Wow... that was a fun read. So much dot connecting with so few dots. Newsmax is cited as a factual source?
CLIVEN BUNDY v GLORIA NAVARRO, et al.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/312109738/Complaint-No-Filing-Indications-on-This-Version
JOEL F. HANSEN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 1876
HANSEN RASMUSSEN, LLC
1835 Village Center Circle Las Vegas, Nevada 89134 (702) 385-5533 joelh@hrnvlaw.com Attorney for Defendant
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
CLIVEN BUNDY Plaintiff, v. GLORIA NAVARRO, in her individual capacity and HARRY REID, in his individual capacity, and RORY REID, in his individual capacity, and BARACK OBAMA, In his individual capacity. Defendants. Case No. _____________________
BIVENS COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
1.
Plaintiff, CLIVEN BUNDY, brings this complaint against each and every one of the named Defendants, GLORIA NAVARRO, HARRY REID, RORY REID and BARACK OBAMA in their individual capacities, pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and alleges as follows:
snip
12. As revealed by numerous news agencies and sources, the reason for this invasion and armed assault by the BLM and other agents, was to remove PLAINTIFF BUNDY and his family from the land so it could be sold for profit and/or kickbacks by and to Defendants HARRY REID and his son RORY REID, a Las Vegas lawyer in a secret under the table deal, being then negotiated by Defendant RORY REID on behalf of himself and his father. See, e.g., “Reports: Company Tied to Reid’s Son Wants Land in Bundy Standoff, Newsmax, Sunday, 13 April 2014. Exhibit 1 incorporated herein by reference. Not coincidentally it has been widely reported and disclosed that Defendant HARRY REID at all material times owned 93 acres adjacent to the Bundy ranch in Bunkerville. Exhibit 2 – “Busted: Harry Reid Owns 93 Acres Next to Bundy Ranch,” Truth and Action Report. He thus coveted his neighbor’s property and chattels.
snip
PRAYER FOR DAMAGES AND OTHER RELIEF
62. Plaintiff BUNDY sues for compensatory and punitive damages in excess of $50,000,000 for the illegal, unconstitutional, intentional and malicious acts of the Defendants, and each and every one of them, jointly and severally, and seeks an order by this honorable court quashing his indictment and releasing him on his own recognizance from solitary confinement and from prison. 63.
Plaintiff BUNDY hereby sues for an order removing and recusing Judge Navarro as the Judge in his criminal case. 64.
Plaintiff BUNDY hereby sues for an order allowing counsel of his choice, Larry Klayman, to be allowed
pro hac vice
status in Nevada federal court for the purpose of defending BUNDY in the criminal case.
= new reply since forum marked as read