Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Larkspur

(12,804 posts)
Sun May 8, 2016, 04:17 PM May 2016

Proposing “No Honeymoon for Hillary” plan [View all]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by tammywammy (a host of the General Discussion forum).

Assuming that HRC wins the Democratic nomination for President, I'll hold my nose and vote for her in the GE, but I will never trust her. She is nothing but a lesser of 2 evils choice for me.

I think the next phase Progressives need to take is that the nanosecond after HRC wins the GE, is to implement a “No Honeymoon for Hillary” plan. That plan is to scrutinize every appointment she makes to staff agencies and cabinet positions as well has be a hawk on her policy positions right after she wins the GE. Since she is campaigning on being able to hit the floor running as President, HRC has no need for a honeymoon period.

And of course, the rest of the Democrats in Congress, especially HRC’s super delegates, need to be scrutinized and pressured as well by Progressives.

After all, that is how American Democracy works. The end of the election is not the end of democracy.
And we'll know we are doing our job when the Ed Rendell's, Rahm Emmanuels, et all screech their complaints to the media about us.

Our response to the Turd Way (old DLC) whiners needs to be the famous saying of Frederick Douglas, "Power gives up nothing without a fight, never has, never will." If they don't like American Democracy, then they can move to China.

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GDP nonsense. Kingofalldems May 2016 #1
I see no vitriol in the OP beyond one derogatroy reference to "The Third Way." senz May 2016 #13
According to Skinner, any mention of either candidate Kingofalldems May 2016 #15
The OP presents a plan for dealing with 2017-2020. senz May 2016 #18
Any mention is a phrase that means what it says. Kingofalldems May 2016 #20
Plenty of vitriol in the thread. Kingofalldems May 2016 #23
She'll bring back the Neo-Cons and the Robert Rubin crowd... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #2
How's that? Kingofalldems May 2016 #24
Hillary will encourage outsourcing jobs Rass May 2016 #3
There's a honeymoon period? Bradical79 May 2016 #4
I was referring to the term the MSM uses Larkspur May 2016 #11
HRC's surrogates will attempt to silence and subdue any and all criticism. senz May 2016 #16
Wait... you actually want to make it harder procon May 2016 #5
Funny nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #6
There have to be some ideological standards and consistency Scootaloo May 2016 #7
"Your" Party belongs to the voters, and right now procon May 2016 #8
So no one who disagrees will be allowed to speak out? senz May 2016 #25
As a progressive.. Rass May 2016 #9
+10000000 MissDeeds May 2016 #21
I want to make it harder for Democrats in Congress to cut or privatise Social Security Larkspur May 2016 #10
Maybe we compile lists of possible S. Court, Cabinet positions, etc., snot May 2016 #12
The GOP will certainly be on board with that. baldguy May 2016 #14
I thought I'd stepped into Free Republic. Yeah, let's treat the first woman President like a 2nd pnwmom May 2016 #17
She is campaigning on being able to hit the floor running as Prez Larkspur May 2016 #19
Wrong. She needs the support of Dems like all of us to get any progressive legislation pnwmom May 2016 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #26
Locking tammywammy May 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Proposing “No Honeymoon f...