Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: More and more likely: A third-party "real Republican" candidate for president. [View all]thesquanderer
(13,079 posts)91. I didn't remember that Johnson was the libertarian candidate. That could have legs.
He's got a jump on getting on the ballot in many states, and there is an additional base of support to be found there.
Plus there's this:
Monmouth also tested a potential three-way race involving Clinton, Trump, and former GOP governor, now Libertarian, Gary Johnson. In this hypothetical contest, Clinton earns 42% of the vote...Trump gets 34%...Johnson takes 11%.
http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/32212254770/32212254991/32212254992/32212254994/32212254995/30064771087/7714a05b-515f-4ad3-bdaa-e72a6e5f8e61.pdf
I read elsewhere that 15% in national polling qualifies you for the debates, and he's not that far off. (Though a well known name like Romney or Ryan would probably get there easily as well.)
What's funny about that poll is that it also says
Johnson is largely an unknown commodity. Just 9% have a favorable opinion of him and 15% an unfavorable opinion, while 3-in-4 (76%) dont know enough about him to form an opinion.
Getting 11% when 76% haven't heard of you is impressive. An awful lot of people who had heard of him want to vote for him against these opponents (his 11% vote being even more than the 9% who viewed him favorably)... but I wonder if some taking the survey were so unenamored of Clinton and Trump that they would vote for the third choice even if they didn't know who it was!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
More and more likely: A third-party "real Republican" candidate for president. [View all]
Hortensis
May 2016
OP
Great. I hope every one who ran for POTUS this time starts his or her own party.
merrily
May 2016
#1
Strong women are generally considered less "likable." It's a thing with some men. n/t
pnwmom
May 2016
#58
That's just the perception with Hillary. Fact checkers say she's one of the more truthful.
pnwmom
May 2016
#80
Are you available to be drafted as the Democratic Party's real Democrat?
1StrongBlackMan
May 2016
#7
You know that your statement runs counter to all Democratic values, right? A majority
Squinch
May 2016
#35
Um, no. It's that not enough people like your candidate. By a factor of multiple millions.
Squinch
May 2016
#61
Gosh, he did. Looks like the country will be in for a shitty four years. But hey your corporate
Katashi_itto
May 2016
#64
You mean you aren't going to do a GBCW thread and leave DU in a flurry of fury at the oligarchs?
Squinch
May 2016
#67
Limp wristed, huh? And of course you don't see it as a victory. That's because you lost.
Squinch
May 2016
#69
I think they are in the minority of BS supporters, but they certainly are obnoxious.
Squinch
May 2016
#88
Obama clearly ran to the left of Hillary, but governed like the Second Clinton. For the life of me,
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
May 2016
#92
They want to run a strong candidate with a chance of beating Clinton and Trump. The OP is wrong.
JimDandy
May 2016
#60
I didn't remember that Johnson was the libertarian candidate. That could have legs.
thesquanderer
May 2016
#91
Yes. All they need to do is find a candidate who can throw it to the house, no need to win outright.
thesquanderer
May 2016
#21
It's not specifically about the swing states, it's also about the blue-ish ones.
thesquanderer
May 2016
#57
No Hortensis, that is not what I said. I said that a third party conservative candidate
Nitram
May 2016
#18
Who would it be? The republicans themselves didn't seem to like any of the "real" republicans that
hughee99
May 2016
#40
I think it would be interesting if they do... Many have said, if there are 2 Pub candidates in the
glowing
May 2016
#54
Can they set the rules for the convention still, have delegates free to vote any way they want?
L. Coyote
May 2016
#63
If fRump got most of the gop vote in primaries, why would those voters change?
lindysalsagal
May 2016
#86