Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hamsterjill

(17,689 posts)
19. If Dallas is like San Antonio, roaming packs are becoming more common.
Tue May 10, 2016, 03:20 PM
May 2016

San Antonio is in the midst of trying to become "no kill".

Please understand that I am an animal lover and I want nothing more than for every companion animal to have a loving home, proper care, and respect.

In San Antonio, at least, the City is trying to appear that it has reached "no kill" without actually becoming "no kill". You see, "no kill" is defined as 90% of the healthy, adoptable dogs and cats making it out of the city pound. But what this has become is a numbers game. The City of San Antonio publishes many fluff media pieces and feel good stories that it has reached no kill status, but in all reality, it is failing to address the very large numbers of dogs that roam the streets. If the City doesn't pick up and impound these dogs, then the dogs are not counted against the City's statistics that make up that magical 90% number.

We have a growing problem because of irresponsible people. It is not a dog's fault that a dog acts like a dog. The fault lies on the irresponsible owners who get a puppy, and then when that puppy grows up and isn't as cute anymore, requires actual manual labor to care for, whines, barks, pukes, poops, etc., they throw it out to fend for itself. The City needs to go after these "owners" and hit their pocket books. Because the same owner that throws one out will have another one in a week or two, and the cycle repeats itself over and over and over again. The roaming dogs breed unrestrained, they are hit by cars, they kill, they spread disease, and they break your heart.

But, it's all about making the public feel good that San Antonio is a "no kill" city.

Rest assured that there are many, many small, independent rescue groups working in San Antonio to promote spay/neuter and to rescue and rehome as many dogs as possible. There are drives during winter months for dog houses to give to dogs that don't have any shelter whatsoever. There are food drives, and there are rabies clinics. But until the City itself steps up and does something about these irresponsible owners (i.e., fine them, etc. - which rescue groups do not have the authority to do obviously), it is a never ending, growing problem.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Just horrible! RIP... jonno99 May 2016 #1
let's thank the do gooders who think dogs are more important than people nt msongs May 2016 #2
Sounds like you should thank the idiots who let their dogs run loose from the house. haele May 2016 #7
For some time, my feeling has been... Orrex May 2016 #10
Excellent post! inanna May 2016 #21
They're certainly less murderous whatthehey May 2016 #9
That's only because we restrict their gun ownership Orrex May 2016 #12
I'm sure meant whimsically, but even so still stands whatthehey May 2016 #15
When a functional, autonomous person commits a crime... Orrex May 2016 #16
However, we cannot change the fact that they are wolves. Coventina May 2016 #20
It would seem that we're basically on the same page Orrex May 2016 #22
Yet I doubt you would accept whatthehey May 2016 #29
Well, there you would be wrong. I'm actually quite the pessimist when it comes to human nature. Coventina May 2016 #30
People blame the parents whenever young folks commit crimes whatthehey May 2016 #24
You'll note that I specified a functional, autonomous human Orrex May 2016 #25
By any criterion which excludes human children, there is no such thing then whatthehey May 2016 #28
Well, it goes both ways. Orrex May 2016 #33
That's not the right way to look at those numbers, by the way Orrex May 2016 #27
""In response to the mauling, Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings told local media the problem of roaming dog braddy May 2016 #3
Dog packs have been a problem in Detroit for years. ScreamingMeemie May 2016 #31
A dog attack is a terrible way to go, cities shouldn't tolerate this at all. braddy May 2016 #32
I'm guessing they weren't Labs and Golden retrievers... linuxman May 2016 #4
If it's a feral pack, all bets are off. Coventina May 2016 #5
It says they were taken from a house later by animal control. linuxman May 2016 #6
Oh yeah, I think there's a very high probability these are some sort of bully breed. Coventina May 2016 #8
When I was a child, there was a feral pack lead by a St. Bernard in a neighborhood park. haele May 2016 #11
I remember when the "demon dog" in the media was always a Doberman. Coventina May 2016 #13
Oh yeah. Shepherds and Rottweilers had their turns too whatthehey May 2016 #18
They took time off from nannying small children to rip this woman to shreds alcibiades_mystery May 2016 #14
This is a local story here. It took animal control 4 days to show up after repeated calls. Major Nikon May 2016 #17
Someone should have checked at the local donut shop. lpbk2713 May 2016 #23
If Dallas is like San Antonio, roaming packs are becoming more common. hamsterjill May 2016 #19
How horrible. May she rest in peace. snagglepuss May 2016 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dallas woman dies after b...»Reply #19