Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,949 posts)
23. BLM because only right wing sources are covering this at all -- only right wing sources
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 11:32 AM
Apr 2016

are covering the State Department explanation. Even before the SD correction, the RW sources noted that there was no November 14th response with email -- and they then, with no proof, suggested that this should have been September 2014. The point is that JW itself knew the November date was wrong. Moving the date forward aids their claim that it was done to cover up.

This ignores that had the email address been the problem, they could have just redacted it - replacing it with HILLARY CLINTON. This is what they did for many other private email accounts in the release. Had they done that, I doubt it would have raised any red flags. It would not have suggested ALL her email was on a private server - just that this one piece of email went to a private account - if anyone would have thought anything at all.

It has to be frustrating that there is this flare up and interesting to thing how did the screwup happen. The State Department is referring to it as a low level clerical error. I suspect that the wrong date reflected something, though obviously not when they should have released it. I wonder if the November 14 date might be the date that the State Department received the many boxes of Clinton emails. That would fit the time line - as it is referred to as the end of the year after the SD asked in spring and then publicly asked in October for the email.

From memory, the first thing the SD did with the email, even as they processed them to get them on the computer, was to find all the one related with Benghazi etc to respond to Congressional inquiries and the FOIA requests. The new date, in June 2015, would make sense. Here, someone recently second guessed NOT releasing this due to it being privileged as internal conversation.

The real question may end up should the SD have gone public a year before March 2015 with the fact that Hillary Clinton had run her email on a private server and had NOT given them the work emails when she left. If it goes there, it shows how disastrous Clinton's choice was to Obama. If it comes to that, I will never forgive her and it will be a huge negative (for me) no matter what she accomplishes as President.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Free Beacon is MOONIE News. Anyone posting from there is not interested in truth, imo. blm Apr 2016 #1
Exactly right sharp_stick Apr 2016 #2
Unfortunately, Moonie news is the only place I could find with the State Dept. response. pnwmom Apr 2016 #3
I understood that. Just wanted others to be clear about its origins. State Dept. blm Apr 2016 #4
could be there's a reason for that azurnoir Apr 2016 #16
So is it OK for Bernie supporters to use this site against Hillary? NWCorona Apr 2016 #25
Sure...as long as you are posting a retraction! Sancho Apr 2016 #37
BLM because only right wing sources are covering this at all -- only right wing sources karynnj Apr 2016 #23
Exactly right. I wouldn't believe them if their tongues came notarized emulatorloo Apr 2016 #27
Yup reich wing organs workinclasszero Apr 2016 #44
Thanks for posting Gothmog Apr 2016 #5
You're welcome! pnwmom Apr 2016 #8
More misinformation by the RWers and other vocal untrue bulls**ters Iliyah Apr 2016 #6
Lying Sack of Crap Media Outlet Caught Being Lying Sack of Crap and Recants. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #7
I think it's worse when people repeat it here.n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #9
So a media outlet runs a story with facts based on a State Department legal filing, hughee99 Apr 2016 #13
A >>Moonie<< media outlet with a history of lying about Democrats emulatorloo Apr 2016 #28
I didn't read it, but if I understand correctly, the Moonie media outlet, with a history of lying hughee99 Apr 2016 #30
I am only blaming the DUers who couldn't be bothered to read the whole article pnwmom Apr 2016 #71
Fair enough, and thank you for providing the latest info. hughee99 Apr 2016 #72
Thank you for this, pnwmom~ Cha Apr 2016 #10
You're welcome, Cha! pnwmom Apr 2016 #11
It's nonsense like the rest of the nonsense. ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #12
The best propaganda almost always has an element of truth. gordianot Apr 2016 #14
In the last day or two people have been digging up trash from years ago and presenting it... George II Apr 2016 #15
Yeah, I've noticed it and I'm sick of it. Thank you for pointing that out. nt pnwmom Apr 2016 #33
Kick. Squinch Apr 2016 #17
It is sad... Squinch Apr 2016 #18
...what people ... Squinch Apr 2016 #19
...are willing to... Squinch Apr 2016 #20
...post here... Squinch Apr 2016 #21
Thank you pnwmmom, for the correction! Squinch Apr 2016 #22
Thank you, Squinch! pnwmom Apr 2016 #35
The State Department said it first received the document in June 2015, and disclosed the decision to AlbertCat Apr 2016 #24
No, that wasn't wrong. They are allowed to withhold any item from the FOIA on proper grounds, pnwmom Apr 2016 #32
Who needs the GOP and corporate media when you have so called Liberals Iliyah Apr 2016 #26
K&R for truth brer cat Apr 2016 #29
K & R, ISN'T TRUTH GREAT. Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #31
K&R for the truth! greatlaurel Apr 2016 #34
K&R. nt UtahLib Apr 2016 #36
thanks for setting the record straight Sancho Apr 2016 #38
You're welcome. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #39
Thanks for the truth, pnwmom. sheshe2 Apr 2016 #40
You're welcome, sheshe2. pnwmom Apr 2016 #41
Kick & highly recommended. William769 Apr 2016 #42
knr...I think Newsmax and Fox Noise are promoting this... joeybee12 Apr 2016 #43
We were promoting the story too, for a while. It was on the Greatest Page with lots of recs. n/t pnwmom Apr 2016 #45
Amazing how some people will believe anything without proof joeybee12 Apr 2016 #46
Well, you know that they can't post it on the internet COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #60
K&R . nt sufrommich Apr 2016 #47
Kick for truth GusBob Apr 2016 #48
Thank you for the truth, pnwmom. nt SunSeeker Apr 2016 #49
You're welcome, Sunseeker! pnwmom Apr 2016 #50
It's ALWAYS ALWAYS an administrative error for HRC. grasswire Apr 2016 #51
And what kind of error is it when DUers deliberately spread Rightwing lies? pnwmom Apr 2016 #52
link? nt grasswire Apr 2016 #57
Here. pnwmom Apr 2016 #58
Where is the link to the update from the State Department? You only link to The Wash. Free Beacon.. xocet Apr 2016 #53
That site was the source of the original report AND the site of the State Department statement. pnwmom Apr 2016 #55
Translation: Kelvin Mace Apr 2016 #54
Translation: you are accusing John Kerry's State Department and the Obama administration of lying.nt pnwmom Apr 2016 #56
That's what these RW'ers disguised as DU posters COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #61
K&R... spanone Apr 2016 #59
K&R! DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #62
Thanks pnwmom for correcting the record! Hekate Apr 2016 #63
You're welcome, Hekate! pnwmom Apr 2016 #65
K&R! murielm99 Apr 2016 #64
I wonder....... Sheepshank Apr 2016 #66
K&R. Thank you pnwmom, for setting the record straight! lunamagica Apr 2016 #67
Kicked!!!!! NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #68
K&R NEDem Apr 2016 #69
kick rbrnmw Apr 2016 #70
k&r DesertRat Apr 2016 #73
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The State Department says...»Reply #23