Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
4. A problem with this argument...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 10:30 PM
Apr 2016
He states that the shift from wood to coal in Europe took between 96 and 160 years. Mainstream adoption of electricity, meanwhile, took 47 to 69 years.

...is that the increased utility of coal vs wood or electricity vs burning your own fuel is very very obvious to the consumer, and the consumer is the driver of market forces. Now the benefits of clean power over fossil fuels are great, but that utility is not as obvious to the consumer because they're just getting the same old electricity and it's not so easy for the consumer to measure the (hopefully) lower CO2 content of the air and resultant impact on the greenhouse effect. So even though consumers may know about that from the media or first principles, and even though some consumers care deeply about that issue, it just doesn't have the same sort of demand effect because the impact on quality of life is distant and diffuse rather than immediate and personal, compared to the historical examples.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WE CAN BID ADIEU TO FOSSI...»Reply #4