Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
34. If this country is going to send our men and women into combat at 18
Thu May 5, 2016, 10:44 AM
May 2016

Then they are old enough at 18 to have a cigarette legally if they choose to.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Personally, I am for lowering age requirements Kelvin Mace May 2016 #1
I agree... it's your body you should be able to do with it what you want. Now, I might place restric MillennialDem May 2016 #5
how does me smoking in my car affect other people? fizzgig May 2016 #8
It can be a distraction. auntpurl May 2016 #12
An e-cig eliminates all those problems. MindPilot May 2016 #27
True, but it can still be a distraction Kelvin Mace May 2016 #28
by that logic we need to ban all sorts of things while driving fizzgig May 2016 #35
My asthmatic partner reacts to people smoking in their car, believe it or not. Not to mention this MillennialDem May 2016 #30
in other cars or the one they're riding in? fizzgig May 2016 #36
Other cars. She wouldn't go near a smoker MillennialDem May 2016 #41
Well, the 100s of dipshits throwing butts out do! Logical May 2016 #32
dipshits pitch their butts everywhere fizzgig May 2016 #37
I see butts more than anything, for some reason they think it is ok. Nt Logical May 2016 #38
Yup bigwillq May 2016 #33
hawaii has already done this.... msongs May 2016 #2
Cleveland has, as well OhioChick May 2016 #4
Businesses that depend on selling cigs to kids need to suffer. (n/t) Iggo May 2016 #29
I misspoke when I said "kids" OhioChick May 2016 #40
Sad to see him veto that scscholar May 2016 #3
It's a regressive tax that lands hardest on the poorest. Other than that I wouldn't mind. Hekate May 2016 #17
It's an optional tax that doesn't hit those who don't use it. Zynx May 2016 #43
Celebrating authoritarianism. former9thward May 2016 #6
+1 silvershadow May 2016 #13
Kick for denouncing discrimination against young adults meow2u3 May 2016 #22
What a bunch of nanny state bullshit... TipTok May 2016 #7
I walk by a high school on occasion and the air is almost always heavy with the smell of cigarettes Kalidurga May 2016 #9
I hate smoking, but this is stupid Ex Lurker May 2016 #10
I agree with the tobacco industry. nm mr_liberal May 2016 #11
If it isn't ok for under 21, just ban it entirely 6chars May 2016 #14
Prohibition of alcohol was a resounding failure. Tobacco would be as well. As for the rest.... Hekate May 2016 #19
you are arguing to make adulthood age 21 6chars May 2016 #25
Yeah, send send those 18 year old boys and girls to kill and be killed abroad but please don't let bjo59 May 2016 #15
Good. Hekate May 2016 #16
Too young to smoke, then too young to fight in our wars. DLevine May 2016 #18
Separate issues. A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin -- oh never mind. Hekate May 2016 #20
I agree with you Victor_c3 May 2016 #23
Yeah for more nanny state bullshit Travis_0004 May 2016 #21
I despise smoking and think it's the worst thing a person can do to themselves, Vinca May 2016 #24
Ever wonder why "libertarianism" is so popular? MindPilot May 2016 #26
Nope! Logical May 2016 #31
If this country is going to send our men and women into combat at 18 bigwillq May 2016 #34
That'll surely keep those little brats from smoking. panader0 May 2016 #39
nyc does this. maybe ny state too but def nyc does this La Lioness Priyanka May 2016 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California to raise smoki...»Reply #34