Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
141. Watch your accusations.
Wed Jun 6, 2012, 08:25 PM
Jun 2012
You have your particular interests and you think that splintering is going to serve those.


I don't think that splintering is going to serve anything. I don't want there to be splintering. But people like you seem intent on splintering it by continuously marginalizing liberals and pushing us out of the party.

There would not have been a Nader 2000 campaign if liberals had felt welcome in the Democratic Party. They came back into the fold after the disaster of Bush, but the people who pushed them away seem intent on doing it again.

i don't see you getting anywhere with the things you say you want with a minority of support refusing to coalesce with Democrats who may not share each and every plank of your agenda to


"Each and every?" Try any. End the wars? The Democrats escalated them before pressure on Obama finally started wrapping them up. Health care reform? We got a program worse than Bob Dole's from 1996 that might not even stand up before the Supreme Court because of the half-ass way it was structured.

Me, slamming the door in your face? You have a persecution conflict.


Attitudes like the ones you exhibit make it harder for liberals to be Democrats every single day. And every complaint is met with "would it be better with Romney?" The sad thing is that eventually it might start to look like things would be better with Republicans because at least we'll see them when the knife goes in, instead of getting stabbed in the back by our "friends." When that point is reached, this party is done for and hopefully there will be at least a few pieces left for us to pick up afterward. It happened in 2000. It happened in 2010. I don't want it to happen now.

Me, slamming the door in your face? You have a persecution conflict. I, personally haven't 'slammed the door' in ANY liberal's face.


Maybe not you, personally, but people like you. No, wait, you too.

Good luck electing a dogcatcher with amount of support your splinter group will get.


The person doing the splintering there is you. You're the one unilaterally pushing me off into some splinter group. I'm not going anywhere.

I'm a union worker who has an opinion that I express here.


Good for you. I'm a Democrat.

And get this, Sungenis, I'm not splintering off from the Democratic party to sit in some corner with you and pout


No, you're trying to force those who don't agree with you out of the party. Or at least out of any viable part of the dialogue.

I don't find the Democratic party in complete agreement with my own agenda, either, but I'm not delusional enough to believe that I'd get anywhere with those issues standing off somewhere, apart from supporting our Democratic coalition.


No, you're just telling those who don't agree with you to sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up or Romney will get elected. Why not try to bring those who disagree with you around to your point of view? Oh, wait, that's right, "the left has nowhere else to go."

Outside of the Democratic party, your agenda is just an aspiration. Working within the party, it's an opportunity.


Not when we don't get a seat at the table, and our complaints about right-wing policies in our party and a failure to support a genuine left-wing grassroots movement are met with disdain while being told that if we don't toe the line then Romney will be elected.

Walking away from the party and having legislative success is a crap-shoot, but you're trying pretend like it's some panacea. Being so involved in Democratic politics, I'd think you'd realize that enough to acknowledge it.


Wrong. Without liberals the base of the Democratic Party crumbles. It's not a panacea, it's something to be avoided. If this party keeps moving rightward, and people like you keep telling the left to shut up and sit down, then eventually nothing is going to get accomplished because there won't be a Democratic Party to oppose the Republicans.

May I ask what you've done to elect Democratic candidates? You're a union member. Have you at least knocked on doors for GOTV?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Debbie Wasserman Schulz needs to go. [View all] DonCoquixote Jun 2012 OP
no bigtree Jun 2012 #1
Yes... joeybee12 Jun 2012 #2
Maybe. nt Javaman Jun 2012 #34
Maybe not. Jamaal510 Jun 2012 #142
Did too. nt Javaman Jun 2012 #165
The facts bear me out DonCoquixote Jun 2012 #3
If you think pulling our DNC chair right now is a good thing bigtree Jun 2012 #6
At least November won't be the LGBT community's fault Creideiki Jun 2012 #11
It's not November yet DonCoquixote Jun 2012 #19
do what you want bigtree Jun 2012 #22
Agreed Champion Jack Jun 2012 #25
Let's see. Wasserman, a Florida congresswoman, vs Howard Dean, a governor... Woody Woodpecker Jun 2012 #42
Howard Dean would tell you you're out of your mind bigtree Jun 2012 #97
Well at first I thought she was going to do very well. She does have a knife for a tongue and southernyankeebelle Jun 2012 #108
This is not a bandwagon topic, it's a strategy topic.. dadchef Jun 2012 #127
I didn't know I was on a bandwagon. I was just giving my own opinion. However, southernyankeebelle Jun 2012 #138
Agreed that it'd be counterproductive nt duhneece Jun 2012 #139
"make the party look weak and indecisive"? tblue Jun 2012 #159
Debbie Disaster has no idea how to fight. Fuddnik Jun 2012 #18
Even worse... HooptieWagon Jun 2012 #84
+1000 nt Mojorabbit Jun 2012 #104
Strange. I always thought she was a progressive. n/t davidwparker Jun 2012 #115
No, she wouldn't support any Dems in Florida. Fuddnik Jun 2012 #121
Ah, didn't know. thanks. n/t davidwparker Jun 2012 #167
As progressive as Harold Ford, Jr.? AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #144
That bad? Now I see why she is DNC chair. At the time, I thought ... progress ... a progressive davidwparker Jun 2012 #166
Here. Here. 12AngryBorneoWildmen Jun 2012 #55
+1 nt MADem Jun 2012 #45
Are you thinking what I'm thinking? Capt. Obvious Jun 2012 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Jun 2012 #92
So no DWS picture thread? Capt. Obvious Jun 2012 #94
This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Jun 2012 #95
Don't you have an article to add fabricated quotes to? Son of Gob Jun 2012 #153
At the risk of setting off the mob again, here you go Capt. Obvious Jun 2012 #164
yes nt Mojorabbit Jun 2012 #103
Your reasoning is impeccable texshelters Jun 2012 #152
Let's get Howard Dean back where we need him. Scuba Jun 2012 #4
+ 10000000 We are in desperate need of brilliance and savvy ! nt Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2012 #13
It's tragic to see what he built squandered Blue_Tires Jun 2012 #16
+1 harun Jun 2012 #23
Tim Kaine's another one. Chan790 Jun 2012 #66
Yeah, the party must owe Kaine a couple of favors Blue_Tires Jun 2012 #72
Second the Motion!!! Swamp Lover Jun 2012 #26
I actually agree with this Xyzse Jun 2012 #79
Establishment Dems don't care about building a message. pa28 Jun 2012 #111
"yeeeeeeehaaaaww" progressoid Jun 2012 #5
Was that sarcasm? DonCoquixote Jun 2012 #9
Nope, bring him back! progressoid Jun 2012 #12
There was a time Bohunk68 Jun 2012 #7
Nah, she's always been that way Confusious Jun 2012 #162
Okay and who would we elect to replace her in her district? Zalatix Jun 2012 #8
I am not talking about South Florida DonCoquixote Jun 2012 #10
why not Edwards. He is more bonniebgood Jun 2012 #27
LOL dionysus Jun 2012 #37
Fine with me. And she can take Bill Clinton with her. He is becoming a liability. NC_Nurse Jun 2012 #14
Clinton a liability? 3030trigger Jun 2012 #29
Lately he keeps contradicting Obama. First, on Mitt's Bain record and then on extending the Bush tax NC_Nurse Jun 2012 #43
+1000 abelenkpe Jun 2012 #48
They probably both agree with the upcoming wage-lowering, anti-union "free-trade" agreement. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #146
He's been saying stupid shit praising Bain, and then he did it again Woody Woodpecker Jun 2012 #44
He's not. Chan790 Jun 2012 #74
Good explanation. Metatron Jun 2012 #128
Welcome to DU, 3030trigger. Skinner Jun 2012 #76
Oh, wow! I didn't even notice that this was your first post! Welcome! NC_Nurse Jun 2012 #96
She seems pretty great to me. She said the WI recall has nothing to do with Prez election... Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #15
She used the term "dry run" DonCoquixote Jun 2012 #20
That is the total opposite of what I heard her say. Honeycombe8 Jun 2012 #136
State and federal may be two different things in reality tularetom Jun 2012 #40
IMO, she (and all Americans) dotymed Jun 2012 #50
I can see your point but being embarassed aintitfunny Jun 2012 #17
Noted DonCoquixote Jun 2012 #21
DLC weakness The Wizard Jun 2012 #24
The DLC types will see this not as their own failure, but as an impetus to move farther to the right Erose999 Jun 2012 #28
That's the way it always is. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #35
Yes it is like a self fulfilling prophecy Harmony Blue Jun 2012 #58
Yes. In fact, they are working on another wage-lowering, anti-union, "free-trade agreement. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #145
I was with you until you mentioned Dean pennylane100 Jun 2012 #30
No disagreements here. Get Howard back ASAP PFunk Jun 2012 #31
I would not be suprised of DLCers like her secretly support Walker. Odin2005 Jun 2012 #32
Bring Howard Dean back! ananda Jun 2012 #33
Amen proud2BlibKansan Jun 2012 #36
Couldn't agree more. Was Tim Kaine not centrist enough? We need a Doctor in the house... truebrit71 Jun 2012 #38
Always have to find a goat, eh? frazzled Jun 2012 #39
I would back Dr. Dean in a heartbeat to return to his chairmanship, and shape policy from there. Woody Woodpecker Jun 2012 #41
The problem is that critical thinking has been attacked Harmony Blue Jun 2012 #47
You do realize that Howard Dean's "scream" was manufactured, right? Zoeisright Jun 2012 #46
Dean should have just ran with it and made it part of his routine. Erose999 Jun 2012 #116
Deans method worked abelenkpe Jun 2012 #49
Mark Brewer in michigan too.. butterfly77 Jun 2012 #51
Has anyone heard this interview she did in LA? alp227 Jun 2012 #52
She's not robotic. She's just not much of a Democrat. BlueCaliDem Jun 2012 #70
+1000 HooptieWagon Jun 2012 #86
Your guess is as good as mine. BlueCaliDem Jun 2012 #93
How many of us miss madfloridian? I do. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #148
Utterly predictable given last night's results in Wisconsin Proud Liberal Dem Jun 2012 #53
Wasserman Schulz is a New Dem (read right-leaning Democrat) Samantha Jun 2012 #54
Republicans dominate the state of Florida Harmony Blue Jun 2012 #62
Wrong. Dems outnumber Rs by 500000 in Floida. HooptieWagon Jun 2012 #88
It doesn't change the fact Republicans dominate Harmony Blue Jun 2012 #113
There's more money to be had being a right wing Democrat than an FDR Democrat. Selatius Jun 2012 #163
Truer words were never spoke. They explain everything. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #168
I agree, especially DonCoquixote Jun 2012 #151
DLC dems win by loosing. If they wanted a winner in charge we would still have Howard Dean. Exultant Democracy Jun 2012 #57
So....I guess there is no room unreadierLizard Jun 2012 #59
Well, after being told that there's no room for leftists in the Party for so many years Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #60
I'm just saying that unreadierLizard Jun 2012 #61
But that's my point. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #64
There needs to be more cohesion unreadierLizard Jun 2012 #65
There is no cohesion Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #69
Progressive Congressional Caucus outnumbers New Dems 2:1. HooptieWagon Jun 2012 #90
Because we put them there Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #101
$ quakerboy Jun 2012 #106
Yes, and as long as DLC Dems keep chasing Wall Street money OrwellwasRight Jun 2012 #154
meanwhile the GOP has the extreme right wing and even more extreme wing Blue_Tires Jun 2012 #131
that'll show everyone! bigtree Jun 2012 #99
Again, the shallowness of your arguments is on display. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #100
This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Jun 2012 #110
First, if you want respect, learn to spell my name correctly. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #120
This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Jun 2012 #140
Watch your accusations. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #141
This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Jun 2012 #147
I repeat: what have you done to elect Democrats? Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #157
This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Jun 2012 #158
don't take it personally, Pat... it's an unfortunate MO for the poster in question inna Jun 2012 #161
now see here bigtree Jun 2012 #169
i'm not trying to stir up anything, let alone shit - and i do find your comments offensive inna Jun 2012 #174
good bigtree Jun 2012 #175
Strawman alert... blackspade Jun 2012 #156
Centrism has failed Harmony Blue Jun 2012 #67
I disagree in part unreadierLizard Jun 2012 #68
Centrism is an illusion Harmony Blue Jun 2012 #80
Yes! You dont begin your negotiation from the middle. HooptieWagon Jun 2012 #91
What we have now isn't even centrism. woo me with science Jun 2012 #172
Where is this "hard Left" of which you speak? bvar22 Jun 2012 #75
The paradigm has shifted Harmony Blue Jun 2012 #83
word frylock Jun 2012 #107
Amen to that, bvar22! hifiguy Jun 2012 #112
If there is a "hard left" in the Democratic party, I've yet to see it peace frog Jun 2012 #114
Thank you. nt woo me with science Jun 2012 #173
Define "hard left", please. n/t Egalitarian Thug Jun 2012 #122
I totally agree. I can understand why President Obama didn't get involved BUT the DNC knew jillan Jun 2012 #63
Every Dem Party state leader who doesn't have recent big wins under their belts shcrane71 Jun 2012 #71
70% were against even the concept of a recall jeff47 Jun 2012 #73
Where's you're link proving that 70%? shcrane71 Jun 2012 #77
It was said on MSNBC jeff47 Jun 2012 #109
Yes Dean needs to come back. craigmatic Jun 2012 #78
When I heard DWS drives an Infiniti I puked in my mouth a little. Out of touch AND anti-union? Romulox Jun 2012 #81
-1 nt Life Long Dem Jun 2012 #82
Well said! LibGranny Jun 2012 #85
when they appointed her i said she was a DLC turd SwampG8r Jun 2012 #87
Living in Florida we have always known Harmony Blue Jun 2012 #89
I knew she was bad ever since she fought against Bush impeachment way back when... cascadiance Jun 2012 #98
I don't luv DWS but.. flamingdem Jun 2012 #102
Assigning responsibility for FAILURE is the first step toward success. bvar22 Jun 2012 #123
Yes. MrSlayer Jun 2012 #133
This message was self-deleted by its author Herlong Jun 2012 #171
She new the recall cause was hopeless from the start. iandhr Jun 2012 #105
I like her, but her devotion to Israel bothers me. FreeBC Jun 2012 #117
Agreed. nt NorthCarolina Jun 2012 #118
She's just a symptom is the Dem party establishment pstokely Jun 2012 #119
Be like FDR and HST JackHughes Jun 2012 #124
100+% - I am with you on that mazzarro Jun 2012 #125
Oh it gets much worse in Fl. HooptieWagon Jun 2012 #126
Here in Florida she's been undermining the President on Cuba policy Daniel537 Jun 2012 #129
David Bender Nailed It colsohlibgal Jun 2012 #130
We need hard, pipe hitting progressives 47of74 Jun 2012 #132
Agreed, she's awful. MrSlayer Jun 2012 #134
well if you found howard deans pep rally embarassing then we got a problem PatrynXX Jun 2012 #135
a pep rally DonCoquixote Jun 2012 #149
Sorry, but... LuckyTheDog Jun 2012 #137
Yes, she does need to go. We need someone who wants to win in November and who will go all out sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #143
Government 101: The Party Chairman is a powerless figurehead when the party controls the White House Hippo_Tron Jun 2012 #150
NOt Debbie DonCoquixote Jun 2012 #155
Again, she's a figurehead Hippo_Tron Jun 2012 #170
Debbie Wasserman Schulz needs to go. Andrew67 Jun 2012 #160
She is a symptom. woo me with science Jun 2012 #176
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Debbie Wasserman Schulz n...»Reply #141