Rachel Maddow assumes Rush's role for the Dem Party: King Maker

[SunSeeker]

19. Rachel is not making anyone King or Queen. She is simply stating facts.

She said in 2008, Obama only had a 4% lead in pledged delegates, and needed SDs to get a majority, yet before the convenction Hillary conceded even though she had the majority of popular votes. She did not contest the convention -- she conceded well before the convention and stood firmly in support of Obama at the convention, uniting Democrats.

Rachel went on to point out that Hillary is 11% ahead of Sanders in pledged delegates.

And of course, Hillary has millions more in popular votes than Sanders.

Yet Sanders insists on a divisive contested convention unless Hillary attains the majority of unpledged -- even though 15% of total delegates are SDs. The only way a Dem candidate could get a majority of pledged delegates is by having an utter blowout in the primary. Obama didn't have that. He needed SDs to get a majority of total delegates. Yet Hillary conceded. As she should have. As anyone in Hillary's position should have. Sanders is nowhere near in as strong a position as Hillary was in 2008, yet he won't concede before the convention.