Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Debbie Wasserman Schulz needs to go. [View all]Pab Sungenis
(9,612 posts)141. Watch your accusations.
You have your particular interests and you think that splintering is going to serve those.
I don't think that splintering is going to serve anything. I don't want there to be splintering. But people like you seem intent on splintering it by continuously marginalizing liberals and pushing us out of the party.
There would not have been a Nader 2000 campaign if liberals had felt welcome in the Democratic Party. They came back into the fold after the disaster of Bush, but the people who pushed them away seem intent on doing it again.
i don't see you getting anywhere with the things you say you want with a minority of support refusing to coalesce with Democrats who may not share each and every plank of your agenda to
"Each and every?" Try any. End the wars? The Democrats escalated them before pressure on Obama finally started wrapping them up. Health care reform? We got a program worse than Bob Dole's from 1996 that might not even stand up before the Supreme Court because of the half-ass way it was structured.
Me, slamming the door in your face? You have a persecution conflict.
Attitudes like the ones you exhibit make it harder for liberals to be Democrats every single day. And every complaint is met with "would it be better with Romney?" The sad thing is that eventually it might start to look like things would be better with Republicans because at least we'll see them when the knife goes in, instead of getting stabbed in the back by our "friends." When that point is reached, this party is done for and hopefully there will be at least a few pieces left for us to pick up afterward. It happened in 2000. It happened in 2010. I don't want it to happen now.
Me, slamming the door in your face? You have a persecution conflict. I, personally haven't 'slammed the door' in ANY liberal's face.
Maybe not you, personally, but people like you. No, wait, you too.
Good luck electing a dogcatcher with amount of support your splinter group will get.
The person doing the splintering there is you. You're the one unilaterally pushing me off into some splinter group. I'm not going anywhere.
I'm a union worker who has an opinion that I express here.
Good for you. I'm a Democrat.
And get this, Sungenis, I'm not splintering off from the Democratic party to sit in some corner with you and pout
No, you're trying to force those who don't agree with you out of the party. Or at least out of any viable part of the dialogue.
I don't find the Democratic party in complete agreement with my own agenda, either, but I'm not delusional enough to believe that I'd get anywhere with those issues standing off somewhere, apart from supporting our Democratic coalition.
No, you're just telling those who don't agree with you to sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up or Romney will get elected. Why not try to bring those who disagree with you around to your point of view? Oh, wait, that's right, "the left has nowhere else to go."
Outside of the Democratic party, your agenda is just an aspiration. Working within the party, it's an opportunity.
Not when we don't get a seat at the table, and our complaints about right-wing policies in our party and a failure to support a genuine left-wing grassroots movement are met with disdain while being told that if we don't toe the line then Romney will be elected.
Walking away from the party and having legislative success is a crap-shoot, but you're trying pretend like it's some panacea. Being so involved in Democratic politics, I'd think you'd realize that enough to acknowledge it.
Wrong. Without liberals the base of the Democratic Party crumbles. It's not a panacea, it's something to be avoided. If this party keeps moving rightward, and people like you keep telling the left to shut up and sit down, then eventually nothing is going to get accomplished because there won't be a Democratic Party to oppose the Republicans.
May I ask what you've done to elect Democratic candidates? You're a union member. Have you at least knocked on doors for GOTV?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
176 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let's see. Wasserman, a Florida congresswoman, vs Howard Dean, a governor...
Woody Woodpecker
Jun 2012
#42
Well at first I thought she was going to do very well. She does have a knife for a tongue and
southernyankeebelle
Jun 2012
#108
I didn't know I was on a bandwagon. I was just giving my own opinion. However,
southernyankeebelle
Jun 2012
#138
That bad? Now I see why she is DNC chair. At the time, I thought ... progress ... a progressive
davidwparker
Jun 2012
#166
Fine with me. And she can take Bill Clinton with her. He is becoming a liability.
NC_Nurse
Jun 2012
#14
Lately he keeps contradicting Obama. First, on Mitt's Bain record and then on extending the Bush tax
NC_Nurse
Jun 2012
#43
They probably both agree with the upcoming wage-lowering, anti-union "free-trade" agreement.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jun 2012
#146
She seems pretty great to me. She said the WI recall has nothing to do with Prez election...
Honeycombe8
Jun 2012
#15
The DLC types will see this not as their own failure, but as an impetus to move farther to the right
Erose999
Jun 2012
#28
Yes. In fact, they are working on another wage-lowering, anti-union, "free-trade agreement.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jun 2012
#145
Couldn't agree more. Was Tim Kaine not centrist enough? We need a Doctor in the house...
truebrit71
Jun 2012
#38
I would back Dr. Dean in a heartbeat to return to his chairmanship, and shape policy from there.
Woody Woodpecker
Jun 2012
#41
There's more money to be had being a right wing Democrat than an FDR Democrat.
Selatius
Jun 2012
#163
DLC dems win by loosing. If they wanted a winner in charge we would still have Howard Dean.
Exultant Democracy
Jun 2012
#57
Well, after being told that there's no room for leftists in the Party for so many years
Pab Sungenis
Jun 2012
#60
don't take it personally, Pat... it's an unfortunate MO for the poster in question
inna
Jun 2012
#161
i'm not trying to stir up anything, let alone shit - and i do find your comments offensive
inna
Jun 2012
#174
I totally agree. I can understand why President Obama didn't get involved BUT the DNC knew
jillan
Jun 2012
#63
Every Dem Party state leader who doesn't have recent big wins under their belts
shcrane71
Jun 2012
#71
When I heard DWS drives an Infiniti I puked in my mouth a little. Out of touch AND anti-union?
Romulox
Jun 2012
#81
I knew she was bad ever since she fought against Bush impeachment way back when...
cascadiance
Jun 2012
#98
Yes, she does need to go. We need someone who wants to win in November and who will go all out
sabrina 1
Jun 2012
#143
Government 101: The Party Chairman is a powerless figurehead when the party controls the White House
Hippo_Tron
Jun 2012
#150