Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bucky

(55,334 posts)
11. What matters is getting the most votes.
Wed May 4, 2016, 09:27 PM
May 2016

but perhaps I'm being too vague.

My impression is that Clinton is less adept at that in the general election cause she loses too many votes among liberal independents and even within the party base. It's unfair of course, since most of her negatives are a result of bogus Republican smears for the last 30 years. But there you have the reality nonetheless.

The difference, to answer your question: Sanders has more credibility calling out Trump on reform issues and on Trump's flipflopping as he pivots to center (compare his low unfavorables to her 50+% unfavorables). Clinton has flipped enough herself to make such attacks count for much with Trump. Sanders's consistency over the past 3 decades in public service gives him strong bona fides.

Since Sanders is not going to get the nomination, it's critical for Clinton to keep him and his supporters involved and placated. Her smartest move would be to put Warren on the ticket with her. Franken might be a second best choice, but by a long measure. Warren could uniquely re-energize the base and possibly give Clinton some of Bernie's fundraising magic, which she desperately needs.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tactically, It Should Be ...»Reply #11