Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Doctor Delivers Bad News--today's LA Times. [View all]pnwmom
(110,250 posts)52. There actually is data.
http://www.centerforhealthjournalism.org/2014/03/10/whether-its-retire-or-flee-doctors-are-leaving-health-care
I don't know why I can't get the link to post correctly. It works if you cut and paste.
Apparently not. Deloittes 2013 survey of over 20,000 physicians notes 62% say that it is likely that many physicians will retire earlier than planned in the next one to three years. This perception is fairly uniform among all physicians, irrespective of age, gender, or medical specialty.
And if theyre not retiring outright, doctors say they believe physicians will scale back practice hours (55 percent) based on how the future of medicine is changing. None of this is surprising when Deloitte reports that [s]ix in 10 physicians (57 percent) say that the practice of medicine is in jeopardy.
Retirement may be more of a problem in safety net systems, and in certain types of specialties, like primary care, where both the workload and the reimbursement rates are worse than other fields of medicine. But fleeing from a field with very high burnout rates is not unique to physicians.
And if theyre not retiring outright, doctors say they believe physicians will scale back practice hours (55 percent) based on how the future of medicine is changing. None of this is surprising when Deloitte reports that [s]ix in 10 physicians (57 percent) say that the practice of medicine is in jeopardy.
Retirement may be more of a problem in safety net systems, and in certain types of specialties, like primary care, where both the workload and the reimbursement rates are worse than other fields of medicine. But fleeing from a field with very high burnout rates is not unique to physicians.
I don't know why I can't get the link to post correctly. It works if you cut and paste.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This is the kind of problem that Medicare-for-all won't fix. Our health care costs
pnwmom
May 2016
#1
But that's not how Medicare works. Millions of seniors would object to changing the system,
pnwmom
May 2016
#5
But Medicare isn't getting very good rates because Congress refused to pass a law
pnwmom
May 2016
#10
The real reason why our health care is SO broken! - Must Read - You won't believe this!
Baobab
May 2016
#101
millions of seniors would object to service fees going down and a real prescription benefit?
Warren Stupidity
May 2016
#20
They would object to having their doctors retire and not being replaced. And most of these costs
pnwmom
May 2016
#31
There is a large group of doctors near retirement age right now. And if the government suddenly
pnwmom
May 2016
#46
You do realize that Medicare does not pay what most docs and hospitals charge, right?
passiveporcupine
May 2016
#67
Single payer has to be free to the end user, (otherwise you would have to create a tiered system to
Baobab
May 2016
#100
Actually, Medicare can't negotiate prices -- but companies that provide Part D coverage, can and do.
Hoyt
May 2016
#80
Many private insurers pay less than Medicare. Most others allow Medicare + say 10 or 25%.
Hoyt
May 2016
#81
In many countries, doctors are state employees. The difficulty here is persuading doctors
pnwmom
May 2016
#15
Yes In England but I don't believe that's true in Canada, France, and Germany. nm
rhett o rick
May 2016
#19
It is exactly the sort of crapfest that a single payer system can fix.
Warren Stupidity
May 2016
#17
yes it would fix it, and the INSURANCE INDUSTRY creates that waste BY WASTING TONS OF TIME
Baobab
May 2016
#99
I thought about it. Go for a Reality Show, only way to do it right. We gotta Think Big.
appalachiablue
May 2016
#62
On the reality show I was half way teasing, Cafe Press stuff is great! :)
appalachiablue
May 2016
#106
Thats the way to do it. It would take care of itself over time. Just put the option on the table.
litlbilly
May 2016
#23
Another part of problem is that corporations get better treatment than individual humans
lostnfound
May 2016
#42
I basically agree, but you'd never hear the end of it if the government refused to cover a drug
Hoyt
May 2016
#82
I recently had two separate discussions with conservatives who oppose Obamacare. I learned this
Algernon Moncrieff
May 2016
#47