Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pampango

(24,692 posts)

7. If republicans 'rally behind their candidate and turn out in droves to defeat Clinton' and

Reply to tabasco (Reply #1)

Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:53 AM

Apr 2016

Democrats do not 'rally behind their candidate and turn out in droves to defeat' Trump, then republicans 'deserve' to win.

Unfortunately our country and the world do not deserve to have Trump win so I hope that republicans do not get what they 'deserve'. I will do what I can do see that does not happen.

Sanders is much more liberal than Clinton. I believe republicans 'will rally behind their candidate and turn out in droves to defeat' Sanders as well. It might take them a while to switch from demonizing Hillary to demonizing Bernie, but it would not take them long to do that.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A Trump-Clinton general election poses a question: Who does America hate least? [View all] morningfog Apr 2016 OP

Anyone who believes Clinton will win easily is delusional tabasco Apr 2016 #1

If republicans 'rally behind their candidate and turn out in droves to defeat Clinton' and pampango Apr 2016 #7

Sanders will not be the nominee tabasco Apr 2016 #11

I agree. However that does not mean that republicans would not have rallied behind Trump to defeat pampango Apr 2016 #14

your kidding yourself Robbins Apr 2016 #19

"you're" n/t tabasco Apr 2016 #20

My great worry is that Trump will be able to run to the left of her on trade and militarism. marmar Apr 2016 #8

He's talked casually about using nuclear weapons. So, no. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #17

He's also talked about the disastrous trade deals and foolish foreign wars. marmar Apr 2016 #18

He's made some disastrous deals that have resulted in several corporate bankruptcies. pnwmom Apr 2016 #22

And H1-b's and SS Yuugal Apr 2016 #23

I'll take any bet on who's delusional if you really believe your words. whatthehey Apr 2016 #15

Sensible people? LMAO. tabasco Apr 2016 #21

So take my money then. Come on do you REALLY believe what you're saying or not? whatthehey Apr 2016 #24

Authoritarian followers think we all are like them and will fall in line if they put rhett o rick Apr 2016 #25

Great, huh? TheCowsCameHome Apr 2016 #2

If so called liberals sit this out...the blood will be on their hsnds beachbum bob Apr 2016 #3

You have is ass backwards. If HIllary can't build a winning coalition against fucking trump, morningfog Apr 2016 #4

Up to responsible adults not playing beachbum bob Apr 2016 #6

Um. No. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2016 #9

The responsibility will be on the DNC/Clinton Democratic party tabasco Apr 2016 #12

Absolutely...a replay of 2000! tallahasseedem Apr 2016 #13

What do you mean by "so called liberals"? nt ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2016 #16

It's not close really, Trump's negatives exceed Clinton's. n/t PoliticAverse Apr 2016 #5

What a choice. None of the above. nruthie Apr 2016 #10

Hate 'em both. For different reasons. n/t djean111 Apr 2016 #26

Obviously they like Hillary more than Sanders. Elections have consequences. Trust Buster Apr 2016 #27

Locking Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #28