General Discussion

floriduck

(2,262 posts)

156. Agreed, Cali. There is no good argument against your post. Just neoliberal white noise.

Reply to cali (Original post)

Sat May 7, 2016, 11:16 AM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

478 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If you're an elected dem who is open to cutting Social Security, or Medicare or S.N.A.P., Fuck you. [View all] cali May 2016 OP

+1 jpak May 2016 #1

Your language is inappropriate and unnecessary. We have no choice but to address our financial Trust Buster May 2016 #2

You don't reach consensus with Dems TheCowsCameHome May 2016 #4

+10000000 CharlotteVale May 2016 #6

Conservadems. Nothing like a big tent. cali May 2016 #10

Well, we ARE a big tent. There are purer parties around for Hortensis May 2016 #83

Is the tent big enough for anti-choicers? cali May 2016 #93

The tent is big enough for everyone, even Trump! Quackers May 2016 #162

His head wouldn't fit in under the tent.... Human101948 May 2016 #179

I thought we were using his head as the main tent post? nt Quackers May 2016 #212

And his hair would be a fire hazard! n/t RKP5637 May 2016 #477

The tent is big enough for Jeb Bush's big donors, apparently. Kall May 2016 #323

Ouch! 7962 May 2016 #325

Might as well be mdbl May 2016 #439

Yes, it has to be. We have significant religious blocks Hortensis May 2016 #198

You'd be booted off DU for being anti-choice or opposing marriage equality. cali May 2016 #202

Nonsense. It's all in how it's expressed, as you Hortensis May 2016 #209

Bullshit. Those are the rules. Certainly when it comes to marriage equality. cali May 2016 #219

Nonsense. Produce the rule or stop misrepresenting DU's TOS. Hortensis May 2016 #234

Here you go. Scootaloo May 2016 #244

"No bigoted hate speech." Hortensis May 2016 #251

I bolded the relevant point for you Scootaloo May 2016 #253

I'd forgottten other threads we've intersected in. Hortensis May 2016 #261

I'm informing you about the fact that anti-equality opinions are considered hate speech on DU Scootaloo May 2016 #264

Playing the victim after being hoisted on your own petard. Charming cali May 2016 #286

Don't bother. A modicum of honesty is needed. It's not there. cali May 2016 #262

I like watching them turn their own arguments into spaghetti n/t Scootaloo May 2016 #265

Good to see you posting scoot. They can't argue, that why they won't enter any discussions rhett o rick May 2016 #290

Opposition to marriage equality was OK on DU MNBrewer May 2016 #446

You demand to see the rule, and when it's placed right under your nose, you climb onto Marr May 2016 #454

Does crticism of Israel sulphurdunn May 2016 #306

Certainly not. Have you been to the I/P forum? cali May 2016 #317

I'll take a look at it. sulphurdunn May 2016 #318

Plenty of Democrats support civil unions but not same sex marriage. That is not a violation of TOS Henhouse May 2016 #368

It is, in fact. The ToS mandates full equality Scootaloo May 2016 #393

Many socially conservative democrats oppose abortion and same sex marriage. Henhouse May 2016 #366

How do they feel about cutting Social Security? cali May 2016 #444

No party can displease 45-50% of its members on economic issues and remain viable. KPN May 2016 #272

Now... ReRe May 2016 #424

Reps tried purity, and look what happened to them alfredo May 2016 #349

Oh please. There is no party without these bedrock principles cali May 2016 #356

Yes, but we allow for some differences of opinion alfredo May 2016 #362

Yeah, let's just make it the Blue Hat Club. Push any agenda you like, so long as you wear your Marr May 2016 #455

Demanding purity of thought and actions is not alfredo May 2016 #464

Anti-choice is a Republican value, not a Democratic one. nt DLevine May 2016 #435

Yes...Democrats For Life and its members Henhouse May 2016 #363

If Democrats can't back a woman's right to make her own DLevine May 2016 #434

I prefer Bernie's outreach to republicans to the Neo-Liberal method me b zola May 2016 #139

+1000 Kittycat May 2016 #164

Just yes. cali May 2016 #189

Neoliberal is an arcane term for the CONSERVATISM Hortensis May 2016 #190

So... you don't actually know what a standard political term means or where it comes from, then Scootaloo May 2016 #206

OK -- we've heard you make this argument before and easily discredited its relevance. KPN May 2016 #274

This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #380

Exactly so! suffragette May 2016 #276

Thank you. myrna minx May 2016 #320

This isn't fucking 'diversity', or some incidental issue. He's mouthing the Marr May 2016 #147

I SURE DO !! pangaia May 2016 #333

Cutting social programs to "reduce debt" is what Republicans do AllyCat May 2016 #365

We need a new tent if this one shrinks SS to fund another war. leveymg May 2016 #457

.that^ 840high May 2016 #321

Oh for fuck's sake. How lame is your whingeing. You sound just like cali May 2016 #7

I would like to think that such language is not found to be offensive by just Republicans. Trust Buster May 2016 #11

That you are more concerned with language than this vital issue, and that you are open cali May 2016 #12

Please re-read the TOS. Negotiation and compromise is a political reality regardless of your nasty Trust Buster May 2016 #15

Alert then. I've been here for a decade longer than you. Cursing is not a violation. cali May 2016 #24

Posters have abused the alert system IMO. Just pointing out that some find such language Trust Buster May 2016 #28

Tough. I find people who think cutting.the social safety net acceptable, more than offensive. cali May 2016 #32

+1000 hobbit709 May 2016 #40

I really wish people would go take back their own party Kittycat May 2016 #176

+10000 Silver_Witch May 2016 #227

Hell yeah! TrueDemVA May 2016 #73

+ a million. Thank you. nt DLevine May 2016 #80

Thank you! cali May 2016 #82

Totally apalling FlaGranny May 2016 #143

+1 snort May 2016 #193

Just a post Stryder May 2016 #186

Lol. Thanks. Now please post more. cali May 2016 #187

Well fuck. snort May 2016 #191

My thoughts exactly.. I'll go add my thoughts right now.... pangaia May 2016 #335

Annnnnnd Fuck! n/t ebayfool May 2016 #395

Sorry, but GROW UP. maddiemom May 2016 #210

You're patently transparent. Really you are... Just look at your profile. n/t JimDandy May 2016 #293

Let me go on record and say Ilsa May 2016 #376

By "the poor," do you mean those lazy moochers who expect the government to assist them just because maddiemom May 2016 #447

Every jobless person I know that needs work is Ilsa May 2016 #451

Hello! Were you paying attention? maddiemom May 2016 #467

+100 - n/t mazzarro May 2016 #103

It doesn't sound like you've read many posts here . . . hatrack May 2016 #21

Someone caught the vapors awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #134

lol Love it. ctsnowman May 2016 #407

All this political correctness Skink May 2016 #63

Naw, finding the term "F*** Y** to be offensive isn't political correctness. It's common decency. Trust Buster May 2016 #67

I take it you disapprove of the rude pundit. cali May 2016 #70

Does he or she post on DU ? Trust Buster May 2016 #75

Never fucking mind. You really are clueless. cali May 2016 #81

What a take down ... aggiesal May 2016 #137

You mean you don't know that answer to that question? Why don't you know the answer? nt ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #173

That's fucking ridiculous. n/t Brainstormy May 2016 #86

People who want to cut SS and SNAP awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #136

Your initial post made it clear you're just trying to silence an opinion you disagree with Scootaloo May 2016 #249

Are you fucking serious? truebrit71 May 2016 #361

Fuck Yeah! chwaliszewski May 2016 #443

Oh my stars and garters! The language! TransitJohn May 2016 #87

LOL! maddiemom May 2016 #222

Offensive in what way? blackspade May 2016 #114

If you are so offended by the language NV Whino May 2016 #175

No, putting posters on ignore is a form of self censorship IMO. Trust Buster May 2016 #181

Only Democrats noiretextatique May 2016 #437

you would be wrong hfojvt May 2016 #452

and cutting SS and Medicare is "helpful" jpak May 2016 #8

Allowing these systems to go belly up would be even worse. Compromises must be sought. Trust Buster May 2016 #13

Bullfuckingshit. And yeah, I hope that offends you to the core. cali May 2016 #17

^^^T H I S katsy May 2016 #90

+1 stage left May 2016 #228

Nice to see you too, sl. Thanks. And agree. cali May 2016 #236

Food Shelter Clothing Safety Protalker May 2016 #311

Well they showed their true colors today, repeating GOP talking points without any shame. Rex May 2016 #254

Yep. cali May 2016 #256

Me either, you told them the easy alternatives and they ignored you roundly. Rex May 2016 #258

It makes.me want to puke cali May 2016 #263

Yeah, sure, but just try and fucking do that cheapdate May 2016 #343

The vast majority of dems.feel as I do on these issues. cali May 2016 #345

Sure, the "vast majority" of Democrats in blue states and safe blue districts. cheapdate May 2016 #353

A Blue Dog still counts as a dog. Keep em. Come up with a better plan Teamster Jeff May 2016 #441

I think winning is more important. cheapdate May 2016 #449

The vast majority of Americans. ctsnowman May 2016 #408

It's almost too easy sometimes. dchill May 2016 #401

Some things are not for sale. TheCowsCameHome May 2016 #20

You realize that cutting SS & MC is not a "compromise" - it's surrender to the douchebags jpak May 2016 #22

+1 cali May 2016 #26

And don't forget Single Payer / Universal Health Care weknowvino2 May 2016 #122

I find it sad that such a Republican paradigm has come to infect the Democratic Party. eShirl May 2016 #34

It's sickening. cali May 2016 #39

Because Repubs have infected the Democratic Party.... blackspade May 2016 #118

Hm......I think they are called..... Phlem May 2016 #314

I think you can blame Bill Clinton for that. alarimer May 2016 #152

Yep! KPN May 2016 #282

You're pushing austerity measures here? Lars39 May 2016 #36

That's not a compromise. The two political parties need to compromise to shore up these programs. Trust Buster May 2016 #41

Tax the rich or eat the rich. Lars39 May 2016 #61

That's whats actually gonna happen if people don't wake up. KPN May 2016 #280

When has the GOP compromised on SS or MC? When have they been fiscally responsible? jpak May 2016 #68

Not since 1980 Lydia Leftcoast May 2016 #211

Spoken like a true Clintonian! Beowulf May 2016 #98

Republicans don't compromise! Silver_Witch May 2016 #239

Horseshit. You do realize SS can't go "belly up"? HooptieWagon May 2016 #44

We've been compromising my whole life. They_Live May 2016 #141

It is impossible for SS and Medicare to go "Belly Up" C0RYH0FFMAN May 2016 #174

On the backs of some of the most vulnerable members of society? Lydia Leftcoast May 2016 #207

Fuck compromises ... until we've done everything else first ... KPN May 2016 #278

and it is never the rich that compromise DonCoquixote May 2016 #347

Now the rich COULD compromise by accepting a 50% MARGINAL (not total) Lydia Leftcoast May 2016 #350

Under FDR Urchin May 2016 #399

We could start by actually paying the interest on money borrowed from SS and other federal pensions Mnpaul May 2016 #413

Such utter bullshit. Arugula Latte May 2016 #417

Have you called the White House to explain how you feel to the President. Leontius May 2016 #405

Keep on clutching those pearls n2doc May 2016 #14

I have no idea what "clutching at pearls" is supposed to mean. I do know that our Trust Buster May 2016 #23

The Peterson Institute called - they want their talking points back hatrack May 2016 #29

You just wish to insult. Congratulations. Trust Buster May 2016 #33

The overwhelming majority here have no use for repuke "solutions" that harm cali May 2016 #42

I just used the word "compromise". What a curious time we live in when using the word Trust Buster May 2016 #46

We duers know precisely what repuke compromise entails cali May 2016 #48

Then the SS system will run out of money. That would be the worst case scenario. Trust Buster May 2016 #52

You are wholly wrong and terribly misinformed. cali May 2016 #59

That is some shitty shit snort May 2016 #200

That is exactly what republicans say too...you must be so proud of yourself. Rex May 2016 #252

Suprise! What clintonistas are really all about... Katashi_itto May 2016 #334

Holy shit BlindTiresias May 2016 #383

I don't play your game n/t n2doc May 2016 #37

You don't? Is English your first language? maddiemom May 2016 #375

You are terribly misinformed my friend. The only compromise will be to scrap the cap of $118,500 YOHABLO May 2016 #411

+1000 noiretextatique May 2016 #438

Well in that case hobbit709 May 2016 #18

We cannot find solutions to challenges with that kind of attitude. Trust Buster May 2016 #25

Solutions do NOT include selling out. hobbit709 May 2016 #31

The political reality is that compromise is essential in divided government and rudeness will not Trust Buster May 2016 #35

Appeasement worked so well for Neville Chamberlain. hobbit709 May 2016 #38

And to think that some are accusing me of using Republican talking points because I dared to use Trust Buster May 2016 #43

Evidently you believe everything is negotiable, including selling out the safety nets. hobbit709 May 2016 #45

Well, let's see if your "rule with an iron fist" strategy works any better for you than it did for Trust Buster May 2016 #49

I don't want to rule anything much less with an "iron fist" I will let myself be governed, not ruled hobbit709 May 2016 #51

Silly, we weren't talking about your own thoughts. Quit hiding behind victimhood. Trust Buster May 2016 #54

Sovereign nations do not "run out of money" The Far Left May 2016 #167

Don't be silly, Republicans have forgotten the word FlaGranny May 2016 #171

And you.have the unmitigated gall to accuse someone else of hyperbole? cali May 2016 #53

No, I referenced "ruling with an iron fist" to describe the attitude that the SS imbalance can be Trust Buster May 2016 #55

You're being called a republican awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #144

What the hell have Democrats been doing without reciprocation for 35-40 years? KPN May 2016 #462

You have no clue how SS works, do you? HooptieWagon May 2016 #47

I know it's going bankrupt unless we act. I know telling anyone that does not bow to your position Trust Buster May 2016 #50

No, it cannot go bankrupt. HooptieWagon May 2016 #56

There use to be 20 workers for every SS recipient. Now it's down to a 3:1 ration and heading for Trust Buster May 2016 #64

How does it run out of money if money continues to be paid in? HooptieWagon May 2016 #69

Nope, just "parroting" basic math. Trust Buster May 2016 #74

Then you failed. HooptieWagon May 2016 #79

No I didn't. There is still just 3 workers for every one SS recipient. The fund is still projected Trust Buster May 2016 #97

You might want to read this book. Harcourdt Fenton Mud May 2016 #448

How many bots will you include in your ratio? nt The Far Left May 2016 #192

We certainly haven't found solutions by compromising with the GOP KPN May 2016 #285

There are better solutions than 'bust the trust" by privatizing or cutting S.S. suffragette May 2016 #288

+100 cali May 2016 #27

No language is too strong for those who would harm the less fortunate to get the debt shraby May 2016 #19

Thank you, shraby. Horrifying to see such views here. cali May 2016 #30

You're very welcome Cali. This place isn't what it used to be that's for sure. Du had caring people shraby May 2016 #403

I know. cali May 2016 #459

Ah well you malaise May 2016 #106

Debt is out of control due to the war machine arikara May 2016 #111

The money pit that people in mainstream Dem society don't talk about Lydia Leftcoast May 2016 #226

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #115

Cutting the safety net is not compromise. It's CAPITULATION. cali May 2016 #170

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #340

Horseshit. As has been explained over and over. cali May 2016 #342

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #344

No. Turin_C3PO May 2016 #331

Much of your post reads like something you'd see on FreeRepublic. Very telling... WIProgressive88 May 2016 #414

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #442

"Revolutionary Vanguard of the hippie campus left" is certainly a phrase you'd see on FreeRepublic. WIProgressive88 May 2016 #469

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #470

Completely not what I said, as that comment was based on your choice of words rather than your WIProgressive88 May 2016 #472

Our debt is not out of control...yet. puffy socks May 2016 #120

I disagree with your rebuttal of Cali's OP. nt ladjf May 2016 #128

Our financial shortfalls awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #132

Are you a Democrat, because you just used Fox News/GOP talking points about debt? Feeling the Bern May 2016 #138

That is the Republican position. /nt Marr May 2016 #142

There are a couple around here that I cannot tell any difference between their POV Rex May 2016 #250

Many ways to address our financial shortfalls tiredtoo May 2016 #157

You sound just like a right-winger... Why did you start posting so prolifically in the past 90 days? ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #169

Debt is not out of control. Helen Borg May 2016 #177

Those with your perspective always conveniently forget to mention . . FairWinds May 2016 #178

And another post from Trust Buster... ljm2002 May 2016 #184

Bravo. cali May 2016 #196

. Iggo May 2016 #275

Her language is completely appropriate in this instance. ScreamingMeemie May 2016 #194

But somehow, cutting the military budget is NEVER on the table Lydia Leftcoast May 2016 #203

Did your feelings get hurt by dirty words?? Silver_Witch May 2016 #216

I don't believe we are at the point where cutting SS is necessary. HOWEVER, it is ludicrous to say Hoyt May 2016 #220

Nonsense pottedplant May 2016 #458

Raising the cap is one of the options I would pursue first. Problem is, if economy does not produce Hoyt May 2016 #463

Here's an idea pottedplant May 2016 #465

Look, I used to work for gubmit and loved it. But, we aren't going back to those levels anytime soon Hoyt May 2016 #466

Republican compromises would have the opposite effect Bradical79 May 2016 #225

"our debt is out of control" WHAT! So you are saying that Social Security is a debt? bkkyosemite May 2016 #240

But you lecturing some username on an anonymous forum will help? Rex May 2016 #248

Want to do something about the debt? - Tax the rich who created it with their wars and tax cuts Betty Karlson May 2016 #259

You have to be fucking kidding! nt G_j May 2016 #268

I second the OP's sentiment Android3.14 May 2016 #269

Our financial shortfalls can be dealt with by taxing massive wealth hoarders Cal Carpenter May 2016 #270

So cut fucking defense and corporate subsidies. KPN May 2016 #271

Aw. Iggo May 2016 #273

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #279

Only you can decide that. Freeperville? RimJob? Ugh. cali May 2016 #281

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #284

Social Security has never been a problem shadowmayor May 2016 #283

Always money for wars. But none for the citizens of our country. Is that what you are saying? jillan May 2016 #287

Addressing our "financial shortfalls" is code for cut programs that help those struggling. I can rhett o rick May 2016 #289

OMFG. Phlem May 2016 #312

Let's address our shortfalls. Specifically, let's address the billions and billions and BILLIONS octoberlib May 2016 #327

OMGGIH -- balancing the budget on the backs of the most vulnerable is obscene magical thyme May 2016 #328

Social Security... gregcrawford May 2016 #329

Damn RW talking point nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #332

Well, fuckity fuck fuck on a fuck stick. pangaia May 2016 #336

How about addressing the shortfalls by RoccoR5955 May 2016 #339

If our debt is out of control, we should cut our military spending. JDPriestly May 2016 #341

Exactly. It's a matter of priorities. Arugula Latte May 2016 #418

the fix for social security has ben there for years DonCoquixote May 2016 #346

High gov't debt when interest rates are so low is a good thing. ihaveaquestion May 2016 #364

There should be no consensus lbrtbell May 2016 #369

The fucking, mother fuckers taking our jobs and giving them to slaves in India now whereisjustice May 2016 #371

Nah.....fuck that Red Mountain May 2016 #372

LOL Skittles May 2016 #396

How about taxing the super rich before cutting social security???? Urchin May 2016 #398

People have been cussing about corruption here on DU since the beginning of the Bush administration. Hissyspit May 2016 #402

The language is plenty appropriate, and if you think unnecessary... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #404

Bullshit. The Green Manalishi May 2016 #406

Remember when we used to call Republicans for being full of shit when they spouted this stuff? Lancero May 2016 #410

Please go back and fix your own party ibegurpard May 2016 #422

First, have the government repay what it took from Social Security emsimon33 May 2016 #425

I think you are taking the OP personally noiretextatique May 2016 #436

Why not balance it on the backs of those reaping huge reward from our decline? n/t JPnoodleman May 2016 #468

You sound like a Republican. Odin2005 May 2016 #471

Indeed. n/t demmiblue May 2016 #474

Since when are the Democrats supporting this cut? FarPoint May 2016 #3

No it is not. Senator Warner yesterday. cali May 2016 #9

Talk is cheap and easy... FarPoint May 2016 #16

Like that time Bill Clinton was going to bring it up. Octafish May 2016 #185

I guess saving SS and Medicare is moot to anyone with their head in their pocket. nm rhett o rick May 2016 #291

My point is....this issue is and has not been on the table. FarPoint May 2016 #297

Since the 1990's when Bill and Newt talked about it n/t arcane1 May 2016 #476

K&R. I won't vote for anyone who wants to cut SS...I live in CharlotteVale May 2016 #5

Fellow Virginian here. dgibby May 2016 #183

I'm for the small tent movement alc May 2016 #57

Oh, brother. Wednesdays May 2016 #412

What Dem wants to do that? apcalc May 2016 #58

Mark Warner, for one. cali May 2016 #62

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #131

That was a joke, right? A lame one? Right? truebluegreen May 2016 #146

He's a close hilly.ally, friend. cali May 2016 #172

So a rat. The DNC is infested with rats. greymouse May 2016 #197

Truth inversion... ljm2002 May 2016 #201

Some people lie with great ease. Like Hillary. cali May 2016 #215

Yes indeed... ljm2002 May 2016 #221

Who does that poster remind you of? nm rhett o rick May 2016 #292

So... we're using "DemocRAT" on DemocraticUnderground now? Scootaloo May 2016 #214

I would not call a member of the Democratic party a "DemocRAT" that is just for stonecutter357 May 2016 #223

Personally I reserve neocon warmonger for hilly. cali May 2016 #231

Actually you just did exactly that. Scootaloo May 2016 #235

no i called bernie democRAT. stonecutter357 May 2016 #238

So you're not able to understand the stuff you write. Scootaloo May 2016 #242

you seem a little unhinged are you ok? stonecutter357 May 2016 #245

And now we get into the insults. Nice. Scootaloo May 2016 #247

you insults your·self. stonecutter357 May 2016 #266

Are you finished yet? Scootaloo May 2016 #267

I feel compelled to say exactly that to you. It's unhinged to suggest that Catfood Warner cali May 2016 #260

Projection. Unhinged would be like using no caps and weird sentence structure. rhett o rick May 2016 #295

You are calling Mark Warner a "democRAT". Here is your quote, "he must be a bernie democRAT." rhett o rick May 2016 #294

I am guessing that you want to "save" SS by cutting benefits. I recognize you. rhett o rick May 2016 #382

DLC / Third Way Dems - The Clintons influence on the Democratic Party FreakinDJ May 2016 #60

Fucking frightening and grotesque. cali May 2016 #65

and YES - Hillary will Cut Social Security FreakinDJ May 2016 #66

No she won't and has said as much. apcalc May 2016 #71

I hope you're right about Hillary. cali May 2016 #72

How does she feel about Chained CPI? dragonfly301 May 2016 #76

Chained CPI... apcalc May 2016 #91

THEN HOW IS SHE GOING TO FUND IT FreakinDJ May 2016 #107

It's either raise the cap or Chained CPI. That is the reality. I know which Hillary prefers. Enthusiast May 2016 #301

Social Security funding DOESN'T run out in 8 years ??? FreakinDJ May 2016 #77

+1,000,000 eom dragonfly301 May 2016 #96

It should have apcalc May 2016 #102

It was - by Bernie FreakinDJ May 2016 #104

70 Dems committed to expanding a couple years ago and it was Warren not Bernie puffy socks May 2016 #218

What do you expect from an irresponsible media? Enthusiast May 2016 #305

remove the salary cap and SS lasts forever. greymouse May 2016 #195

+1! Weasel words are not comforting. Enthusiast May 2016 #303

She has also said awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #149

She said a lot of things. Just words. Enthusiast May 2016 #308

Her position apcalc May 2016 #309

. . . for thse who most need it. Ed Suspicious May 2016 #389

I can't believe the people setting up the talking points to wreck these programs further upthread Hydra May 2016 #78

Hillary supporters seem to be blindly loyal and quite a few are not liberals cali May 2016 #85

You just don't live in reality, and want free stuff. TransitJohn May 2016 #84

Hill supporters parrot that one a lot cali May 2016 #88

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #100

You are the one spouting.right wing crap cali May 2016 #108

And please cite. Kingofalldems May 2016 #110

Go.....use your imagination. And take your right wing crap and.... cali May 2016 #113

Still waiting for proof of right wing crap. Kingofalldems May 2016 #116

We are done. And everyone can see what you are. cali May 2016 #119

Oh we are not done. Kingofalldems May 2016 #123

Off. Brushes shoulders. You whine after calling me a freeper. Been here longer cali May 2016 #130

I posted I thought you were a republican. Kingofalldems May 2016 #140

Sorry, that was another Hillary fan in another thread. So many of you cali May 2016 #145

Well isn't that special. Kingofalldems May 2016 #154

Lol. And now buh bye. cali May 2016 #155

are you a a freeper? stonecutter357 May 2016 #160

Lowdown bogus garbage... ljm2002 May 2016 #205

Are you a Berniebro ? stonecutter357 May 2016 #217

I am a 67 year old woman... ljm2002 May 2016 #232

Berniebroing has nothing to do with being a man are woman. stonecutter357 May 2016 #237

What utter nonsense... ljm2002 May 2016 #241

The hell it doesn't. It's sexist crap! I am a woman, don't fucking call me a bro. CharlotteVale May 2016 #352

if you are not a berniebro ,I did not fucking call you a bro. stonecutter357 May 2016 #355

Stop spinning. You just said it had nothing to do with sex. But there is only one meaning CharlotteVale May 2016 #357

Bernie's female supporters? stonecutter357 May 2016 #358

PS. stonecutter357 May 2016 #359

This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R May 2016 #391

Welcome to DU! stonecutter357 May 2016 #430

Bwahaha. Sure you are. cali May 2016 #478

I believe you aren't paying enough attention. Fuddnik May 2016 #112

And these *expletive deleted supporters of a certain candidate, have the fucking nerve cali May 2016 #117

I agree. Fuck you......... socialist_n_TN May 2016 #89

Agreed yourpaljoey May 2016 #92

That should read "open to hurting and killing the most vulnerable, you coward, by cutting..." jtuck004 May 2016 #94

Just so. deancr May 2016 #95

I was starting to think my "ignore function" wasn't working. Fuddnik May 2016 #99

This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R May 2016 #392

Which Dems have stated this? n/t puffy socks May 2016 #101

Start with Warner. This has been going on for years in the dem party cali May 2016 #105

Then concentrate on finding progressives to replace the 9 whole Dems I can find... puffy socks May 2016 #127

I'm from vermont. We don't elect Catfood Democrats cali May 2016 #135

Damn straight. blackspade May 2016 #109

Agree. Those aren't Democrats, they are Libertarians wearing Democrat Amimnoch May 2016 #121

YES! They ARE Libertarians in disguise! Lydia Leftcoast May 2016 #224

If only we could get them to just take a step back.. Amimnoch May 2016 #257

Didn’t Democratic U.S. President Barack Obama offer up cuts to Social Security? CobaltBlue May 2016 #124

So that makes it alright ??? FreakinDJ May 2016 #125

So that makes it all right? Lydia Leftcoast May 2016 #229

and the Lewinsky scandal's the only reason we have it around today MisterP May 2016 #277

That's why Bernie wanted someone to run vs. Obama in the primary for 2012 2cannan May 2016 #302

I second that. (and, I've missed you on DU.) nt ladjf May 2016 #126

Thanks cali May 2016 #133

And the horse they rode in on... awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #129

Ignore the tone police alarimer May 2016 #148

Tone police = Concern trolls Populist_Prole May 2016 #230

Plus one for truth! Enthusiast May 2016 #313

there wasting when a person with similar inchhigh May 2016 #150

Also, if you feel taxes on the rich are too damn high. Spitfire of ATJ May 2016 #151

Yes cali May 2016 #159

Few things frost me more than the Western world's least-taxed rich people Lydia Leftcoast May 2016 #233

agreed gopiscrap May 2016 #153

Agreed, Cali. There is no good argument against your post. Just neoliberal white noise. floriduck May 2016 #156

Could all such supposed Dem's open to this be listed please? EndElectoral May 2016 #158

An abusive over culture felix_numinous May 2016 #161

when i saw the topic line i thought straight click bait dembotoz May 2016 #163

DLC sell-outs zentrum May 2016 #165

KNR n/t. DirkGently May 2016 #166

Where is your party loyalty??? C0RYH0FFMAN May 2016 #168

Gotta love that mindless drivel. Not. cali May 2016 #180

Dems that will throw social security under the bus . . ? FairWinds May 2016 #182

Third way scum. FOAD. JEB May 2016 #188

Agree with every word and sentiment The Second Stone May 2016 #199

You are too generous. Downwinder May 2016 #204

It's fucked up that on DU you can support cutting social security cali May 2016 #213

Anything short of, "As President, I will veto any cuts to Downwinder May 2016 #243

+100,000,000. Nt daa May 2016 #208

Is there a list of said Democrats liberal N proud May 2016 #246

Get ready to privatized SS, Medicare and Obamacare being gone. JPnoodleman May 2016 #255

That is why it is useful to preserve a Republican majority. Enthusiast May 2016 #315

No she will not apcalc May 2016 #319

Agree with you completely cali Ferd Berfel May 2016 #296

One of those times when I have to log in and give a rec. Efilroft Sul May 2016 #298

Thanks cali May 2016 #299

Yes, FUCK any Dem who thinks we are that stupid Tsiyu May 2016 #300

Righteous rant cali May 2016 #304

I am pissed off Tsiyu May 2016 #307

And the horse ya rode in on! And all of your supporters! n/t brewens May 2016 #310

Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast May 2016 #316

kick rec Teamster Jeff May 2016 #322

Amen. K&R closeupready May 2016 #324

wow there's an over fed troll actually defending cuts to our safety net? !? southmost May 2016 #326

Yeah BlindTiresias May 2016 #385

"If you're an elected dem who leaves the door open to cuts in social security" ... Jopin Klobe May 2016 #330

Likewise, if you call yourself a Progressive yet vote with the Bush cronies to poison the Latinos, misterhighwasted May 2016 #337

Your post is chock full of lies. cali May 2016 #429

No lies cali. Bernie voted against the most Progressive, Paul Wellstone misterhighwasted May 2016 #450

+1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000! n.t. RoccoR5955 May 2016 #338

Some seniors live or die on $700/mo as is. glinda May 2016 #348

"well, they voted in the primaries, so they can go screw as I fight Trump for Republican voters" MisterP May 2016 #379

Not understanding what you are saying... glinda May 2016 #416

Clinton's the hypothetical speaker--the elderly can starve as she flounders about trying MisterP May 2016 #419

+1 glinda May 2016 #421

By doing this, they are harming the bottom line in overall GDP. glowing May 2016 #351

Well stated. Thank you. nt DLevine May 2016 #431

Righteous, well done! appalachiablue May 2016 #445

Thank you. glowing May 2016 #461

Agreed. SammyWinstonJack May 2016 #354

YES!!!!! wolfie001 May 2016 #360

Interesting how many here supporting "compromise" AllyCat May 2016 #367

You realize this is how the asshole auditions for VP. This was a trial balloon. Vote2016 May 2016 #370

YUP, FUCK YOU! Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #373

K & R! Excellent Fuckin' post! TIME TO PANIC May 2016 #374

DURec leftstreet May 2016 #377

kick warrprayer May 2016 #378

This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #381

+1 Honey pot thread BlindTiresias May 2016 #384

Jesus cali.. what have you done! BlindTiresias May 2016 #386

:-) I have a lot of people on ignore. redwitch May 2016 #388

+1 mr clean May 2016 #460

Not Only F.U.: You're A Self-declared Enemy of the People cer7711 May 2016 #387

Yes. redwitch May 2016 #390

Isn't Trump is against cutting social security? ozone_man May 2016 #394

You f*cking ROCK, Cali!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! RiverLover May 2016 #397

thank you for your very hopemountain May 2016 #400

K&R Jeffersons Ghost May 2016 #409

Happy to be rec #300. Arugula Latte May 2016 #415

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #420

Thanks for calling attention to this important issue, cali. PoliticalMalcontent May 2016 #423

We are now well organized emsimon33 May 2016 #426

Really. I am tired of having my economics screwed over by Democrats. I reserve my vote to see highprincipleswork May 2016 #427

K & R! nt TeamPooka May 2016 #428

It heartens me to see so many duers are holding strong on this. cali May 2016 #432

How about fuel subsidies? merrily May 2016 #433

Kick Teamster Jeff May 2016 #440

We have a center right and a far right party nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #453

Skinner, if you want some *real* purge material, THIS is the thread to pull from. Marr May 2016 #456

Kick for exposure. demmiblue May 2016 #473

A 'Pub I knew told me that it would take a Dem admin to dismantle the New Deal. haele May 2016 #475