Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pangaia

(24,324 posts)

5. No. Not at all.

Reply to IHateTheGOP (Reply #3)

Thu May 5, 2016, 11:28 PM

May 2016

While your childish, insulting sarcasm is noted, my statement is the truth.

The accurate "headline" should be, "Trump destined to be the the worst presidential candidate in two centuries."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

TPM: The Electoral Map Is Looking Pretty Darn Good For Clinton Right Now [View all] RandySF May 2016 OP

What does this have to do with Clinton pangaia May 2016 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #3

No. Not at all. pangaia May 2016 #5

Actually, no reason to put the word headline in quotes sarcastically... LannyDeVaney May 2016 #7

Huh. Then I guess Bernie couldn't even do as well as a dead possum. pnwmom May 2016 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author IHateTheGOP May 2016 #13

Oh, Lordy! CobaltBlue May 2016 #2

Sadly they do not account for the kind of vote manipulation and voter disenfranchisement Ford_Prefect May 2016 #4

To which voter disenfranchisement are you referring? Chicago1980 May 2016 #6

Every variety we've seen so far. Ford_Prefect May 2016 #10

I agree. Chicago1980 May 2016 #11

Clinton 379, Trump 159 fred v May 2016 #9

No complacency for November. Chicago1980 May 2016 #12