Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good to hear! Melurkyoulongtime May 2016 #1
I keep hearing "coalesce" in this discussions Orrex May 2016 #2
Clump with Trump? Curdle with Cruz? The GOP will clabber at their convention? FSogol May 2016 #4
"Clump with Trump" is excellent. Orrex May 2016 #6
How about coagulate? nt clarice May 2016 #8
See? This is a clear case of NPR's failure of imagination Orrex May 2016 #10
I'll NEVER use that word again.lol clarice May 2016 #11
suppose he's their nominee greymattermom May 2016 #3
Those clowns all want jobs. They'll attach themselves, remora-like to Trump's posterior. FSogol May 2016 #5
I can't help thinking of the graphic SwampRat would create from your description suffragette May 2016 #19
Mom... all of those scenarios are likely as well. Watch and wait I guess.nt clarice May 2016 #7
I've been talking to repubs at my work this morning and they are all in fucking disbelief snooper2 May 2016 #9
It seems almost surreal doesn't it? nt clarice May 2016 #12
I'd rather us face Trump than Kasich or Marco Rubio. dawg May 2016 #13
Agreed.... I hope Trump doesn't pick Rubio for VP. nt clarice May 2016 #15
Definitely far from it. DCBob May 2016 #14
Fingers crossed. lol.nt clarice May 2016 #16
I think they will get in line maxsolomon May 2016 #17
You are probably right.nt clarice May 2016 #20
I still remember so many posts here where DUers expressed disbelief that Trump was serious. cwydro May 2016 #18
I think I was one of them. lol.nt clarice May 2016 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I really don't think that...»Reply #6