Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ibegurpard

(17,081 posts)
63. You are incorrect about Citizens United not applying to state elections.
Thu Jun 7, 2012, 12:23 AM
Jun 2012

Our current Democratic candidate for governor Steve Bullock (stepping down as Attorney General) has been waging a fight to keep Montana's campaign finance laws intact.
Here is an editorial by our outgoing governor Brian Schweitzer:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/04/opinion/an-invitation-to-keep-money-out-of-politics.html

"These laws have nurtured a rare, pure form of democracy. There’s very little money in Montana politics. Legislators are basically volunteers: they are ranchers, teachers, carpenters and all else, who put their professions on hold to serve a 90-day session, every odd year, for $80 a day.

And since money can’t be used to gain access, public contact with politicians is expected and rarely denied. A person who wants to visit with a public official, even the governor, can pretty much just walk into the Capitol and say hello. All meetings with officials are open to the public. So are all documents — even my own handwritten notes and e-mails.

All this is in jeopardy, though, thanks to the Supreme Court and its infamous Citizens United ruling. In February the court notified the office of Montana’s commissioner of political practices, which oversees state campaigns, that until further notice, we may no longer enforce our anti-corruption statute, specifically our restriction on corporate money.

The court, which will make a formal ruling on the law soon, cited in the 2010 Citizens United case that corporations are people, too, and told us that our 110-year effort to prevent corruption in Montana had likely been unconstitutional. Who knew?

The effects of the court’s stay are already being felt here. The ink wasn’t even dry when corporate front groups started funneling lots of corporate cash into our legislative races. Many of the backers have remained anonymous by taking advantage of other loopholes in federal law. "

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"Major wake-up call for the left?" Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #1
Thank you. woo me with science Jun 2012 #2
Occupy! donheld Jun 2012 #65
I think it was a matter of not wanting to throw good money after bad. GarroHorus Jun 2012 #5
Yeah, that candidate . . . ArcticFox Jun 2012 #6
It ended up being one of the easiest fundamental mistakes you can make in an election. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #10
I've known this since 2006 when they refused to back Alaska's Diane Benson for US House. Blue_In_AK Jun 2012 #20
"The left" has no party - though the country supports its positions. polichick Jun 2012 #38
+1 HiPointDem Jun 2012 #55
Wake-up call. Gold Metal Flake Jun 2012 #3
Amen...EVERY election I've participated in since '94 has been a "wake-up" for someone Blue_Tires Jun 2012 #17
I think, maybe wrongfully jp11 Jun 2012 #27
I know what you mean. pa28 Jun 2012 #61
Since Walker's laws got passed, half of the labor in question left their unions. boppers Jun 2012 #62
I wish this overwrought nonsense would stop BeyondGeography Jun 2012 #4
1+ 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2012 #9
I hope it is overwrought nonsense, but although recall was not typical, there is reason for concern cjs118 Jun 2012 #23
Nice first post===welcome to DU panader0 Jun 2012 #40
I agree. laundry_queen Jun 2012 #45
Welcome to DU...what a start! Auntie Bush Jun 2012 #49
Thanks for the suggestion cjs118 Jun 2012 #52
+1. Welcome to DU. Leopolds Ghost Jun 2012 #60
Thank You. Tarheel_Dem Jun 2012 #32
baloney. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #56
I wonder ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2012 #7
It can be easily repeated anywhere Blue_Tires Jun 2012 #59
Democrats have to address the debt issue... kentuck Jun 2012 #8
The debt issue is a non-issue. Pab Sungenis Jun 2012 #11
Not spending cuts. kentuck Jun 2012 #16
All of them ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2012 #34
The election will be over when the taxcuts expire... kentuck Jun 2012 #36
And??? 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2012 #46
And... kentuck Jun 2012 #47
First ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2012 #51
Republicans scream about debt constantly when Democrats are in power, then get themselves bullwinkle428 Jun 2012 #12
If by address, ... 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2012 #13
Until we recognize how the Republicans are using the debt issue... kentuck Jun 2012 #15
And Democrats need to point to Europe to let the public see Republicans' solution to the debt sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #30
1+ 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2012 #37
Exactly, Dems need to have a clear message that exposes the Republican message, and they should not sabrina 1 Jun 2012 #50
I think Democrats have to address the *deception* issue cjs118 Jun 2012 #53
Here's a very serious solution to nearly balance the budget in just few years. Ready? pa28 Jun 2012 #64
"The Left" has been in Code Blue for sometime now deutsey Jun 2012 #14
Yep - we need a party. polichick Jun 2012 #42
Dont believe the polls, dont believe the media reports eowyn_of_rohan Jun 2012 #18
Proof? WilliamPitt Jun 2012 #19
the proof is in the machines as you should know, William Pitt eowyn_of_rohan Jun 2012 #21
So WilliamPitt Jun 2012 #22
in our election laws, written by the attorneys of voting machine companies eowyn_of_rohan Jun 2012 #24
So WilliamPitt Jun 2012 #25
useless , isnt it? eowyn_of_rohan Jun 2012 #28
Because WilliamPitt Jun 2012 #31
Get Bev Harris back on... greytdemocrat Jun 2012 #58
SHARED prosperity has to be the EXPLICIT message of the Party. Everything else fails. Romulox Jun 2012 #26
The wake-up call for Labor is this: The Democratic Party doesn't care about you. Bake Jun 2012 #29
Actually, the party doesn't give a shit about "the left" either. polichick Jun 2012 #39
BAM! You nailed it. Bake Jun 2012 #41
It can't decide if it wants to represent the people or... polichick Jun 2012 #44
The author is wrong. Citizens United had absolutely nothing to do with the Walker election. former9thward Jun 2012 #33
You are incorrect about Citizens United not applying to state elections. ibegurpard Jun 2012 #63
CU was a challenge to McCain-Feingold which is a federal election law. former9thward Jun 2012 #67
This is going to be a bad Nov Dokkie Jun 2012 #35
Too bad the "leaders" of the Democratic Party ... 99Forever Jun 2012 #43
my question is: Is the Democratic Party leadership moving away from Union support fascisthunter Jun 2012 #48
its actions say yes. HiPointDem Jun 2012 #57
so who really are these posters telling us what to think and say fascisthunter Jun 2012 #66
Some Here... Agree... WillyT Jun 2012 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A wake-up call for Dems, ...»Reply #63