Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,516 posts)
13. In $, that's true for most years.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:55 PM
Apr 2016

There have been years in which Russia's trumped the US for sales in $.

But keep in mind that some countries produce cheaper weapons. You can get two or three of a kind of weapon from them for what one costs from the US.

And this doesn't include black and gray market sales, where weapons that are only for deployment inside the country of origin wind up elsewhere in reasonable numbers, but nobody reports that army bases are missing theirs. Those are the weapons that get sold to people that the countries don't want to know are customers.

Note that for the most part, those are the places where there are wars that we really don't like. Not always. But if Yemen didn't have black market weapons, if ISIL and an-Nusra didn't have black market weapons, much of the fighting would be much reduced. (Yes, ISIL and an-Nusra have some US weapons, stolen or captured, but let's not do the whole/part fallacy thing today, where 5% is taken to mean 100% so having some US weapons means that they only have US weapons.)

So per capita, total value in $, and # of weapons don't usually line up to make a nice sound bit. It also means having a sense of nuance and able to handle a set of facts instead of a single fact.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US Leads the World in Arm...»Reply #13