General Discussion

clarice

(5,504 posts)

20. Scary.nt

Reply to AikidoSoul (Reply #19)

Tue May 3, 2016, 02:51 PM

May 2016

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nothing is as important as climate change [View all] skip fox May 2016 OP

Not to be too contrarian, because you're right about the importance... Wounded Bear May 2016 #1

No, but nothing he might do, under the best of circumstances Kelvin Mace May 2016 #27

I totally agree with you... tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #41

As well as Clinton's. seekthetruth May 2016 #2

Besides.....Charles Koch has decided that Hillary would make a fine president..... seekthetruth May 2016 #3

not this shit again. maxsolomon May 2016 #32

Yes, this shit again.... seekthetruth May 2016 #39

i note that you didn't provide the quote, because he didn't say that. maxsolomon May 2016 #42

Yep, that's what I understood him to say as well.... seekthetruth May 2016 #44

Take that Syrian War crap to the Bernie Group - the body bags have never stopped. maxsolomon May 2016 #45

Distortions? seekthetruth May 2016 #46

No response? seekthetruth May 2016 #53

I'm not online 24/7, 189 posts. you posted this taunt at 5 am. maxsolomon May 2016 #55

Oh, now she's not your candidate? seekthetruth May 2016 #56

As posted multiple times elsewhere on DU: maxsolomon May 2016 #57

He said positive things about Hillary. seekthetruth May 2016 #58

FFS maxsolomon May 2016 #59

it's called a lack of critical thinking skills Skittles May 2016 #54

Her support of gas fracking is long-standing, and fracking is as bad as coal mining NickB79 May 2016 #61

As a teacher at a college, I realize how hard it is to get through skip fox May 2016 #4

I ask people that if they were told by 97 doctors that they needed Kelvin Mace May 2016 #28

I generally agree but I would say that US foreign economic policy is more important because bjo59 May 2016 #5

It's much worse than you think. See the recent study funded by the National Science Foundation AikidoSoul May 2016 #6

Chasing Ice CrispyQ May 2016 #15

There was a challenge to the claim of atmospheric oxygen loss by Bernardo de La Paz AikidoSoul May 2016 #17

Hey, you don't have the courtesy to PM me when you mention me Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #47

YOU were the one claiming atmospheric oxygen loss. I called you on your *mistake* Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #49

What other threads have you posted against me and mentioned my name without PMing me? Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #51

Of course that's hyperbole The2ndWheel May 2016 #7

I would say that bluegopher May 2016 #9

Nothing we were doing before 2000 was sustainable either The2ndWheel May 2016 #10

I wouldn't suggest that an election could "fix" the problem, skip fox May 2016 #13

Perhaps you mean the anxiety skip fox May 2016 #11

Unless the administration makes climate change "top priority" NT AikidoSoul May 2016 #18

And now these jokers are even tracking "the environmentalist left"! skip fox May 2016 #8

Curious...when did "Global Warming" change to "Climate Change" and why?nt clarice May 2016 #12

Good question and it deserves a good answer with dates &c. skip fox May 2016 #14

Thank you....good explanation.nt clarice May 2016 #16

More like "20+ years ago" (n/t) Spider Jerusalem May 2016 #37

Because warming doesn't do JUST warming, it has the potential to create huge storms AikidoSoul May 2016 #19

Scary.nt clarice May 2016 #20

A better, more scientific answer than mine. skip fox May 2016 #22

You do not comprehend the paper. It makes NO CLAIM about loss of atmospheric oxygen Bernardo de La Paz May 2016 #50

The problem is that a minimum AB 32 nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #21

I agree. And in the long run, this will include democracy. (Warning--very pessimistic.) First Speaker May 2016 #23

One begins to feel that having children these days skip fox May 2016 #24

I know...I see very little hope... First Speaker May 2016 #25

It has always been an optimistic act, always. I gave it long hard thought in '72 for this reason. haikugal May 2016 #30

I'm glad I didn't PasadenaTrudy May 2016 #40

We did not nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #48

Yep, and it's why we are hosed Kelvin Mace May 2016 #26

^^^THIS^^^ haikugal May 2016 #31

Sadly this is now pretty much the only issue I ever post on here at DU anymore riderinthestorm May 2016 #29

Frog in a slowly heating pot of water, right? maxsolomon May 2016 #33

Anyone who benefits from the status quo fights science on this. HuckleB May 2016 #34

And are ANY republican proactive on action to deal with it rather than to ignore it? Trump thinks pampango May 2016 #35

I remember how Bill Clinton worked from Day One to wean America from fossil fuels not. Octafish May 2016 #36

Everyone is so pessimistic! skip fox May 2016 #38

although 13 (number of the Death card in Tarot) is appropriate, here's a 14th rec Jeffersons Ghost May 2016 #43

And Bernie is the strongest in combating it. Go Bernie and supporters! highprincipleswork May 2016 #52

if you are homeless today, do you think you care about people drowning in 20 years La Lioness Priyanka May 2016 #60

Very true GOPblows431 May 2016 #62