Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(63,645 posts)

4. I'm going to just go out on a limb and take a guess...

Sun May 1, 2016, 06:28 AM

May 2016

...that the reason it was hidden had nothing to do with Upton Sinclair.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Does anyone know why Upton Sinclair would be not verboten in GD? Reason I am [View all] silvershadow May 2016 OP

He was a SOCIALIST! Human101948 May 2016 #1

Do you mean "would be verboten"? Demit May 2016 #3

I'm going to just go out on a limb and take a guess... Skinner May 2016 #4

You probably hit : before the P Maeve May 2016 #8

And you win today's gold star, Skinner obamanut2012 May 2016 #9

ONE short sentence has BS name in it...pathetic lock imo. Rex May 2016 #16

et tu, Rex? merrily May 2016 #17

'Cause Upton funk gon' give it to you Orrex May 2016 #10

. XemaSab May 2016 #12

Perhaps there are many people who haven't been taught felix_numinous May 2016 #13

The thread was about Sinclair edhopper May 2016 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author Rex May 2016 #15