Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should Howard Dean return as Chairman? [View all]Selatius
(20,441 posts)41. It is very difficult to have third parties in our form of government.
Mathematically speaking, running a third party in our system more often than not results in a spoiler effect. This is a phenomenon called Duverger's Law, and it's seen in systems that use "first member district plurality" voting systems.
India is another country that uses the same voting method; however, they are able to have multiple parties in their government because there are very strong regional parties. The Dems and Repubs in the United States are national parties. The United States never developed a tradition of having regional parties. However, it is possible to replace one of the two viable parties with a new party if the previous party is weakened enough, and this has happened in US history.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Somebody that would once again want a "50-State Strategy"? What a concept!
AnotherMcIntosh
Jun 2012
#1
You're also clueless. Turns out "progressive" is the label most Americans want to identify with...
Scuba
Jun 2012
#42
That's what he said. If we elect a Democratic president, he/she is the de facto head of the party.
SharonAnn
Jun 2012
#13
If Dean forms a new party, I would join in a heartbeat, and I know many will.
Woody Woodpecker
Jun 2012
#25
That's correct--the chair is an executor, a secretary, a minder, not THE decision-maker.
MADem
Jun 2012
#35
I imagine the White House would overrule any drastic changes he wanted in those areas
Hippo_Tron
Jun 2012
#53