Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)

7. There have to be some ideological standards and consistency

Reply to procon (Reply #5)

Sun May 8, 2016, 04:36 PM

May 2016

And I have no problem whatsoever with demanding it of my party. If you're "content with whatever" then burn your fucking registration card and just vote for whoever you think has the nicest hair.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Proposing �No Honeymoon for Hillary� plan [View all] Larkspur May 2016 OP

GDP nonsense. Kingofalldems May 2016 #1

I see no vitriol in the OP beyond one derogatroy reference to "The Third Way." senz May 2016 #13

According to Skinner, any mention of either candidate Kingofalldems May 2016 #15

The OP presents a plan for dealing with 2017-2020. senz May 2016 #18

Any mention is a phrase that means what it says. Kingofalldems May 2016 #20

Plenty of vitriol in the thread. Kingofalldems May 2016 #23

She'll bring back the Neo-Cons and the Robert Rubin crowd... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #2

How's that? Kingofalldems May 2016 #24

Hillary will encourage outsourcing jobs Rass May 2016 #3

There's a honeymoon period? Bradical79 May 2016 #4

I was referring to the term the MSM uses Larkspur May 2016 #11

HRC's surrogates will attempt to silence and subdue any and all criticism. senz May 2016 #16

Wait... you actually want to make it harder procon May 2016 #5

Funny nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #6

There have to be some ideological standards and consistency Scootaloo May 2016 #7

"Your" Party belongs to the voters, and right now procon May 2016 #8

So no one who disagrees will be allowed to speak out? senz May 2016 #25

As a progressive.. Rass May 2016 #9

+10000000 MissDeeds May 2016 #21

I want to make it harder for Democrats in Congress to cut or privatise Social Security Larkspur May 2016 #10

Maybe we compile lists of possible S. Court, Cabinet positions, etc., snot May 2016 #12

The GOP will certainly be on board with that. baldguy May 2016 #14

I thought I'd stepped into Free Republic. Yeah, let's treat the first woman President like a 2nd pnwmom May 2016 #17

She is campaigning on being able to hit the floor running as Prez Larkspur May 2016 #19

Wrong. She needs the support of Dems like all of us to get any progressive legislation pnwmom May 2016 #22

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #26

Locking tammywammy May 2016 #27