Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NV Whino

(20,886 posts)
5. I semi agree with you
Tue May 3, 2016, 05:42 PM
May 2016

The only reason I don't is the memory issue, particularly with children.

False memories, implanted memories, suppressed memories. I think prosecution could work if it relied on undisputed evidence and not memories of the victim. What "undisputed evidence" means, is up for discussion.

And I agree with the above poster: not reason to limit it to children.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Statute of Limitation...»Reply #5