Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The House Just Voted To Give Wall Street Billions From Americans’ Retirement Savings [View all]NoMoreRepugs
(12,086 posts)31. every vote for the bill (R) every vote against (D)...
if only the goobers and gomers in this country knew the truth about R's
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The House Just Voted To Give Wall Street Billions From Americans’ Retirement Savings [View all]
babylonsister
Apr 2016
OP
There is a connection between Clintons and the destruction of the Democratic Party.
Wilms
Apr 2016
#68
It seems as if you could not refute the argument that was presented to you. Thus, you lose. n/t
xocet
Apr 2016
#37
Vote Clinton and you'll get a triangulatedly toned-down version of this law. VOTE BERNIE!
Betty Karlson
Apr 2016
#33
From Jan 16, 2016 to Apr 29, 2016 there have been 2801 posts. Stopping for a minute and thinking...
xocet
Apr 2016
#46
So no, you wont. Let me guess, not a dimes difference between the parties?
Jackie Wilson Said
Apr 2016
#47
If you're so concerned, why are you supporting Hillary? There's a hell of a lot more difference
cui bono
Apr 2016
#51
Rude? So the one who will show up and vote is rude, the ones who wont are what?
Jackie Wilson Said
Apr 2016
#60
Your implication that Clinton would stop this is funny. Put your faith in Goldman-Sachs/Clinton.
rhett o rick
Apr 2016
#63
Hillary probably would not. She is in the hands of Wall Street more than any Democrat
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#14
Exactly, for most part it's a revenue stream opportunity to enhance the wealth for themselves
RKP5637
Apr 2016
#26
So Congress eliminates fiduciary responsibility and legalizes scamming. Great.
ancianita
Apr 2016
#21
In 1980 I got my series 7 license and one of the rules I was bound by was to give advice in
kimbutgar
Apr 2016
#32