Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cosmocat

(15,487 posts)
71. Your points are mostly valid
Tue May 10, 2016, 02:20 PM
May 2016

in regards to the polices and their effects. I could have lived without the little dig at the end, that aside.

1) We don't elect Kings/Queens. People get myopic. POTUS does not do write and declare laws. They most times have marginal say in writing them. Now, they can veto them, and I supposed Bill could have vetoed these bills. At the time, there still was this thing that existed where the POTUS worked with the other party to do things. And, overall the bills were reflective of what the country as a whole wanted at the time.

2) POTUS DOES get elected - first in the primary and second in the general. Clinton mostly said he would support these things when running, the voters, both democrats in the primary, and the overall electorate in the general, elected him knowing that.

Both to the point - they aren't the cause, they are the symptom. Of a country too easily swayed by right wing bullshit/too fucking apathetic to fight for the kinds of things necessary to make the country better.

That said, while Clinton and BHO were "centrist" in some ways, and certainly too cozy with big money, they did advance progressive policy positions. And, while we might be left wanting, we were infinitely better off than what we would have gotten with an R as POTUS.

Hillary, it is what it is. I knew it a year ago when this all started, there simply are more democrats who are comfortable with her/her name than they are with Bernie. It was close, Bernie made a serious run at it. But, it is a reflection of the reality that while we see those policies that clearly would better serve this country moving forward in a better way that Bernie advocates for, there are more democrats who see more in Hillary.

That isn't her fault, everyone gets to run for POTUS, witness Trump. He is a meglomaniac idiot. That is plainly clear. He isn't the issue, it's that there is a critical mass in this country fucking stupid enough to possibly make him POTUS.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have it on the table, just waiting for me to finish what I'm currently reading. arcane1 May 2016 #1
Right now on DU, posters are proving the premise... Human101948 May 2016 #2
My fear is that Hillary hate will get Trump elected. bjobotts May 2016 #16
When the Democrats stopped giving a fig about the poor, the middle class got put on notice. Octafish May 2016 #21
here's what analysts/observers like frank have completely missed certainot May 2016 #38
I'm sure Frank has not missed this.... tomp May 2016 #55
it has the perfect defense - it gives liberals headaches certainot May 2016 #61
you are right that these things could be protested... tomp May 2016 #73
dem politicians, strategists, etc don't listen to talk radio certainot May 2016 #75
Goals for expanding opportunity/economic justice have been replaced by political correctness goals. MadDAsHell May 2016 #3
Over the top much? lunatica May 2016 #19
Well said!!!!! tonyt53 May 2016 #26
Well made point. Absolutely agree. bjo59 May 2016 #35
This bullshit about supposed political correctness is what SheilaT May 2016 #39
"the very things that originally built the middle class in this country." MadDAsHell May 2016 #40
You really do need to read the book. The things that originally built the middle class SheilaT May 2016 #41
Isn't the battle over political correctness a major plank in the Trump platform? JoePhilly May 2016 #51
I agree... Hotler May 2016 #52
Get the book, 'Listen Liberal! Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People?' appalachiablue May 2016 #4
Thanks! Bears repeating: NewImproved Deal May 2016 #9
Amen! Bernie is a New Deal Democrat, Not a Radical, as Chomsky recently said. appalachiablue May 2016 #15
Celebritocracy Califonz May 2016 #45
Everyone who calls him/herself a Democrat.... ReRe May 2016 #18
I caught it for real. Like Chris Hedges' recent Mexicanization of the US. appalachiablue May 2016 #63
Bill Clinton did not destroy the traditional base of the Dem party Yavin4 May 2016 #5
Yep, Dixicrats and Reagan Democrats weakened the Democratic Party n/t csziggy May 2016 #7
"the Dems had to change their political strategy or face continued losses" Boomer May 2016 #12
What did "those people" gain by voting for Nixon, Reagan, and Bush? Yavin4 May 2016 #27
Did you read the book? SheilaT May 2016 #13
Didn't read the book. I Saw him interviewed, and he's flat out lying to serve his point. Yavin4 May 2016 #22
Really? You saw him interviewed and you know he's flat out lying? SheilaT May 2016 #24
Yes we get it. Bernie wants to take us back to the good old days of FDR leftofcool May 2016 #53
Do you honestly believe Bernie wants to bring back lynchings and internment camps? nt bunnies May 2016 #56
I would not off hand dismiss the point the other poster is making Cosmocat May 2016 #60
It's hard to know if Bill and Hillary and all the other New Way Dems, Neoliberals, whatever name you SheilaT May 2016 #65
Your points are mostly valid Cosmocat May 2016 #71
Ending welfare is a symptom of the increased poverty? SheilaT May 2016 #72
Again Cosmocat May 2016 #74
And odds are... ReRe May 2016 #20
I was 28 when WJC came into office. Yavin4 May 2016 #23
Total... ReRe May 2016 #25
The DLC was formed after the 1988 election. Yavin4 May 2016 #28
But what about your ReRe May 2016 #29
I marched with my father, a union shop steward, in labor's protest of Reagan's firing PATCO Yavin4 May 2016 #31
Boy... ReRe May 2016 #33
PATCO had endorsed Reagan in 1980, remember Recursion May 2016 #66
Yes, they could no longer stand for civil rights or unions. They had to support the corporatocracy bjobotts May 2016 #37
Reagan Democrat Yavin4 May 2016 #42
You are not going back far enough. Look at the election in '72. truebluegreen May 2016 #43
Yep. 16 years before the DLC and 20 years before Clinton Yavin4 May 2016 #44
Or vice versa. Potayto Potahto truebluegreen May 2016 #54
Nothing is going to change for the better until the American White working class stops being racist. Yavin4 May 2016 #59
You just contradicted yourself: truebluegreen May 2016 #62
Lol, i think i believe him over you. Nt Logical May 2016 #57
Being a Democrat for 44 years - he nails it. Mark 750 May 2016 #6
.+1 840high May 2016 #8
cant wait for our resident conservatives to drop in to disparage this book KG May 2016 #10
The nice thing Old Codger May 2016 #17
+1 an entire horseshit load. Enthusiast May 2016 #46
They have already. alarimer May 2016 #32
And now it's HRC-WJC, Inc. GoneOffShore May 2016 #36
K&R! If you've read the book, there's a contingent of DUers who personify the Dem party problems nt riderinthestorm May 2016 #11
Do you think it's because chervilant May 2016 #49
I'd bet $$ they haven't read it. They'll never accept his points riderinthestorm May 2016 #64
KnR nt chknltl May 2016 #14
Never forget that the Koch brothers provided seed money to start the DLC Warpy May 2016 #30
They wanted to hurt Democrats and they've succeeded in doing that, very, very well. In the haikugal May 2016 #34
Huge +1! Enthusiast May 2016 #47
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast May 2016 #48
K&R B Calm May 2016 #50
K&R me b zola May 2016 #58
Alternative Radio RoccoR5955 May 2016 #67
word. AR rocks. KG May 2016 #68
CSpan video discussion of Listen Liberal with Thomas Frank HERE librechik May 2016 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author potisok May 2016 #70
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Listen, Liberal by Thomas...»Reply #71