this nation for generations.”


But 90% is the individual, of course, plus a lack of tethering responsibilities. I remember when logging jobs left the northwest for the south. A friend of a friend was a county social worker who was very frustrated because some ex-loggers preferred welfare where they'd always lived to retraining for new jobs that required them to adopt new self identities and perhaps move away. In addition, some were semiliterate at best (use it or lose it), severely limiting their opportunities.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This quote: Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #1
Burning carbon in any form creates CO2. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #2
True, but the CO2 output per kilowatt hour of coal is significantly higher than other fuels IDemo Apr 2016 #4
But fracking gas leaks methane horribly NickB79 Apr 2016 #5
If you burn twice as much methane, net gain is the same. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #6
Good news but a rational society would add job programs to WV & KY Bucky Apr 2016 #3
Wyoming. TransitJohn Apr 2016 #9
The job losses will likely go unreported / unnoticed. karadax Apr 2016 #10
Dealing with an increasingly unemployed/underemployed population..... daleanime Apr 2016 #12
Yeah, but that's not the United States gratuitous Apr 2016 #21
How much coal does America export to other countries for them to burn? wish we could help those Sunlei Apr 2016 #7
Apparently about 8% of our production in 2015. Coal exports were down 24% from 2014 pampango Apr 2016 #8
Thank you, for posting the pdf, that answered my question. Sunlei Apr 2016 #14
First, NG is not cleaner. Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #16
Not just what's 'cleaner when it burns' , blacklung, coal dust explosions, removing mountians, Sunlei Apr 2016 #17
Tap water that catches fire. Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #20
instead of fracking we should be catching that Methane boiling out of the thawed permafrost Sunlei Apr 2016 #22
Not only did the current admin and Hillary allow it Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #23
fracking industry was 'set-up' to go well before the Obama Admin. We're lucky our President believed Sunlei Apr 2016 #25
and yes, Obama computerized-Upgraded- many of our government records 'finally'. Makes it much easie Sunlei Apr 2016 #18
what happens to those thousands of people OxQQme Apr 2016 #11
In Sweden (Bernie's Scandinavia) unemployment benefits are far more generous and pampango Apr 2016 #13
They have to adapt to 'change' like those who made 'a living' off buffalo hides, tongues and bones Sunlei Apr 2016 #15
I wish we'd quit using it where I live. Adrahil Apr 2016 #19
Very satisfying, Pampango. Hortensis Apr 2016 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo: These striking numb...»Reply #24