Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(72,903 posts)
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:12 AM May 2016

KRUGMAN: Oh, and just for the record: No, it’s not the same on the other side of the aisle. [View all]

The important thing to realize, then, is that when Mr. Trump talks nonsense, he’s usually just offering a bombastic version of a position that’s widespread in his party. In fact, it’s remarkable how many ridiculous Trumpisms were previously espoused by Mitt Romney in 2012, from his claim that the true unemployment rate vastly exceeds official figures to his claim that he can bring prosperity by starting a trade war with China.

None of this should be taken as an excuse for Mr. Trump. He really is frighteningly uninformed; worse, he doesn’t appear to know what he doesn’t know. The point, instead, is that his blithe lack of knowledge largely follows from the know-nothing attitudes of the party he now leads.

Oh, and just for the record: No, it’s not the same on the other side of the aisle. You may dislike Hillary Clinton, you may disagree sharply with her policies, but she and the people around her do know their facts. Nobody has a monopoly on wisdom, but in this election, one party has largely cornered the market in raw ignorance.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/09/opinion/the-making-of-an-ignoramus.html?smid=tw-share
81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Same ole "Hillary is not as bad as Trump." Krugman, reduced to this. nt thereismore May 2016 #1
Krugman jumped the shark. harun May 2016 #2
Well, I mean, she isn't, so..... Tommy_Carcetti May 2016 #6
"seeds of discontent on DU?!" Where have you been lately? Hahaha, are you seriously trying to say thereismore May 2016 #8
Hey Krugman! Sanders is better than Trump TOO. fasttense May 2016 #35
But he lost the primary. Squinch May 2016 #81
No, she's not. And Trump's not as bad as Idi Amin Scootaloo May 2016 #37
What? That can't be! Wouldn't that make that person a troll? No, Tommy, I just WON'T Squinch May 2016 #54
Same as what, or who? muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #7
Krugman used to be an economist using semi-scientific arguments. Now he is reduced to peddling thereismore May 2016 #9
No, he's not using a 'lesser of two evils' argument muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #10
+1 Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #14
Agree sarge43 May 2016 #18
Exactly! charliea May 2016 #38
Some people are so caught up in their own reality, lark May 2016 #28
Krugman IS an economist who won the Nobel Prize. "Semi-scientific" is hardly the case. Hekate May 2016 #75
That's not what he's saying...Dems are informed. Repubs are know nothing cons. bjobotts May 2016 #22
Krugman is right! GOP only about business not people! lewebley3 May 2016 #26
So is Hillary Alexa100 May 2016 #36
If Hillary put business firist she could be a GOP person: but She is a Dem so lewebley3 May 2016 #44
"Under the bus with you, Krugman!" Says the bernies, in unison. Darb May 2016 #67
Knowing 'the facts' is not the same as doing the right thing n2doc May 2016 #3
If Trump gets elected, the Powers That Be, will "help" him. They will let him rhett o rick May 2016 #4
PR president 3.0 AlbertCat May 2016 #16
I agree and disagree. rhett o rick May 2016 #48
Trump will elected only by Sanders people support because of their bitterness lewebley3 May 2016 #45
We told you that Hillary didn't have a chance if she ran against Trump. rhett o rick May 2016 #50
Oh, FFS, not another, "You'll be lost without me and I told you so" posts! Squinch May 2016 #55
First of all we haven't lost, secondly if Hillary wins the nomination we aint going rhett o rick May 2016 #59
Yes, dear. You told us so. And then you told us you told us so. And then, over and over, Squinch May 2016 #60
Hubris will be the downfall of the Fat Cat backed Democratic Party Establishment. rhett o rick May 2016 #62
Do you have any language other than ridiculous spoon fed talking points? This is rather pathetic. Squinch May 2016 #63
Excuse me, could you identify that which you are attempting to ridicule? libdem4life May 2016 #78
Ah! Now YOU'RE beating the dead horse! You'll have to do it without me. Squinch May 2016 #80
Hillary is crushing Sanders: no socialist has a chance in American politics lewebley3 May 2016 #64
Wrong on all accounts. Sanders is giving Hillary the chosen one with help from the Establishment rhett o rick May 2016 #68
Excuses Sanders is losing because voters want Hillary not Sanders lewebley3 May 2016 #69
And Hillary is getting funded by the Bushes. How does that fit into your libdem4life May 2016 #79
This verity should be repeated endlessly: Surya Gayatri May 2016 #5
Krugman's batting average gets lower every time he speaks lately. A Simple Game May 2016 #25
Krugman is just telling the truth: Sanders people have been wrong lewebley3 May 2016 #27
Luckily he isn't playing baseball. Because he's GREAT on political analysis! Squinch May 2016 #56
This ... BlueMTexpat May 2016 #11
this is old news, krug. for a while now, the republican definition of freedumb has been: just4lulzidk May 2016 #12
but she and the people around her do know their facts. AlbertCat May 2016 #13
So paul, what does that make you? You supposedly know the facts, but continually mislead onecaliberal May 2016 #15
Paul doesn't lie: He tells the facts: lewebley3 May 2016 #46
No, he doesn't kaleckim May 2016 #51
It's the old "The Republicans are worse" argument. jalan48 May 2016 #17
Yeah, except they are worse. Much much worse. maxsolomon May 2016 #30
Rah! Rah! Go team! jalan48 May 2016 #40
please refer to the name of this website maxsolomon May 2016 #49
The difference? Today? Yesterday? Tomorrow? jalan48 May 2016 #53
All 3 maxsolomon May 2016 #72
Kabuki Theater? jalan48 May 2016 #73
The truth about GOP is old and its still true! lewebley3 May 2016 #31
Democrats party is all the people have ,stop bashing until after the election lewebley3 May 2016 #47
No kaleckim May 2016 #52
this coming from Krugman hfojvt May 2016 #19
The Clinton's raised taxes on the rich, and rebuilt the mid Class lewebley3 May 2016 #34
Only one correction GulfCoast66 May 2016 #42
The Crime bill was agreed to by the black caucus and Sander voted for it. lewebley3 May 2016 #43
They always seem to forget about this... Squinch May 2016 #57
no, it was NOT the GOP who made most of the tax cuts permenent hfojvt May 2016 #70
The GOP cut the taxes in the 1st place with Regan and then with Bush lewebley3 May 2016 #71
they are the same insomuch as stupidicus May 2016 #20
Exactly LiberalLovinLug May 2016 #29
you know it stupidicus May 2016 #39
It would appear that a lot of people, including myself, have quit reading Krugman. w4rma May 2016 #21
What about the people who honestly 'push' Clinton? muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #23
Paul Krugman will never again be given consideration by me. CobaltBlue May 2016 #24
THIS was the straw that broke the camel's back? maxsolomon May 2016 #33
That seems to really enrage some of the folks here on Democratic Underground. Go figure. Squinch May 2016 #61
I'm sure he's heartbroken. Because you were his favorite. Squinch May 2016 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author NRaleighLiberal May 2016 #32
Great post. Krugman really explains the problem with the GOP & Trump greatlaurel May 2016 #41
Over 90% of our national debt was created by the GOP. Both parties like to do things differently. Rex May 2016 #65
+1,000,000 AgadorSparticus May 2016 #66
Krugman -- still the voice of sanity and reason after all these years Hekate May 2016 #74
"Oh, and just for the record: " dchill May 2016 #76
Clinton's sliding against him, Sanders steady--everyone's sick of this Beltwayer delusion MisterP May 2016 #77
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»KRUGMAN: Oh, and just for...