General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If an election was stolen and there's no evidence of it [View all]Thegonagle
(806 posts)Precincts that ran short had MUCH higher turnout than predicted (other precincts didn't).
The robo-calls were dirty, but they are not evidence of tampering in the counting process.
I.D. may be required for election day registration, but it is not and was not required of pre-registered voters. (I'm most familiar with MN, but showing a current ID is the easiest way to register on election day in that state.)
Exit pollsters may have chosen their samples poorly, or they extrapolated the limited data in a way that did not reflect reality. Early exit polling was "too close to call." Later exit polling did indicate that Walker was ahead.
The WI canvassing board is the first line in an "investigation." They double and triple check the reported results before they're certified, and that hasn't happened yet. If they find anomalies, their duty is to report them.
It wasn't evil right wing hackers breaking into Wisconsin's election reporting system. It was a 10:1 spending ratio by Walker vs. Barrett.
If you want to investigate something, investigate Citizens United; for they made this possible.